scholarly journals 101 Quantifying aortic regurgitation with CMR can predict patients requiring aortic valve surgery

Author(s):  
Saul G Myerson ◽  
Theodoros D Karamitsos ◽  
Jane M Francis ◽  
Adrian P Banning ◽  
Stefan Neubauer
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1105-1111
Author(s):  
E Mara Vollema ◽  
Gurpreet K Singh ◽  
Edgard A Prihadi ◽  
Madelien V Regeer ◽  
See Hooi Ewe ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Pressure overload in aortic stenosis (AS) and both pressure and volume overload in aortic regurgitation (AR) induce concentric and eccentric hypertrophy, respectively. These structural changes influence left ventricular (LV) mechanics, but little is known about the time course of LV remodelling and mechanics after aortic valve surgery (AVR) and its differences in AS vs. AR. The present study aimed to characterize the time course of LV mass index (LVMI) and LV mechanics [by LV global longitudinal strain (LV GLS)] after AVR in AS vs. AR. Methods and results Two hundred and eleven (61 ± 14 years, 61% male) patients with severe AS (63%) or AR (37%) undergoing surgical AVR with routine echocardiographic follow-up at 1, 2, and/or 5 years were evaluated. Before AVR, LVMI was larger in AR patients compared with AS. Both groups showed moderately impaired LV GLS, but preserved LV ejection fraction. After surgery, both groups showed LV mass regression, although a more pronounced decline was seen in AR patients. Improvement in LV GLS was observed in both groups, but characterized by an initial decline in AR patients while LV GLS in AS patients remained initially stable. Conclusion In severe AS and AR patients undergoing AVR, LV mass regression and changes in LV GLS are similar despite different LV remodelling before AVR. In AR, relief of volume overload led to reduction in LVMI and an initial decline in LV GLS. In contrast, relief of pressure overload in AS was characterized by a stable LV GLS and more sustained LV mass regression.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1458-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madelien V. Regeer ◽  
Michel I. M. Versteegh ◽  
Nina Ajmone Marsan ◽  
Martin J. Schalij ◽  
Robert J. M. Klautz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
M. Faber ◽  
C. Sonne ◽  
S. Rosner ◽  
H. Persch ◽  
W. Reinhard ◽  
...  

AbstractTo compare the ability of cardiac magnetic resonance tomography (CMR) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to predict the need for valve surgery in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation on a mid-term basis. 66 individuals underwent assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) both in CMR and TTE between August 2012 and April 2017. The follow-up rate was 76% with a median of 5.1 years. Cox proportional hazards method was used to assess the association of the time-to-aortic-valve-surgery, including valve replacement and reconstruction, and imaging parameters. A direct comparison of most predictive CMR and echocardiographic parameters was performed by using nested-factor-models. Sixteen patients (32%) were treated with aortic valve surgery during follow-up. Aortic valve insufficiency parameters, both of echocardiography and CMR, showed good discriminative and predictive power regarding the need of valve surgery. Within all examined parameters AR gradation derived by CMR correlated best with outcome [χ2 = 27.1; HR 12.2 (95% CI: 4.56, 36.8); (p < 0.0001)]. In direct comparison of both modalities, CMR assessment provided additive prognostic power beyond echocardiographic assessment of AR but not vice versa (improvement of χ2 from 21.4 to 28.4; p = 0.008). Nested model analysis demonstrated an overall better correlation with outcome by using both modalities compared with using echo alone with the best improvement in the moderate to severe AR range with an echo grade II out of III and a regurgitation fraction of 32% in CMR. This study corroborates the capability of CMR in direct quantification of AR and its role for guiding further treatment decisions particularly in patients with moderate AR in echocardiography.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Garcia Martin ◽  
M Abellas Sequeiros ◽  
L M Rincon Diaz ◽  
A Gonzalez Gomez ◽  
J M Monteagudo Ruiz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The management of patients with asymptomatic significant aortic regurgitation (sAR) is often challenging and appropriate timing of aortic valve surgery remains controversial. There are no strong indicators to recommend early surgery in patients with sAR, however delaying the time for the intervention could bring potential negative consequences, such as the risk of permanent left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. The prognostic value of diastolic parameters has been demonstrated in several cardiac diseases. In particular, left atrial (LA) function has been shown to be an important determinant of morbimortality. Purpose The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic significance of diastolic function parameters, included LA strain, in asymptomatic patients with sAR and to evaluate whether these parameters could help to identify patients at high risk of adverse events that could benefit from early cardiac surgery. Methods From February 2013 to November 2019 consecutive asymptomatic patients with chronic sAR evaluated in the Heart Valve Clinic with a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) were included. Combined clinical endpoint included hospital admission due to heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, or indication for aortic valve surgery. Results A total of 126 patients were included. During a mean follow up of 33±19 month, 25 (19.8%) patients reached the combined end-point. In a sub-group of 57 patients with TTE performed in the Philips stations, LA auto-strain analysis was obtained (figure 1). Univariate analysis showed that LV volumes, LVEF, E wave, E/e' ratio, LA volume and LA reservoir strain (LASr) were significant predictors of events, whereas LA diameter, and LV diastolic diameters were not. Multivariate model 1 that tested all echocardiographic variables statistically significant in the univariate model showed that the LVEDV and E/e' ratio, were significant predictors of events. In the subgroup of patients with LA auto-strain analyzed, a second multivariable model was built, including the previous significant variables for the first model (LVEDV and E/e' ratio), as well as the LA volume and LASr. It showed that LVEDV and LASr were the most significant predictors of cardiovascular events (figure 2). Conclusions In this population of asymptomatic patients with sAR and normal LV systolic function, baseline diastolic parameters were prognostic markers of cardiovascular events; among them, LA reservoir strain played a strong independent predictor role. In addition, our results also showed that LV volumes had greater prognostic value that LV diameters in patients with asymptomatic sAR. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1 Figure 2


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document