Komplikationen der Leberzirrhose – medikamentöse versus interventionelle Therapie

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (18) ◽  
pp. 1259-1266
Author(s):  
Lukas Sturm ◽  
Martin Rössle ◽  
Michael Schultheiß

AbstractThe prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis is impaired by complications such as variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy and hepatocellular carcinoma. A steadily increasing array of treatment options for these complications is available, including pharmaceutical treatment (e. g. beta blockers for varices or diuretics for ascites), endoscopic treatment (e. g. band ligation of varices), radiological interventions (e. g. transjugular shunt, transarterial chemoembolization) and liver transplantation. Most of the complications occur due to portal hypertension. Therefore, decompressive treatment by implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) an effective therapeutic option for many complications of liver cirrhosis. Its main indications are acute and recurrent variceal bleeding in patients with advanced disease as well as refractory ascites. The TIPS does not affect options of abdominal surgery and may therefore be used as a bridge to liver transplantation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (31) ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
T. Bentsa ◽  

Introduction. Liver cirrhosis (LC) is an important medical and socio-economic problem not only in Ukraine, but throughout the world. The urgency of this disease is due to its significant spread, increase of the number of etiological factors, as well as the occurrence of severe complications, which often leads to death. The prognosis depends on several factors, such as etiology, the severity of liver damage, the presence of complications and concomitant diseases. The aim of the study. To review the scientific literature and summarize the published studies devoted to the study of the etiology, classification, clinical picture and diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. Materials and methods. The content analysis, the method of systemic and comparative analysis, the bibliosemantic method of studying the current scientific research on the etiology, classification, clinical picture and diagnosis of LC were used. The search for sources was carried out in scientometric databases: PubMed-NCBI, Medline, Research Gate, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the keywords: liver cirrhosis, diagnosis, treatment. 37 literary sources were selected and analyzed. Results. LC is currently ranked 11th among the most common causes of death. The common causes of LC are chronic alcohol intoxication and viral hepatitis B, C, and D. LC is represented by an increase in severity, which is characterized by the lesions of the liver parenchyma with necrosis, dystrophy of hepatocytes, their nodular regeneration, as well as its interstitium with diffuse proliferation of connective tissue, leading to liver failure and portal hypertension. Most patients with cirrhosis remain asymptomatic until they develop decompensated LC. Despite the existence of a number of LC classifications – by morphology, etiology, severity, course, hepatocellular insufficiency stage, the severity of the disease is usually assessed by evaluation of the hepatic functional reserve (according to the C. G. Child – R. N. Pugh classification). Patients with LC often have life-threatening conditions such as variceal hemorrhages, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome. Variceal bleeding is a major complication of portal hypertension, which is associated with significant mortality. Ascites represents the most common decompensating event in patients with LC. The appearance of ascites is strongly related to portal hypertension, which leads to splanchnic arterial vasodilation, reduction of the effective circulating volume, activation of endogenous vasoconstrictor systems, and avid sodium and water retention in the kidneys. Bacterial translocation further worsens hemodynamic alterations of patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Ascites is also associated with a high risk of developing the further complications of cirrhosis such as dilutional hyponatremia, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and/or other bacterial infections and acute kidney injury. Pharmacotherapy for LC should be implemented in accordance with up-to-date guidelines and in conjunction with etiology management, nutritional optimization and patients’ education. The main treatment of uncomplicated ascites is diuretics such as spironolactone in combination with a loop one. Vasoconstrictors and albumin are recommended for the treatment of refractory ascites. In its turn antibiotics play a well-established role in the treatment and prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The administration of vasopressor terlipressin and albumin is recommended for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome. Pharmacological therapy of variceal bleeding aims to decrease the portal pressure by acting on its pathophysiological mechanisms such as increased hepatic vascular tone and splanchnic vasodilatation. Propranolol blocks the β-1 in the heart and the peripheral β-2 adrenergic receptors. β-1 blockade of cardiac receptors reduces heart rate, cardiac output and subsequently decreases flow into splanchnic circulation. β-2 blockade leads to unopposed α-1 adrenergic activity that causes splanchnic vasoconstriction and reduction of portal inflow. Both effects contribute to reduction in portal pressure. Carvedilol is more powerful in reducing hepatic venous pressure gradient than traditional nonselective β-blockers. Endoscopic treatment in many cases is used for the variceal bleeding (eg., ligation of the esophageal varices and tissue glue usage for the gastric varices). A shunt (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting – TIPS) is used to treat severe and often repeat variceal hemorrhage or refractory ascites. Non-selective β-blockers effectively reduce variceal re-bleeding risk in LC patients with moderate/large varices. Conclusions. Liver cirrhosis is one of the most dangerous multi-organ diseases of a human with multiple pathogenetic links, the causes of which invariably remain hepatitis viruses, alcohol, toxic substances, drugs, ultraviolet radiation, genetic factors, some chronic diseases of the internal organs. There are a number of classifications of liver cirrhosis – by morphology, etiology, severity, course, severity of hepatocellular insufficiency etc. Examination of this category of patients requires timeliness, scrupulousness, compliance with a comprehensive approach using modern clinical, laboratory and instrumental methods. During the objective examination of a patient a doctor traditionally draws attention to the presence of telangiectasia, palmar erythema, jaundice, “raspberry” tongue, scratching marks, gynecomastia in men, ascites and “caput medusae”, during the palpation the liver is enlarged, dense, with a sharp lower edge, spleen is enlarged. Among the laboratory methods, in addition to routine ones, the immunological tests are used, among the main instrumental examination – ultrasound, computed tomography, indirect elastometry of the liver or Fibroscan, esophagogastrofibroscopy, puncture biopsy of the liver, in particular modern ones – vibrational transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography. Although liver cirrhosis is the final stage of liver disease, this diagnosis cannot be considered a verdict for a patient, because today there are quite effective treatments using the principles of differentiation – the impact on the etiological factor, liver state and comorbid lesions and their complications often allows if not to cure the patient, then to prevent the negative disease course. Among them, there are diet, the use of etiotropic drugs, intestinal sanitation, correction of clinical and laboratory syndromes, portal hypertension syndrome, endothelial and autonomic dysfunction as causes of comorbid lesions and their complications.


2021 ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
T. M. Bentsa

This article provides information about the pharmacotherapy of liver cirrhosis (LC) and its complications, such as variceal hemorrhage, ascites, increased risk of bacterial infection, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome LC is a major healthcare problem and is associated with an increased mortality due to the development of complications. LC is currently the 11th most common cause of death globally. Prognosis of LC is highly variable and influenced by several variables, such as etiology, severity of liver disease, presence of complications and comorbidities. In advanced cirrhosis, survival decreases to one or two years. Pharmacotherapy for LC should be implemented in accordance with up-to-date guidelines and in conjunction with aetiology management, nutritional optimisation and patient education. The main treatment of uncomplicated ascites is diuretics such as spironolactone in combination with a loop diuretic. For treatment refractory ascites vasoconstrictors and albumin are recommended. Antibiotics play a well-established role in the treatment and prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. For hepatorenal syndrome, the administration of vasopressor terlipressin and albumin is recommended. Endoscopic treatment is used for variceal bleeding (for example, ligation for esophageal varices and tissue glue for gastric varices). A shunt (TIPS) is used to treat severe or repeat variceal hemorrhage or refractory ascites. Non-selective beta-blockers effectively reduce variceal re-bleeding risk in LC patients with moderate/large varices. Thus, the treatment of LC as one of the most formidable multiorgan pathologies involves a comprehensive approach aimed at the correction of the main pathology and the treatment and prevention of its complications.


PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e7855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beata Kasztelan-Szczerbinska ◽  
Halina Cichoz-Lach

Refractory ascites (RA) refers to ascites that cannot be mobilized or that has an early recurrence that cannot be prevented by medical therapy. Every year, 5–10% of patients with liver cirrhosis and with an accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity develop RA while undergoing standard treatment (low sodium diet and diuretic dose up to 400 mg/day of spironolactone and 160 mg/day of furosemide). Liver cirrhosis accounts for marked alterations in the splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics, causing hypovolemia and arterial hypotension. The consequent activation of renin-angiotensin and sympathetic systems and increased renal sodium re-absorption occurs during the course of the disease. Cirrhotic patients with RA have poor prognoses and are at risk of developing serious complications. Different treatment options are available, but only liver transplantation may improve the survival of such patients.


Author(s):  
B. González Astorga ◽  
F. Salvà Ballabrera ◽  
E. Aranda Aguilar ◽  
E. Élez Fernández ◽  
P. García-Alfonso ◽  
...  

AbstractColorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. For metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, it is recommended, as first-line treatment, chemotherapy (CT) based on doublet cytotoxic combinations of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). In addition to CT, biological (targeted agents) are indicated in the first-line treatment, unless contraindicated. In this context, most of mCRC patients are likely to progress and to change from first line to second line treatment when they develop resistance to first-line treatment options. It is in this second line setting where Aflibercept offers an alternative and effective therapeutic option, thought its specific mechanism of action for different patient’s profile: RAS mutant, RAS wild-type (wt), BRAF mutant, potentially resectable and elderly patients. In this paper, a panel of experienced oncologists specialized in the management of mCRC experts have reviewed and selected scientific evidence focused on Aflibercept as an alternative treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Abhijit L. Salaskar ◽  
Steven Zangan ◽  
Anjana Pillai ◽  
Talia Baker

Abstract Background Percutaneous trans-splenic portal vein recanalization (PVR) has been reported for facilitation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), however has not been applied to patients undergoing direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPS). We report the utilization of trans-splenic-PVR with DIPS creation in a patient with chronic portal and hepatic vein occlusions undergoing liver transplantation evaluation. Case presentation A 48-year-old male with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis complicated by refractory ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding underwent CT that demonstrated chronic occlusion of the hepatic veins (HV), extrahepatic portal vein (PV), and superior mesenteric vein (SMV). Due to failed attempts at TIPS at outside institutions, interventional radiology was consulted for portal vein recanalization (PVR) with TIPS to treat the portal hypertension and ascites and also facilitate an end-to-end PV anastomosis at transplantation. After an initial hepatic venogram confirmed chronic HV occlusion, a DIPS with trans-splenic PVR was planned. The splenic vein was accessed under sonographic guidance using a micropuncture set and subsequently upsized to a 6 French sheath over a stiff guidewire. A splenic venogram via this access confirmed occlusion of the PV with drainage of the splenic vein (SV) through gastric varices. The thrombosed PV was then recanalized and angioplastied to restore PV flow via the transsplenic approach. A transjugular liver access kit with a modified 21-gauge needle was advanced into the IVC through the internal jugular vein (IJV) sheath and directed towards the target snare in PV. The needle was used to subsequently puncture the PV through the caudate lobe and facilitate placement of a wire into the SV. The initial portosystemic gradient (PSG) was 20 mmHg. The IJV sheath was advanced through the hepatic parenchymal tract into the main-PV and a stent-graft was placed across the main PV and into the IVC. A portal venogram demonstrated brisk blood flow through the DIPS, resolution of varices and a PSG of 8 mmHg. One month after the procedure, the patient had a significant reduction in ascites and MELD-NA score. Patient is currently listed and awaiting transplantation. Conclusions In the setting of chronically occluded portal and hepatic veins, trans-splenic PVR DIPS may serve as an effective bridge to liver transplantation by facilitating an end to end portal vein anastomosis.


2021 ◽  
pp. 152692482110028
Author(s):  
Alberto Ferrarese ◽  
Patrizia Burra

Liver transplantation is considered an effective therapeutic option for Wilson’s disease (WD) patients with hepatic phenotype, since it removes the inherited defects of copper metabolism, and is associated with excellent graft and patient outcomes. The role of liver transplantation in WD patients with mixed hepatic and neuropsychiatric phenotype has remained controversial over time, mainly because of high post-operative complications, reduced survival and a variable, unpredictable rate of neurological improvement. This article critically discusses the recently published data in this field, focussing in more detail on isolated neuropsychiatric phenotype as a potential indication for liver transplantation in WD patients.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Cardenas ◽  
Isabel Graupera ◽  
Elsa Sola ◽  
Pere Ginès

Cirrhosis is the most advanced stage of all the different types of chronic liver diseases. It is defined as a diffuse disorganization of normal hepatic structure by extensive fibrosis associated with regenerative nodules. Hepatic fibrosis is potentially reversible if the causative agent is removed. However, advanced cirrhosis leads to major alterations in the hepatic vascular bed and is usually irreversible. Cirrhosis is a progressive and severe clinical condition associated with considerable morbidity and high mortality. It leads to a wide spectrum of characteristic clinical manifestations, mainly attributable to hepatic insufficiency and portal hypertension. Major complications of portal hypertension include ascites, gastrointestinal (GI) variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), renal failure, and bacterial infections. In recent years, major advances in the understanding of the natural history and pathophysiology of cirrhosis and the treatment of its complications have led to improved management, quality of life, and life expectancy of patients with this disease. Cirrhosis is also a risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Decompensated cirrhosis carries a poor short-term prognosis; thus, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) should always be considered in suitable candidates. This chapter describes the epidemiology, etiology and genetic factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, general management, and treatment of cirrhosis. Complications of cirrhosis are discussed, including ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, dilutional hyponatremia, hepatorenal syndrome, variceal bleeding, hepatopulmonary syndrome and postpulmonary hypertension, HE, and HCC. Indications and contraindications for liver transplantation are described. Figures show liver biopsy results and ultrasound images in cirrhosis from hepatitis C, a patient with tense ascites, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS), large esophageal varices with red spots, and HCC. Tables outline the main causes of cirrhosis and the diagnostic methods for identifying them, the Child-Pugh score, diagnostic criteria for hepatorenal syndrome, grades of HE, and indications for liver transplantation.This chapter contains 6 highly rendered figures, 8 tables, 73 references.


2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerio Giannelli ◽  
Olivier Roux ◽  
Cédric Laouénan ◽  
Pauline Manchon ◽  
Floriane Ausloos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 205064062095263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adelina Horhat ◽  
Christophe Bureau ◽  
Dominique Thabut ◽  
Marika Rudler

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is a percutaneous radiologic-guided procedure that aims to reduce portal hypertension by creating a shunt between the portal venous system and the hepatic venous system. The most common cause of portal hypertension is liver cirrhosis in Western countries. Two main indications of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt are validated by randomised controlled studies in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding (salvage transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, early-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or rebleeding despite an optimal secondary prophylaxis) or refractory ascites. Careful selection of the patients is crucial in order to prevent post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt complications, including liver failure, post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt encephalopathy occurrence and cardiac decompensation, for a better long-term outcome. In this review, we will discuss transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt indications in 2020 in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, with a special focus on variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. Then, we will describe transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt-related complications, the contraindications and the current knowledge on patient’s selection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document