14 Tissue Engineering for the Rotator Cuff–Deficient Shoulder

RSC Advances ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (46) ◽  
pp. 27013-27020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Tang ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Qinghua Wei ◽  
Xu Tang ◽  
Wanqiang Zhuang

Over the last few decades, extraordinary progress has been accomplished in the field of bone tissue engineering.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin B. Rothrauff ◽  
Thierry Pauyo ◽  
Richard E. Debski ◽  
Mark W. Rodosky ◽  
Rocky S. Tuan ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1193-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadanao Funakoshi ◽  
Tokifumi Majima ◽  
Norimasa Iwasaki ◽  
Naoki Suenaga ◽  
Naohiro Sawaguchi ◽  
...  

Background The current surgical procedures for irreparable rotator cuff tears have considerable limitations. Tissue engineering techniques using novel scaffold materials offer potential alternatives for managing these conditions. Hypothesis A chitosan-based hyaluronan hybrid scaffold could enhance type I collagen products with seeded fibroblasts and thereby increase the mechanical strength of regenerated tendon in vivo. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods The scaffolds were created from chitosan-based hyaluronan hybrid polymer fibers. Forty-eight rabbit infraspinatus tendons and their humeral insertions were removed to create defects. Each defect was covered with a fibroblast-seeded scaffold (n = 16) or a non-fibroblast-seeded scaffold (n = 16). In the other 16 shoulders, the rotator cuff defect was left free as the control. At 4 and 12 weeks after surgery, the engineered tendons were assessed by histological, immunohistochemical (n = 2), and biomechanical (n = 6) analyses. Results Type I collagen was only seen in the fibroblast-seeded scaffold and increased in the regenerated tissue. The tensile strength and tangent modulus in the fibroblast-seeded scaffold were significantly improved from 4 to 12 weeks postoperatively. The fibroblast-seeded scaffold had a significantly greater tangent modulus than did the non-fibroblast-seeded scaffold and the control at 12 weeks. Conclusion This scaffold material enhanced the production of type I collagen and led to improved mechanical strength in the regenerated tissues of the rotator cuff in vivo. Clinical Relevance Rotator cuff regeneration is feasible using this tissue engineering technique.


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. S204-S207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua S. Dines ◽  
Daniel A. Grande ◽  
David M. Dines

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Maffulli ◽  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Mattia Loppini ◽  
Alessandra Berton ◽  
Filippo Spiezia ◽  
...  

The purpose of this systematic review was to address the treatment of rotator cuff tears by applying tissue engineering approaches to improve tendon healing, specifically platelet rich plasma (PRP) augmentation, stem cells, and scaffolds. Our systematic search was performed using the combination of the following terms: “rotator cuff”, “shoulder”, “PRP”, “platelet rich plasma”, “stemcells”, “scaffold”, “growth factors”, and “tissue engineering”. No level I or II studies were found on the use of scaffolds and stem cells for rotator cuff repair. Three studies compared rotator cuff repair with or without PRP augmentation. All authors performed arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with different techniques of suture anchor fixation and different PRP augmentation. The three studies found no difference in clinical rating scales and functional outcomes between PRP and control groups. Only one study showed clinical statistically significant difference between the two groups at the 3-month followup. Any statistically significant difference in the rates of tendon rerupture between the control group and the PRP group was found using the magnetic resonance imaging. The current literature on tissue engineering application for rotator cuff repair is scanty. Comparative studies included in this review suggest that PRP augmented repair of a rotator cuff does not yield improved functional and clinical outcome compared with non-augmented repair at a medium and long-term followup.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (17-18) ◽  
pp. 958-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Jenkins ◽  
Sean Meehan ◽  
Behnam Pourdeyhimi ◽  
Dianne Little

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document