Options for Incidental Mitral Regurgitation Found During Aortic Valve Surgery for Aortic Regurgitation: An Evidence-Based Clinical Update for the Perioperative Echocardiographer

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 555-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Malhotra ◽  
Harish Ramakrishna ◽  
Jacob T. Gutsche ◽  
Prakash A. Patel ◽  
Lourdes Al-Ghofaily ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 145749692098742
Author(s):  
A. Husso ◽  
T. Riekkinen ◽  
A. Rissanen ◽  
J. Ollila ◽  
A. Valtola

Background and Aims: It is not uncommon that patients requiring valve surgery have several simultaneous valvular dysfunctions. Combined aortic and mitral valve surgery is the most common form of double-valve surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze and present the outcomes of simultaneous aortic and mitral valve surgery in a single center in a real-life setting. Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 150 patients operated in the Kuopio University Hospital from 2004 to 2020. All patients undergoing concomitant mitral and aortic valve surgery were included. Four groups were formed based on either the etiology or pathophysiology of the valvular dysfunction. The most common combination was mitral regurgitation with aortic regurgitation ( n = 72, 48%), followed by mitral regurgitation with aortic stenosis ( n = 37, 25%), endocarditis ( n = 29, 19%), and mitral stenosis with aortic regurgitation or stenosis ( n = 12, 8%). Concomitant coronary artery revascularization was performed in 37 (25%) patients and tricuspid valve repair in 26 (17%) patients. Results: Operative mortality was 2% and 30-day mortality was 7%. Overall survival was 86%, 78%, and 61% in 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Patients with endocarditis were significantly more morbid, and more often than other patients had to undergo an emergency operation. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of early and late survival. In the overall cohort, the EuroSCORE II value, increased pulmonary artery pressure, decreased glomerular filtration, and length of the operation displayed a negative correlation with survival. Conclusion: Despite the challenging nature of multivalvular heart disease, surgery is a safe method of treatment with good short- and long-term outcomes.


Author(s):  
Saul G Myerson ◽  
Theodoros D Karamitsos ◽  
Jane M Francis ◽  
Adrian P Banning ◽  
Stefan Neubauer

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1105-1111
Author(s):  
E Mara Vollema ◽  
Gurpreet K Singh ◽  
Edgard A Prihadi ◽  
Madelien V Regeer ◽  
See Hooi Ewe ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Pressure overload in aortic stenosis (AS) and both pressure and volume overload in aortic regurgitation (AR) induce concentric and eccentric hypertrophy, respectively. These structural changes influence left ventricular (LV) mechanics, but little is known about the time course of LV remodelling and mechanics after aortic valve surgery (AVR) and its differences in AS vs. AR. The present study aimed to characterize the time course of LV mass index (LVMI) and LV mechanics [by LV global longitudinal strain (LV GLS)] after AVR in AS vs. AR. Methods and results Two hundred and eleven (61 ± 14 years, 61% male) patients with severe AS (63%) or AR (37%) undergoing surgical AVR with routine echocardiographic follow-up at 1, 2, and/or 5 years were evaluated. Before AVR, LVMI was larger in AR patients compared with AS. Both groups showed moderately impaired LV GLS, but preserved LV ejection fraction. After surgery, both groups showed LV mass regression, although a more pronounced decline was seen in AR patients. Improvement in LV GLS was observed in both groups, but characterized by an initial decline in AR patients while LV GLS in AS patients remained initially stable. Conclusion In severe AS and AR patients undergoing AVR, LV mass regression and changes in LV GLS are similar despite different LV remodelling before AVR. In AR, relief of volume overload led to reduction in LVMI and an initial decline in LV GLS. In contrast, relief of pressure overload in AS was characterized by a stable LV GLS and more sustained LV mass regression.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1458-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madelien V. Regeer ◽  
Michel I. M. Versteegh ◽  
Nina Ajmone Marsan ◽  
Martin J. Schalij ◽  
Robert J. M. Klautz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document