scholarly journals Change detection with cross enhancement of high‐ and low‐level change‐related features

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Huang ◽  
Yan Xing ◽  
Mo Zhou ◽  
Ruofei Wang
2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (S2) ◽  
pp. 110-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
JianYa Gong ◽  
HaiGang Sui ◽  
KaiMin Sun ◽  
GuoRui Ma ◽  
JunYi Liu

Author(s):  
Kanji Tanaka ◽  

With recent progress in large-scale map maintenance and long-term map learning, the task of change detection on a large-scale map from a visual image captured by a mobile robot has become a problem of increasing criticality. In this paper, we present an efficient approach of change-classifier-learning, more specifically, in the proposed approach, a collection of place-specific change classifiers is employed. Our approach requires the memorization of only training examples (rather than the classifier itself), which can be further compressed in the form of bag-of-words (BoW). Furthermore, through the proposed approach the most recent map can be incorporated into the classifiers by straightforwardly adding or deleting a few training examples that correspond to these classifiers. The proposed algorithm is applied and evaluated on a practical long-term cross-season change detection system that consists of a large number of place-specific object-level change classifiers.


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan A. Stirk ◽  
Geoffrey Underwood

Author(s):  
Xin Wang ◽  
Peijun Du ◽  
Dongmei Chen ◽  
Sicong Liu ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nathalie Peira ◽  
Armita Golkar ◽  
Maria Larsson ◽  
Stefan Wiens

Various experimental tasks suggest that fear guides attention. However, because these tasks often lack ecological validity, it is unclear to what extent results from these tasks can be generalized to real-life situations. In change detection tasks, a brief interruption of the visual input (i.e., a blank interval or a scene cut) often results in undetected changes in the scene. This setup resembles real-life viewing behavior and is used here to increase ecological validity of the attentional task without compromising control over the stimuli presented. Spider-fearful and nonfearful women detected schematic spiders and flowers that were added to one of two identical background pictures that alternated with a brief blank in between them (i.e., flicker paradigm). Results showed that spider-fearful women detected spiders (but not flowers) faster than did nonfearful women. Because spiders and flowers had similar low-level features, these findings suggest that fear guides attention on the basis of object features rather than simple low-level features.


2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (22) ◽  
pp. 221105
Author(s):  
高敏 Gao Min ◽  
王肖霞 Wang Xiaoxia ◽  
杨风暴 Yang Fengbao ◽  
张宗军 Zhang Zongjun

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document