Use of Off-Pump and On-Pump CABG Strategies in Current Clinical Practice: The Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program of the State of Washington

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel S. Aldea ◽  
J. Richard Goss ◽  
Edward M. Boyle ◽  
Ronald R. Quinton ◽  
Charles Maynard
2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison R. Snyder ◽  
Tamara C. Valovich McLeod ◽  
Eric L. Sauers

Objective: To provide a basic introduction for athletic training educators about the importance of clinical outcomes measures and to recommend strategies for implementing clinical outcomes assessment education in professional and post-professional athletic training education programs. Background: Outcomes is a frequently used term amongst healthcare professionals; in the contexts of both education and clinical practice. Clinical outcomes assessment refers to the end result of healthcare services taking into account the patient's experiences and expectations. Clinical outcomes assessment education and implementation are critical to the successful implementation of evidence-based practice in athletic training. Description: Clinical outcomes assessments are categorized as either clinician- or patient-based measures. Clinician-based measures are often referred to as objective measures and include things such as range of motion (ROM) and strength, whereas patient-based measures are obtained via questionnaires and interviews that address the patient's perspective on his/her health status. Athletic training education programs should incorporate instruction on the use of both types of measures into their curricula. Clinical Advantages: Educating athletic training students to use clinical outcomes assessment will enable students to practice patient-centered care and provide them with an understanding of how to critically evaluate the evidence to determine optimal patient care. In addition, efforts to educate athletic training students about clinical outcomes assessment may support more widespread implementation of outcomes data collection and strengthen collaborations between clinicians and researchers to determine the effectiveness of athletic training clinical practice.


2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison R. Snyder ◽  
John T. Parsons ◽  
Tamara C. Valovich McLeod ◽  
R. Curtis Bay ◽  
Lori A. Michener ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To present and discuss disablement models and the benefits of using these models as a framework to assess clinical outcomes in athletic training. Background: Conceptual schemes that form the basic architecture for clinical practice, scholarly activities, and health care policy, disablement models have been in use by health care professions since the 1960s. Disablement models are also the foundation for clinical outcomes assessment. Clinical outcomes assessment serves as the measurement tool for patient-oriented evidence and is a necessary component for evidence-based practice. Description: Disablement models provide benefits to health professions through organization of clinical practice and research activities; creation of a common language among health care professionals; facilitation of the delivery of patient-centered, whole-person health care; and justification of interventions based on a comprehensive assessment of the effect of illness or injury on a person's overall health-related quality of life. Currently, the predominant conceptual frameworks of disability in health care are those of the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research and the World Health Organization. Disablement models need to be understood, used, and studied by certified athletic trainers to promote patient-centered care and clinical outcomes assessment for the development of evidence-based practice in athletic training. Clinical and Research Advantages: For clinicians and researchers to determine effective athletic training treatments, prevention programs, and practices, they must understand what is important to patients by collecting patient-oriented evidence. Patient-oriented evidence is the most essential form of outcomes evidence and necessitates an appreciation of all dimensions of health, as outlined by disablement models. The use of disablement models will allow the athletic training profession to communicate, measure, and prioritize the health care needs of patients, which will facilitate organized efforts aimed at assessing the quality of athletic training services and practices and ultimately promote successful evidence-based athletic training practice.


Surgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. 821-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Flum ◽  
Nancy Fisher ◽  
Jeffery Thompson ◽  
Miriam Marcus-Smith ◽  
Michael Florence ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document