Faculty Opinions recommendation of Management of moderate secondary mitral regurgitation at the time of aortic valve surgery.

Author(s):  
Edward Savage
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonçalo F. Coutinho ◽  
Pedro M. Correia ◽  
Rita Pancas ◽  
Manuel J. Antunes

2021 ◽  
pp. 145749692098742
Author(s):  
A. Husso ◽  
T. Riekkinen ◽  
A. Rissanen ◽  
J. Ollila ◽  
A. Valtola

Background and Aims: It is not uncommon that patients requiring valve surgery have several simultaneous valvular dysfunctions. Combined aortic and mitral valve surgery is the most common form of double-valve surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze and present the outcomes of simultaneous aortic and mitral valve surgery in a single center in a real-life setting. Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 150 patients operated in the Kuopio University Hospital from 2004 to 2020. All patients undergoing concomitant mitral and aortic valve surgery were included. Four groups were formed based on either the etiology or pathophysiology of the valvular dysfunction. The most common combination was mitral regurgitation with aortic regurgitation ( n = 72, 48%), followed by mitral regurgitation with aortic stenosis ( n = 37, 25%), endocarditis ( n = 29, 19%), and mitral stenosis with aortic regurgitation or stenosis ( n = 12, 8%). Concomitant coronary artery revascularization was performed in 37 (25%) patients and tricuspid valve repair in 26 (17%) patients. Results: Operative mortality was 2% and 30-day mortality was 7%. Overall survival was 86%, 78%, and 61% in 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Patients with endocarditis were significantly more morbid, and more often than other patients had to undergo an emergency operation. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of early and late survival. In the overall cohort, the EuroSCORE II value, increased pulmonary artery pressure, decreased glomerular filtration, and length of the operation displayed a negative correlation with survival. Conclusion: Despite the challenging nature of multivalvular heart disease, surgery is a safe method of treatment with good short- and long-term outcomes.


2008 ◽  
Vol 56 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Reiter ◽  
S Wipper ◽  
J Schoenebeck ◽  
A Beinke ◽  
D Boehm ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evaldas Girdauskas ◽  
Kushtrim Disha ◽  
Andres Espinoza ◽  
Martin Misfeld ◽  
Hermann Reichenspurner ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
V. M. Nazarov ◽  
S. I. Zheleznev ◽  
I. I. Demin ◽  
K. A. Smolyaninov ◽  
A. V. Afanasev ◽  
...  

To evaluate the impact of surgical strategy in concomitant mitral valve surgery or isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with moderate secondary mitral regurgitation (MR), 1 574 patients underwent AVR over a period from January 2003 to December 2011. 241 patients had secondary MR 2+ and constituted the study population. Patients were stratified into two groups, those without concomitant mitral valve surgery (Group A, n = 113) and with it (Group B, n = 128). It was found out that AVR plastic correction of MI reduces its recurrence during short-term follow-up but increases the intervention time leading to an insignificant rise in lethality. In patients with aortic stenosis the age exceeding 70 years and the presence of atrial fibrillation are found to be the most significant predictors of preservation of residual mitral regurgitation in the early postoperative period, while more indicative for patients with aortic insufficiency is the presence of tricuspid regurgitation grade 2 or higher.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document