Liver Biopsy for the Selection of Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis for Clinical Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian A. Rowe ◽  
Richard Parker
2020 ◽  
pp. 209-220
Author(s):  
David K. C. Cooper ◽  
Abhijit Jagdale ◽  
Roslynn B. Mannon ◽  
Vineeta Kumar ◽  
Robert Gaston ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 8534
Author(s):  
Alessia Pellerino ◽  
Valeria Internò ◽  
Francesca Mo ◽  
Federica Franchino ◽  
Riccardo Soffietti ◽  
...  

The management of breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved in the last 20 years. The improvement of systemic therapy allows a remarkable control of extracranial disease. However, brain (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are frequent complications of advanced BC and represent a challenging issue for clinicians. Some prognostic scales designed for metastatic BC have been employed to select fit patients for adequate therapy and enrollment in clinical trials. Different systemic drugs, such as targeted therapies with either monoclonal antibodies or small tyrosine kinase molecules, or modified chemotherapeutic agents are under investigation. Major aims are to improve the penetration of active drugs through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) or brain–tumor barrier (BTB), and establish the best sequence and timing of radiotherapy and systemic therapy to avoid neurocognitive impairment. Moreover, pharmacologic prevention is a new concept driven by the efficacy of targeted agents on macrometastases from specific molecular subgroups. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and molecular factors involved in the selection of patients for local and/or systemic therapy, as well as the results of clinical trials on advanced BC. Moreover, insight on promising therapeutic options and potential directions of future therapeutic targets against BBB and microenvironment are discussed.


1987 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
Alastair Compston

1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. MacRae

This article considers the distinction between “explanatory” and “pragmatic” aims in clinical trials—the distinction between testing a biological hypothesis and providing evidence to permit a choice between alternative treatment policies. The choice of treatments to compare, the selection of patients for the trial, the study size, and how the treatment comparison should be made are among the matters discussed. In general, where explanatory and pragmatic aims conflict, the pragmatic aim will often take priority.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e83279 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Pinato ◽  
Chara Stavraka ◽  
Michael J. Flynn ◽  
Martin D. Forster ◽  
Séan M. O'Cathail ◽  
...  

Lung ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 194 (6) ◽  
pp. 967-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karlijn J.G. Schulkes ◽  
Cindy Nguyen ◽  
Frederiek van den Bos ◽  
Leontine J.R. van Elden ◽  
Marije E. Hamaker

BMJ ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 4 (5888) ◽  
pp. 358-358
Author(s):  
P. Tyrer

2017 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 1551-1558 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K.C. Cooper ◽  
Martin Wijkstrom ◽  
Sundaram Hariharan ◽  
Joshua L. Chan ◽  
Avneesh Singh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document