The Experience with a Surgical Camp in a Rural Hospital in Northern Uganda

Introduction: In Sub-Saharan Africa, surgical conditions remain neglected in its health care systems. This results in a low surgical output from district hospitals with many patients referred to Referral Hospitals in the region. Therefore surgical camps in district hospitals are often necessary where volunteer surgical teams perform a wide range of mostly elective surgical procedures. These surgical camps are pre-planned activities carried out at no cost to the patients who belong to poor and hard to reach vulnerable communities. The purpose of this surgical camp was to offer free specialised surgical service in a rural hospital and hence improve surgical access to a poor vulnerable community in Northern Uganda. Training basic surgical skills and the provision of continuous medical education to medical officers in the region was also part of the objective of this surgical camp. Methods: A descriptive study using data collected from a one week surgical camp in the year 2011 was performed at St. Joseph’s Maracha Hospital. Data from operating log forms regarding date of procedure, patient gender, clinical diagnosis, operation performed and type of anaesthesia was obtained. Data was analysed for age, sex, type and rate of surgical procedure and type of anaesthesia. The participants’ involved specialist general surgeons, medical officers, clinical officers, theatre nurses and anaesthetists. Results: In total, 105 surgical procedures were performed during the 7-day-long camp. Mean age of the patients was 39.54 years. The male: female ratio was 1:0.38. Adult inguinal herniorrhaphy formed 68.6% of all surgical procedures. Conclusions: The bulk of surgical disease encountered during the camp were inguinal hernias. Surgical camps improve access to surgical care to vulnerable hard to reach populations and should become an integral part of health service delivery in rural Africa.

Rare Cases of Bilateral Lumbar Hernia: Anaesthesia Concerns and Lessons Learnt

Bilateral lumbar hernias are rare. There is a paucity of literature regarding the anaesthesia techniques used and challenges faced. In the present era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopy has gained name and fame and is the modality of choice for hernia repairs. Methods: We report a series of 4 cases of bilateral lumbar hernia operated in our institute, using 4 different anaesthesia techniques over a period of 2 years and 9 months with the aim to focus on the varied anaesthetic techniques and the advantages and disadvantages of each. Results: General anaesthesia supplemented with epidural anaesthesia is recommended for laparoscopic repair, while in very high risk cases, combined segmental spinal- epidural anaesthesia may be a better option. Low dose segmental spinal provides commendable cardiovascular stability. It is a useful alternative in patients with multiple comorbidities, cardiac and respiratory diseases and aids early recovery and ambulation. Conclusion: Irrespective of the type of anaesthesia technique administered, patients’ safety and comfort should be of prime importance, while maintaining optimum haemodynamics and physiology.

Two types of anaesthesia and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a secondary analysis based on a single-centre retrospective cohort study in Singapore

Background Evidence regarding the relationship between the type of anaesthesia and length of hospital stay is controversial. Therefore, the objective of this research was to investigate whether the type of anaesthesia was independently related to the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after adjusting for other covariates. Methods The present study was a cohort study. A total of 2622 participants underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a hospital in Singapore from 2013 to 1-1 to 2014-6-30. The target independent variable and the dependent variable were two types of anaesthesia and length of hospital stay, respectively. The covariates included age, BMI, hemoglobin (Hb), length of stay (LOS), duration of surgery, sex, ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Status, smoking, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), diabetes mellitus (DM), DM on insulin, ischemic heart disease (IHD), congestive cardiac failure (CCF), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), creatinine > 2 mg/dl, day of week of operation. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed on the variables that might influence the choice of the two types of anaesthesia and the LOS. This association was then tested by subgroup analysis using hierarchical variables. Results The average age of 2366 selected participants was 66.57 ± 8.23 years old, and approximately 24.18% of them were male. The average LOS of all enrolled patients was 5.37 ± 4.87 days, 5.92 ± 6.20 days for patients receiving general anaesthesia (GA) and 5.09 ± 3.98 days for patients receiving regional anaesthesia (RA), P < 0.05. The results of fully adjusted linear regression showed that GA lasted 0.93 days longer than RA (β = 0.93, 95% CI (0.54, 1.32)), P < 0.05. The results of fully adjusted logistic regression showed that LOS > 6 days was 45% higher for GA than for RA (OR = 1.45, 95% CI (1.15, 1.84)), P < 0.05. Through the subgroup analysis, the results were basically stable and reliable. Conclusion Our study showed that GA increased the length of stay during unilateral TKA compared with RA. This finding needs to be validated in future studies.

Long-Term Clinically Significant Posterior Capsular Opacification Development Pattern in Eyes Implanted with an Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens with a Square Optic Edge

Purpose. To analyse the posterior capsular opacification (PCO) development pattern in the long term in eyes implanted with a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with a square edge all around the optic. Methods. Longitudinal retrospective study is data analyzed from a total of 7059 eyes from 4764 patients (mean age: 75.8 years) undergoing cataract surgery with implantation of an aspheric monofocal IOL (Bi-Flex HL 677AB/677P, Medicontur, Budapest, Hungary). These data were retrospectively collected using the electronic medical record of the hospitals involved. Nd : YAG capsulotomy rates were calculated per year during a follow-up of more than 10 years. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to establish the transparent capsule survival rate. Results. The Nd : YAG capsulotomy rate increased from 1.1% at 1 year postoperatively to 17.2% at 5 years after surgery. No significant differences were found between eyes with and without capsulotomy in terms of age p = 0.202 , gender p = 0.061 , type of anaesthesia used p = 0.128 , and presence of conditions such as hard cataract p = 0.111 or pseudoexfoliation p = 0.137 . IOL power was significantly lower in those eyes of patients requiring Nd : YAG capsulotomy during the follow-up p < 0.001 . Significantly more eyes implanted with the preloaded model of the IOL required capsulotomy p < 0.001 . Mean survival time and rate were 9.38 years and 85.9%, respectively. Conclusions. Most eyes undergoing cataract with implantation of the Bi-Flex IOL do not develop a clinically significant PCO requiring Nd : YAG capsulotomy in the long term. IOL material and design may be the main factors accounting for this finding.

Role of anaesthesia in endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy: A meta-analysis of 3282 cases

Distal acquired lacrimal obstruction is a common adulthood pathology whose primary treatment is represented by EXT-DCR and END-DCR. When considering their influencing factors, the role of the type of anaesthesia applied during these surgeries has a major role. The aim of this study is to systematically analyse the influence of general and local/regional anaesthesia on the final success rates of EXT-DCR and END-DCR. Primary EXT-DCR and END-DCR articles published later than 2000 with at least 50 single clinician procedures were selected. Exclusion criteria included acute dacryocystitis, tumours, studies focussing on revision surgeries, surgeries with adjunctive procedures, not clearly demarcated surgeons, mixed cohort study of acquired and congenital disorders. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with MOOSE guidelines; where feasible, a meta-analysis of the collected results was conducted. As a result, 11,445 articles were selected of which 2741 were examined after screening, and 16 included after full text review (0.6% of the initial papers). Among all papers included, the number of EXT-DCR was not enough to provide a solid analysis of the effect of anaesthesia; conversely, a significant difference of success rate was noted between local anaesthesia + sedation (85.1%, IC 77.8%–90.4%), and general anaesthesia (90.8%, IC 88.8%–92.4%) in END-DCR ( p = 0.048). In conclusion, END-DCR performed with general anaesthesia should be considered as the solution of choice; however, local anaesthesia, eventually associated with a sedation, can be used as an alternative in selected cases. No meaningful conclusions could be drawn for EXT-DCR, due to the lack of data.

A retrospective observational study on the types of anaesthesia in hip fracture surgery

Background There is no specific recommendation regarding the type of anaesthesia in hip fracture surgery. Objectives This study sought to examine the current local anaesthetic practice (general anaesthesia versus regional anaesthesia (RA)) in hip fracture surgery and to analyse their associations with perioperative outcomes. Methodology A retrospective observational study of hip fracture patients from April to December 2017 was undertaken. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analysed against the types of anaesthesia using multiple logistic regression. Results One hundred and twelve out of 154 patients (72.7%) had a general anaesthesia. Patients from residential care facilities were more likely to receive general anaesthesia (OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1, 7.4; P = 0.03). There was no significant association between type of anaesthesia and specific postoperative outcomes; however, patients with postoperative delirium and hypotension were more likely to have received general anaesthesia [OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 0.68, 4.38; P = 0.25] and [OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 0.67, 4.04; P = 0.27] respectively). Subgroup analysis showed increased length of stay with patients who underwent general anaesthesia (OR = 1.26, 95% CI:1.04, 1.54; P = 0.02). Conclusion Regional anaesthesia may be considered in patients without contraindications in view of increased risk of postoperative delirium and hypotension, and longer length of stay with general anaesthesia. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm these findings.

A New, Conservative Treatment for Perianal Fistula that May Halve the Need for Surgical Intervention: Case Series

Purpose. In the last two decades, many sphincter preservation techniques have been proposed for the treatment of anal fistula. Since 2011, our surgical team has treated fistulas by sealing them with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). This is performed actually as an outpatient process, without anaesthesia. Methods. Patients were treated with PRF sealant, during the period June 2012–March 2017. The fibrin preparation is applied in the fistulous tract, with no need for any type of anaesthesia, and so the patient can go home immediately afterwards, without further observation. Results. After an average follow-up of 26.49 months, the perianal fistula had healed completely in 52.86% of the patients (n = 37), who each received an average of 1.92 sealant operations. In another 10 cases, the sealing was initially successful, but a relapse occurred during the follow-up period. Conclusion. The outpatient treatment of perianal fistula with PRF is totally harmless, is very low cost and achieves very acceptable results. In our opinion, therefore, this could be considered an appropriate initial treatment for perianal fistula, with surgical treatment being reserved if this approach is unsuccessful, thereby avoiding many complications and producing significant economic savings for the health system.

Analysis of anaesthesia services to calculate national need and supply of anaesthetics in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background In Switzerland, details of current anaesthesia practice are unknown. However, they are urgently needed to manage anaesthesia drug supply in times of drug shortages due to the pandemic. Methods We surveyed all Swiss anaesthesia institutions in April 2020 to determine their annual anaesthesia activity. Together with a detailed analysis on anaesthetic drug use of a large, representative Swiss anaesthesia index institution, calculations and projections for the annual need of anaesthetics in Switzerland were made. Only those drugs have been analysed that are either being used very frequently or that have been classified critical with regard to their supply by the pharmacy of the index institution or the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health. Results The response rate to our questionnaire was 98%. Out of the present 188 Swiss anaesthesia institutions, 185 responded. In Switzerland, the annual number of anaesthesias was 1’071’054 (12’445 per 100’000 inhabitants) with a mean anaesthesia time of 2.03 hours. Teaching hospitals (n = 54) performed more than half (n = 572’231) and non-teaching hospitals (n = 103) provided almost half of all anaesthesias (n = 412’531). Thereby, private hospitals conducted a total of 290’690 anaesthesias. Finally, office-based anaesthesia institutions with mainly outpatients (n = 31) administered 86’292 anaesthesias. Regarding type of anaesthesia provided, two thirds were general anaesthesias (42% total intravenous, 17% inhalation, 8% combined), 20% regional and 12% monitored anaesthesia care. Projecting for example the annual need for propofol in anaesthesia, Switzerland requires 48’573 L of propofol 1% which corresponds to 5’644 L propofol 1% per 100’000 inhabitants every year. Conclusions To actively manage anaesthesia drug supply in the context of the current pandemic, it is mandatory to have a detailed understanding of the number and types of anaesthesias provided. On this basis, the Swiss annual consumption of anaesthetics could be projected and the replenishment organized.

Experiences from a non-COVID hub referral orthopedic trauma hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey

<p><strong>Background:</strong> During the COVID-19 pandemic period, resources should be reorganized to treat the increased burden of COVID-positive patients under the best conditions while simultaneously providing non-deferrable treatment to patients with no suspicion of COVID-19. In this study, we aimed to analyse the trauma patient profile and treatment strategies that emerged in the regional orthopaedic and traumatology hospital during the pandemic period after the implementation of “hub and spoke” organization among the orthopaedic and traumatology clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> This cross-observational study was conducted in a training and research hospital in the field of orthopaedics and traumatology that was converted to a non-COVID referral orthopaedic trauma center during the pandemic. Gender, age, length of hospitalization, duration of trauma, place of trauma, severity of trauma, type of admission, type of anaesthesia and site of trauma were evaluated in the patients that presented between March 16 and May 16, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Of the orthopaedic trauma patients requiring surgery, 169 (62.6%) were men and 101 (37.4%) were women. In comparison of the data with that of the last year, significant increases were observed in the number of home traumas (241.5%), low-energy traumas (87.4%), patients referred from other institutions (328.9%), regional anaesthesia patients (124.2%) and patients with hip traumas (226.7%). The length of hospitalization decreased significantly (p&lt;0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The creation of hub and spoke organization through the cooperation of orthopaedics and traumatology clinics in the region can reduce the burden on pandemic hospitals by isolating trauma patients requiring orthopaedic surgery who were not suspected of COVID-19 and directing them to dedicated orthopaedics and traumatology hospital.</p>