scholarly journals The impact of microbiological cultures on antibiotic prescribing in general internal medicine wards: microbiological evaluation and antibiotic use

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Maraha ◽  
M. Bonten ◽  
H. Fiolet ◽  
E. Stobberingh
2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 814-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Morra ◽  
V. Lo ◽  
S. Quan ◽  
R. Wu ◽  
K. Tran

Summary Objective: To describe the uses of institutional and personal smartphones on General Internal Medicine wards and highlight potential consequences from their use. Methods: A mixed methods study consisting of both quantitative and qualitative research methods was conducted in General Internal Medicine wards across four academic teaching hospitals in Toronto, Ontario. Participants included medical students, residents, attending physicians and allied health professionals. Data collection consisted of work shadowing observations, semi-structured interviews and surveys. Results: Personal smartphones were used for both clinical communication and non-work-related activities. Clinicians used their personal devices to communicate with their medical teams and with other medical specialties and healthcare professionals. Participants understood the risks associated with communicating confidential health information via their personal smartphones, but appear to favor efficiency over privacy issues. From survey responses, 9 of 23 residents (39%) reported using their personal cell phones to email or text patient information that may have contained patient identifiers. Although some residents were observed using their personal smartphones for non-work-related activities, personal use was infrequent and most residents did not engage in this activity. Conclusion: Clinicians are using personal smartphones for work-related purposes on the wards. With the increasing popularity of smartphone devices, it is anticipated that an increasing number of clinicians will use their personal smartphones for clinical work. This trend poses risks to the secure transfer of confidential personal health information and may lead to increased distractions for clinicians. Citation: Tran K, Morra D, Lo V, Quan S, Wu R. The use of smartphones on General Internal Medicine wards: A mixed methods study. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 814–823http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-02-RA-0011


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 399-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Guignard ◽  
Pascal Bonnabry ◽  
Arnaud Perrier ◽  
Pierre Dayer ◽  
Jules Desmeules ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen-Lee Miller ◽  
Scott Reeves ◽  
Merrick Zwarenstein ◽  
Jennifer D. Beales ◽  
Chris Kenaszchuk ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 633-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Reeves ◽  
Kathleen Rice ◽  
Lesley Gotlib Conn ◽  
Karen-Lee Miller ◽  
Chris Kenaszchuk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. flgastro-2021-101965
Author(s):  
Suneil A Raju ◽  
Rebecca Harris ◽  
Charlotte Cook ◽  
Philip Harvey ◽  
Elizabeth Ratcliffe

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted training. Gastroenterology higher specialty training is soon to be reduced from 5 years to 4. The British Society of Gastroenterology Trainees Section biennial survey aims to delineate the impact of COVID-19 on training and the opinions on changes to training.MethodsAn electronic survey allowing for anonymised responses at the point of completion was distributed to all gastroenterology trainees from September to November 2020.ResultsDuring the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, 71.0% of the respondents stated that more than 50% of their clinical time was mostly within general internal medicine. Trainees reported a significant impact on all aspects of their gastroenterology training due to lost training opportunities and increasing service commitments. During the first wave, 88.5% of the respondents reported no access to endoscopy training lists. Since this time, 66.2% of the respondents stated that their endoscopy training lists had restarted. This has resulted in fewer respondents achieving endoscopy accreditation. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused 42.2% of the respondents to consider extending their training to obtain the skills required to complete training. Furthermore, 10.0% of the respondents reported concerns of a delay to completion of training. The majority of respondents (84.2%) reported that they would not feel ready to be a consultant after 4 years of training.ConclusionsReductions in all aspects of gastroenterology training were reported. This is mirrored in anticipated concerns about completion of training in a shorter training programme as proposed in the new curriculum. Work is now required to ensure training is restored following the pandemic.


Author(s):  
Scott Reeves ◽  
Kathleen Rice ◽  
Lesley Gotlib Conn ◽  
Karen-Lee Miller ◽  
Chris Kenaszchuk ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document