scholarly journals A systematic review of the concept and clinical applications of bone marrow aspirate concentrate in tendon pathology

SICOT-J ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Imam ◽  
James Holton ◽  
Saman Horriat ◽  
Ahmed S. Negida ◽  
Florian Grubhofer ◽  
...  
SICOT-J ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Imam ◽  
Samer S.S. Mahmoud ◽  
James Holton ◽  
Dalia Abouelmaati ◽  
Yasser Elsherbini ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 2213-2220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Imam ◽  
James Holton ◽  
Lukas Ernstbrunner ◽  
Wojciech Pepke ◽  
Florian Grubhofer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (04) ◽  
pp. 01-11
Author(s):  
Pooja Pithadia

Background: Knee osteoarthritis is the most common musculoskeletal progressive disorder that affects nearly 303 million people worldwide. This condition prevails in 10% males and 13% females among the elders above 60. Although there is conventional nonsurgical and surgical treatment available for knee osteoarthritis, there is a fascinating interest in bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) as well as adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSC), including enzymatically treated stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and mechanically treated (microfat/nanofat) injections among physicians. Hence, this systematic review aims to determine the efficacy of BMAC and AD-MSCs (enzyme and mechanically treated) injections for knee osteoarthritis treatment. Methods: A systematic review was performed on the following data sources (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) published on March 31, 2021. The keywords or MeSH terms include 'Knee Osteoarthritis with 'Bone marrow aspirate concentrate' OR 'BMAC' or with 'Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSC)' or with 'Stromal vascular fraction' OR 'SVF' or 'Mechanically treated AD-MSC (mfat/nanofat)'. In addition, the retrieved articles were further reviewed to identify relevant research studies. Results: The authors reviewed and tabulated data based on the year of study, study type, therapy protocol, patient population, outcome measures, and interpretation. Among the 382 records screened, 43 studies (16 on BMAC and 27 on AD-MSCs) were included in the systematic review study. Among them, only 5 were randomized controlled trials. These selected studies demonstrated short-term positive outcomes such as improvement in knee pain and function with no adverse side effects. Moreover, researchers reported varied administration methods of BMAC or AD-MSC either as standalone or in combination with other conservative procedures such as PRP (Platelets Rich Plasma), HA (Hyaluronic acid), or surgery. Conclusions: BMAC and AD-MSC (enzymatically and mechanically treated) injections prove safer and more efficacious in patients with knee osteoarthritis for a shorter duration of 2 years. However, the available literature lacks high-quality studies with no varied clinical settings and long-term follow-up of more than two years.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 1366-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iain R. Murray ◽  
Patrick G. Robinson ◽  
Christopher C. West ◽  
Ewan B. Goudie ◽  
Li Y. Yong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110188
Author(s):  
Laura E. Keeling ◽  
John W. Belk ◽  
Matthew J. Kraeutler ◽  
Alexandra C. Kallner ◽  
Adam Lindsay ◽  
...  

Background: Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) has emerged as a therapeutic option for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). Purpose: To systematically review the literature to evaluate the efficacy of isolated BMAC injection in the treatment of OA of the knee joint. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 2020 to identify human studies that assessed the clinical outcomes of isolated BMAC injection for the treatment of knee OA. The electronic search strategy used was “bone marrow aspirate concentrate knee osteoarthritis.” Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 299 knees with a mean follow-up of 12.9 months (range, 6-30 months). Of all patient-reported outcomes assessed across studies, 34 of 36 (94.4%) demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to latest follow-up ( P < .05). Five studies evaluating numerical pain scores (visual analog scale and Numeric Rating Scale) reported significant improvements in pain level at final follow-up ( P < .01). However, 3 comparative studies evaluating BMAC in relation to other therapeutic injections failed to demonstrate the clinical superiority of BMAC. Conclusion: The BMAC injection is effective in improving pain and patient-reported outcomes in patients with knee OA at short- to midterm follow-up. Nevertheless, BMAC has not demonstrated clinical superiority in relation to other biologic therapies commonly used in the treatment of OA, including platelet-rich plasma and microfragmented adipose tissue, or in relation to placebo. The high cost of the BMAC injection in comparison with other biologic and nonoperative treatment modalities may limit its utility despite demonstrable clinical benefit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document