scholarly journals Definition of competence standards for optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britt B. S. L. Houwen ◽  
Cesare Hassan ◽  
Veerle M. H. Coupé ◽  
Marjolein J. E. Greuter ◽  
Yark Hazewinkel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has developed a core curriculum for high quality optical diagnosis training for practice across Europe. The development of easy-to-measure competence standards for optical diagnosis can optimize clinical decision-making in endoscopy. This manuscript represents an official Position Statement of the ESGE aiming to define simple, safe, and easy-to-measure competence standards for endoscopists and artificial intelligence systems performing optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps (1 – 5 mm). Methods A panel of European experts in optical diagnosis participated in a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on Simple Optical Diagnosis Accuracy (SODA) competence standards for implementation of the optical diagnosis strategy for diminutive colorectal polyps. In order to assess the clinical benefits and harms of implementing optical diagnosis with different competence standards, a systematic literature search was performed. This was complemented with the results from a recently performed simulation study that provides guidance for setting alternative competence standards for optical diagnosis. Proposed competence standards were based on literature search and simulation study results. Competence standards were accepted if at least 80 % agreement was reached after a maximum of three voting rounds. Recommendation 1 In order to implement the leave-in-situ strategy for diminutive colorectal lesions (1–5 mm), it is clinically acceptable if, during real-time colonoscopy, at least 90 % sensitivity and 80 % specificity is achieved for high confidence endoscopic characterization of colorectal neoplasia of 1–5 mm in the rectosigmoid. Histopathology is used as the gold standard.Level of agreement 95 %. Recommendation 2 In order to implement the resect-and-discard strategy for diminutive colorectal lesions (1–5 mm), it is clinically acceptable if, during real-time colonoscopy, at least 80 % sensitivity and 80 % specificity is achieved for high confidence endoscopic characterization of colorectal neoplasia of 1–5 mm. Histopathology is used as the gold standard.Level of agreement 100 %. Conclusion The developed SODA competence standards define diagnostic performance thresholds in relation to clinical consequences, for training and for use when auditing the optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps.

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 899-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelien Dekker ◽  
Britt B. S. L. Houwen ◽  
Ignasi Puig ◽  
Marco Bustamante-Balén ◽  
Emmanuel Coron ◽  
...  

Main RecommendationsThis manuscript represents an official Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) aiming to guide general gastroenterologists to develop and maintain skills in optical diagnosis during endoscopy. In general, this requires additional training beyond the core curriculum currently provided in each country. In this context, ESGE have developed a European core curriculum for optical diagnosis practice across Europe for high quality optical diagnosis training. 1 ESGE suggests that every endoscopist should have achieved general competence in upper and/or lower gastrointestinal (UGI/LGI) endoscopy before commencing training in optical diagnosis of the UGI/LGI tract, meaning personal experience of at least 300 UGI and/or 300 LGI endoscopies and meeting the ESGE quality measures for UGI/LGI endoscopy. ESGE suggests that every endoscopist should be able and competent to perform UGI/LGI endoscopy with high definition white light combined with virtual and/or dye-based chromoendoscopy before commencing training in optical diagnosis. 2 ESGE suggests competency in optical diagnosis can be learned by attending a validated optical diagnosis training course based on a validated classification, and self-learning with a minimum number of lesions. If no validated training course is available, optical diagnosis can only be learned by attending a non-validated onsite training course and self-learning with a minimum number of lesions. 3 ESGE suggests endoscopists are competent in optical diagnosis after meeting the pre-adoption and learning criteria, and meeting competence thresholds by assessing a minimum number of lesions prospectively during real-time endoscopy. ESGE suggests ongoing in vivo practice by endoscopists to maintain competence in optical diagnosis. If a competent endoscopist does not perform in vivo optical diagnosis on a regular basis, ESGE suggests repeating the learning and competence phases to maintain competence.Key areas of interest were optical diagnosis training in Barrett’s esophagus, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, diminutive colorectal lesions, early colorectal cancer, and neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Condition-specific recommendations are provided in the main document.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ahmad ◽  
A Wilson ◽  
M Moorghen ◽  
A Dhillon ◽  
S Thomas-Gibson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Daca Alvarez ◽  
Liseth Rivero-Sanchez ◽  
Maria Pellisé

AbstractColonoscopy is the gold standard for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. The main quality indicator of colonoscopy is the adenoma detection rate, which is inversely associated with the risk of interval CRC and the risk of death from this neoplasia. In the setting of CRC prevention, diagnostic colonoscopy has undergone a remarkable evolution in the past 20 years. Hand in hand with the implementation of CRC prevention programs and technological advances, we are now able to identify tiny and subtle neoplastic lesions and predict their histology with great efficiency. In this article, we briefly review the endoscopy technologies that can be used to improve the detection and characterization of colorectal polyps.


2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. E140-E145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mineo Iwatate ◽  
Yasushi Sano ◽  
Santa Hattori ◽  
Wataru Sano ◽  
Noriaki Hasuike ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB89
Author(s):  
Ahmir Ahmad ◽  
Ana Wilson ◽  
Morgan Moorghen ◽  
Angad S. Dhillon ◽  
Siwan Thomas-Gibson ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (9) ◽  
pp. 1633-1641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pujan Kandel ◽  
Eelco Christiaan Brand ◽  
Joe Pelt ◽  
Colleen T Ball ◽  
Wei-Chung Chen ◽  
...  

ObjectiveIt is unclear whether endoscopic assessment of scars after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has to include biopsies, even if endoscopy is negative. Vice versa, endoscopic diagnosis of recurrent adenoma may not require biopsy before endoscopic reinterventions. We prospectively analysed various endoscopic modalities in the diagnosis of recurrence following EMR.DesignWe conducted a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy after EMR of large (≥20 mm) colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopists predicted recurrence and confidence level with four imaging modes: high-definition white light (WL) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) with and without near focus (NF). Separately, 26 experienced endoscopists assessed offline images.ResultsTwo hundred and thirty patients with 255 EMR scars were included. The prevalence of recurrent adenoma was 24%. Diagnostic values were high for all modes (negative predictive value (NPV) ≥97%, positive predictive value (PPV) ≥81%, sensitivity ≥90%, specificity ≥93% and accuracy ≥93%). In high-confidence cases, NBI with NF had NPV of 100% (95% CI 98% to 100%) and sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). Use of clips at initial EMR increased diagnostic inaccuracy (adjusted OR=1.68(95% CI 1.01 to 2.75)). In offline assessment, specificity was high for all imaging modes (mean: ≥93% (range: 55%–100%)), while sensitivity was significantly higher for NBI-NF (82%(72%–93%)%)) compared with WL (69%(38%–86%); p<0.001), WL-NF (68%(55%–83%); p<0.001) and NBI (71%(59%–90%); p<0.001).ConclusionOur study demonstrates very high sensitivity and accuracy for all four imaging modalities, especially NBI with NF, for diagnosis of recurrent neoplasia after EMR. Our data strongly suggest that in cases of high confidence negative optical diagnosis based on NBI-NF, no biopsy is needed to confirm absence of recurrence during colorectal EMR follow-up. A high confidence positive optical diagnosis can lead to immediate resection of any suspicious area. In all cases of low confidence, biopsy is still required.Trial registration numberNCT02668198.


Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (03) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanna Ponugoti ◽  
Amit Rastogi ◽  
Tonya Kaltenbach ◽  
Margaret MacPhail ◽  
Andrew Sullivan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Diminutive colorectal polyps resected during colonoscopy are sometimes histologically interpreted as normal tissue. The aim of this observational study was to explore whether errors in specimen handling or processing account in part for polyps ≤ 3 mm in size being interpreted as normal tissue by pathology when they were considered high confidence adenomas by an experienced endoscopist at colonoscopy. Methods One endoscopist photographed 900 consecutive colorectal lesions that were ≤ 3 mm in size and considered endoscopically to be high confidence conventional adenomas. The photographs were reviewed blindly to eliminate poor quality images. The remaining 644 endoscopy images were reviewed by two external experts who predicted the histology while blinded to the pathology results. Results Of 644 consecutive lesions ≤ 3 mm in size considered high confidence conventional adenomas by a single experienced colonoscopist, 15.4 % were reported as normal mucosa by pathology. The prevalence of reports of normal mucosa in polyps removed by cold snare and cold forceps were 15.2 % and 16.0 %, respectively. When endoscopy photographs were reviewed by two blinded outside experts, the lesions found pathologically to be adenomas and normal mucosa were interpreted as high confidence adenomas by endoscopic appearance in 96.9 % and 93.9 %, respectively, by Expert 1 (P = 0.15), and in 99.6 % and 100 %, respectively, by Expert 2 (P = 0.51). Conclusion Retrieval and/or processing of tissue specimens of tiny colorectal polyps resulted in some lesions being diagnosed as normal tissue by pathology despite being considered endoscopically to be high confidence adenomas. These findings suggest that pathology interpretation is not a gold standard for lesion management when this phenomenon is observed.


Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen Weigt ◽  
Alessandro Repici ◽  
Giulio Antonelli ◽  
Ahmed Afifi ◽  
Leon Kliegis ◽  
...  

Background Artificial Intelligence (AI) may reduce miss rate of colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy by improving lesion recognition (CADe), and cost of pathology by improving optical diagnosis (CADx). Methods To train a combined CADe and CADx (CAD-EYE,Fujifilm,Japan) based on deep learning, a multicenter library of >200,000 images from 1,572 polyps was used, while testing was performed on two independent image sets (CADe: 446 with polyps and 234 without; CADx: 267) from 234 polyps that was also evaluated by 6 endoscopists (3 experts, 3 non-experts). Results CADe showed a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 92.9%, 90.6% and 91.7%, respectively. Experts showed slightly higher accuracy and specificity and a similar sensitivity, while non-experts+CADe showed comparable sensitivity, but lower specificity and accuracy. CADx system showed a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 85%, 79.4% and 83.6% for polyp characterization, respectively. Experts comparable performances, while non-experts using CADx showed comparable accuracy, but lower specificity. Conclusions The high accuracy shown by CADe and CADx systems is similar to expert endoscopists, prompting its implementation in clinical practice. When using CAD, non-expert endoscopists achieve similar performances to those of expert endoscopists, with suboptimal specificity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document