scholarly journals Concrete use of the joint coordinate system for the quantification of articular rotations in the digital joints of the horse

2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Degueurce ◽  
Henry Chateau ◽  
Viviane Pasqui-Boutard ◽  
Philippe Pourcelot ◽  
Fabrice Audigi� ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 543-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ge Wu ◽  
Sorin Siegler ◽  
Paul Allard ◽  
Chris Kirtley ◽  
Alberto Leardini ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gengxiang Wang

The moving platform of the 4-SPS/CU (S is the spherical joint, P is the prismatic joint, C is the cylindrical joint, U is the universal joint) parallel mechanism is treated as a thin-plate element based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation due to its physical characteristic. In order to eliminate high-frequency modes caused by the coupling between membrane and bending effects, the elastic mid-surface approach is used to evaluate the elastic force of the flexible moving platform. In order to formulate constraint equations between the flexible body and the rigid body, the tangent frame is introduced to define the joint coordinate system that is rigidly attached to the node at the joint, which is convenient for determining the constant vector in the joint coordinate system. The dynamics model of the parallel mechanism with the flexible moving platform is built based on the equation of motion. The simulation results show that the vibration frequency caused by the flexible body will be increased with the increasing stiffness of the material, and the kinematic trajectory and dynamics performance of the parallel mechanism are affected seriously when the smaller Young’s modulus is used, which illustrates that the effect of the flexible moving platform on the dynamic performance of the parallel mechanism should not be ignored.


2003 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph K. Leader ◽  
J.Robert Boston ◽  
Richard E. Debski ◽  
Thomas E. Rudy

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 586-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard J. Hillstrom ◽  
Rohit Garg ◽  
Andrew Kraszewski ◽  
Mark Lenhoff ◽  
Timothy Carter ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to develop a three-dimensional (3D) motion analysis based anatomical wrist joint coordinate system for measurement of in-vivo wrist kinematics. The convergent validity and reliability of the 3D motion analysis implementation was quantified and compared with manual and electrogoniometry techniques on 10 cadaveric specimens. Fluoroscopic measurements were used as the reference. The 3D motion analysis measurements (mean absolute difference [MAD] = 3.6°) were significantly less different (P < .005) than manual goniometry (MAD = 5.7°) but not (P = .066, power = 0.45) electrogoniometry (MAD = 5.0°) compared with fluoroscopy. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC[2,1]) was highest for 3D motion analysis compared with manual and electrogoniometry, suggesting better reliability for this technique. To demonstrate the utility of this new wrist joint coordinate system, normative data from 10 healthy subjects was obtained while throwing a dart.


1993 ◽  
Vol 115 (4A) ◽  
pp. 344-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. K. Cole ◽  
B. M. Nigg ◽  
J. L. Ronsky ◽  
M. R. Yeadon

The selection of an appropriate and/or standardized method for representing 3-D joint attitude and motion is a topic of popular debate in the field of biomechanics. The joint coordinate system (JCS) is one method that has seen considerable use in the literature. The JCS consists of an axis fixed in the proximal segment, an axis fixed in the distal segment, and a “floating” axis. There has not been general agreement in the literature on how to select the body fixed axes of the JCS. The purpose of this paper is to propose a single definition of the body fixed axes of the JCS. The two most commonly used sets of body fixed axes are compared and the differences between them quantified. These differences are shown to be relevant in terms of practical applications of the JCS. Argumentation is provided to support a proposal for a standardized selection of body fixed axes of the JCS consisting of the axis eˆ1 embedded in the proximal segment and chosen to represent flexion-extension, the “floating” axis eˆ2 chosen to represent ad-abduction, and the axis eˆ3 embedded in the distal segment and chosen to represent axial rotation of that segment. The algorithms for the JCS are then documented using generalized terminology.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcio de Oliveira Nunes ◽  
Luciano Luporini Menegaldo ◽  
Gustavo Leporace de Oliveira Lomelino Soares ◽  
Alexandre Visintainer Pino ◽  
Marcio Nogueira de Souza

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce A. MacWilliams ◽  
Roy B. Davis

The joint coordinate system convention proposed by Grood and Suntay has been widely adopted, but often misrepresented. Previous work has argued by logical explanation of the approach that the joint coordinate system is a set of Euler or Cardan angles. The current work offers both an explanation and mathematical proof that the joint coordinate system convention is equivalent to a Cardan angle sequence, thereby demonstrating the joint coordinate system angles are both sequence dependent and orthogonal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document