Selection of Patients in Ongoing Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Lung ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 194 (6) ◽  
pp. 967-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karlijn J.G. Schulkes ◽  
Cindy Nguyen ◽  
Frederiek van den Bos ◽  
Leontine J.R. van Elden ◽  
Marije E. Hamaker
2020 ◽  
pp. 209-220
Author(s):  
David K. C. Cooper ◽  
Abhijit Jagdale ◽  
Roslynn B. Mannon ◽  
Vineeta Kumar ◽  
Robert Gaston ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 8534
Author(s):  
Alessia Pellerino ◽  
Valeria Internò ◽  
Francesca Mo ◽  
Federica Franchino ◽  
Riccardo Soffietti ◽  
...  

The management of breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved in the last 20 years. The improvement of systemic therapy allows a remarkable control of extracranial disease. However, brain (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are frequent complications of advanced BC and represent a challenging issue for clinicians. Some prognostic scales designed for metastatic BC have been employed to select fit patients for adequate therapy and enrollment in clinical trials. Different systemic drugs, such as targeted therapies with either monoclonal antibodies or small tyrosine kinase molecules, or modified chemotherapeutic agents are under investigation. Major aims are to improve the penetration of active drugs through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) or brain–tumor barrier (BTB), and establish the best sequence and timing of radiotherapy and systemic therapy to avoid neurocognitive impairment. Moreover, pharmacologic prevention is a new concept driven by the efficacy of targeted agents on macrometastases from specific molecular subgroups. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and molecular factors involved in the selection of patients for local and/or systemic therapy, as well as the results of clinical trials on advanced BC. Moreover, insight on promising therapeutic options and potential directions of future therapeutic targets against BBB and microenvironment are discussed.


1987 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
Alastair Compston

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Rengifo ◽  
Rancés Blanco ◽  
Damián Blanco ◽  
Mercedes Cedeño ◽  
Milagros Frómeta ◽  
...  

Adequate methods to identify which lung cancer patients are most likely to benefit from the targeted drugs against both epidermal growth factor receptor/epidermal growth factor (EGFR/EGF) are needed. For this reason, we evaluated both the tissue reactivity of ior egf/r3 monoclonal antibody (Mab) in human lung carcinomas and its biological activity in NCI-H125 cells. Additionally, we assessed the tissue expression of EGF using two Mabs, CB-EGF1 and CB-EGF2. The overexpression of EGFR was detected in 33.33% and 62.71% of small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), respectively. The ability of ior egf/r3 Mab to bind the extracellular domain of EGFR inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis in NCI-H125 cells was also demonstrated. The EGF expression was observed in about 17% and 70% of SCLC and NSCLC, respectively. However, differences in the reactivity of CB-EGF1 and CB-EGF2 were evidenced. A dual expression of EGFR and EGF was observed in 16.67% and 57.63% of SCLC and NSCLC patients, respectively. But, a correlation between them was only obtained in NSCLC. Our results permit to recommend the development of diagnostic kits using ior egf/r3 and/or CB-EGF1 Mabs in order to achieve a better selection of patients to EGFR/EGF-targeting treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document