ASCO-GI 2019: Gallengangskarzinome

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 67-67
Author(s):  
Alexander Kretzschmar

Gallengangskarzinome treten selten auf und weisen eine sehr schlechte Prognose auf. In einer auf dem Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium (GICS) vorgestellten offenen Phase-II-Studie führte die Kombination der BRAF- and MEK-Inhibitoren Dabrafenib und Trametinib zu einer objektiven Responserate (ORR) als primärem Endpunkt von 41 % (13/32; 95 % Konfidenzintervall [KI] 24–59 %), so Prof. Zev A. Wainberg, Los Angeles/USA.

1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merry Tetef ◽  
Kim Margolin ◽  
Chul Ahn ◽  
Steven Akman ◽  
Warren Chow ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-545
Author(s):  
Adel H. Hagekhalil ◽  
Reina Pereira ◽  
Kellene Burn-Roy ◽  
Jack Baylis ◽  
Heather Boyle

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Jordan ◽  
Olaf Kellner ◽  
Thomas Kegel ◽  
Hans-Joachim Schmoll ◽  
Axel Grothey

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 408-408
Author(s):  
Robert C. Gagnon ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Anne-Marie Martin ◽  
Jonathan E. Rosenberg ◽  
...  

408 Background: Microarray and clinical data from a randomized phase II RCC clinical trial were evaluated to examine the HIF1α kidney cancer gene signature developed from cell lines by Shen et al (Cancer Discovery 2011). Methods: Archival FFPE tumor samples were collected from patients (pts) enrolled in a Phase II RCC study of pazopanib (Hutson, JCO 2009). RNA was isolated and microarray analysis was performed at Response Genetics, Inc. (Los Angeles, CA) using the Affymetrix (Affy) U133 plus Array. Affy data were normalized using the MAS5 algorithm. Genes (n=69) identified from experiments in 10 cancer cell lines were mapped to genes on the U133 array. Patterns of expression (exp) among the mapped genes were assessed using multivariate analyses. Putative patterns were assessed for association with HIF1α gene exp levels, and both patterns and HIF1α levels were assessed for association with response rate (RR) (RECIST), and PFS, using nonparametric and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was applied to determine if mapped genes were enriched for HIF1α gene exp. Results: RNA was available for 46 of 225 patients; baseline characteristics were similar to the overall study. 41/46 patients had VHL heterozygous mutations; 5/46 patients were VHL wild type. HIF1a gene expression was detected in all 46 patients. 64/69 genes were mapped to the Affy platform. For genes which mapped to multiple probes, the probe closest to the 3` end was used. A potential 4 cluster pattern was identified. These clusters were associated with HIF1α gene exp, but neither clusters nor HIF1α gene exp were associated with clinical response to pazopanib. Conclusions: The observed pattern of gene exp among 46 pts with available data from a Phase II RCC study of pazopanib is consistent with the cell line derived gene set proposed by Shen et al. Patterns are associated with HIF1α exp; neither patterns nor HIF1α exp are associated with clinical response in this small subset of pts. These data support the on-going efforts in bench-to-bedside research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristoffer S. Rohrberg ◽  
René K. Olesen ◽  
Per Pfeiffer ◽  
Morten Ladekarl ◽  
Helle Pappot ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16542-e16542
Author(s):  
Hyeon-Su Im ◽  
Joon Seon Song ◽  
Woo Ri Jo ◽  
Moon-Won Yoo ◽  
Yong-Hee Kim ◽  
...  

e16542 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown survival benefits in unresectable/metastatic gastric cancer (GC), esophageal cancer (EC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Based on scientific rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy, including enhanced immune recognition, we initiated a phase II study of IMC-001, a novel PD-L1 targeting fully human monoclonal Ab in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable GC, EC, and HCC. Methods: This is a prospective, open-label, phase II study of neoadjuvant IMC-001 (20 mg/kg iv every 2 weeks for 2 cycles) across three cohorts of resectable gastrointestinal cancers (GC, EC, HCC). The primary endpoint is major pathologic response rate ( < 10% of viable tumor cells) and secondary endpoints include safety, feasibility, R0 resection rate, clinical tumor response rate/disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include immune monitoring and biomarker analysis in tumor tissues, blood, and stool. Results: From Sep. 2019 to Feb. 2020, 14 eligible patients (pts) (6 HCC; 5 GC; 3 EC) were enrolled; male (79%), median age = 63 yrs (range, 40-72), clinical stage (AJCC 8th) I (57%)/II (21%)/III (21%). 12 pts completed 2 cycles of neoadjuvant IMC-001 and one pt stopped after one cycle due to G3 autoimmune hepatitis, which was only G3 adverse event (AE) and resolved with steroid. Other AE included G2 hyperthyroidism (n = 1), G1 pruritus (n = 2), G1 rash (n = 1), G1 myalgia (n = 1), G1 arthralgia (n = 1), G1 diarrhea (n = 1), G1 cough (n = 1), G1 palate discomfort (n = 1), and G1 chest discomfort (n = 1). So far, 10 clinical response-evaluable pts showed a 100% DCR and underwent surgery, which was all R0 resection. Post-treatment surgery specimens showed various degrees of lymphocyte infiltration in intratumoral or peritumoral areas ranging from 10% to 90%, which was increased compared to pre-treatment biopsies. In HCC pts, adjacent hepatic parenchyma showed mild to moderate, diffuse portal inflammation regardless of Hepatitis B virus status and minimal and moderate fatty change. IHC for PD-L1 using 22C3, SP263 and SP142 clones showed similar results among three Abs with relatively low expression regardless of tumor types (range, 0-20%). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant IMC-001 seems to be well tolerated and have preliminary immune modulating activity in resectable GC, EC, and HCC pts. The study is ongoing and the updated clinical and immunologic results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04196465 .


Oncology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keizo Sugimachi ◽  
Yoshihiko Maehara ◽  
Noboru Horikoshi ◽  
Yosuhiro Shimada ◽  
Yuh Sakata ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document