Whole Blood Platelet Aggregometry and Platelet Function Testing

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (02) ◽  
pp. 168-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
David McGlasson ◽  
George Fritsma
Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2255-2255
Author(s):  
Niklas Boknäs ◽  
Sofia Ramström ◽  
Lars Faxälv ◽  
Tomas L Lindahl

Abstract Platelet function disorders (PFDs) are common in patients with mild bleeding disorders (MBDs), yet the clinical significance of laboratory findings suggestive of a PFD remain unclear due to the lack of evidence for a clear link between test results and patient phenotype. Herein, we present results from a study evaluating the potential utility of platelet function testing using whole-blood flow cytometry in a cohort of 105 patients undergoing investigation for MBD. Subjects were evaluated with a test panel comprising two different activation markers (fibrinogen binding and p-selectin exposure) and four physiologically relevant platelet agonists (ADP, PAR1-AP, PAR4-AP and CRP-XL). Abnormal test results were identified by comparison with reference ranges constructed from 24 healthy controls or the fifth percentile of the entire patient sample. We found that abnormal test results are predictive of bleeding symptom severity, and that the greatest predictive strength was achieved using a subset of the panel, comparing measurements of fibrinogen binding after activation with all four agonists with the fifth percentile of the patient sample (P = 0.00008, hazard ratio 8.7; 95 % CI 2.5-40). Our results suggest that whole-blood flow cytometry-based platelet function testing is a feasible alternative for the investigation of MBDs. We also show that platelet function testing using whole-blood flow cytometry could provide a clinically relevant quantitative assessment of platelet-related primary hemostasis. Figure 1. Test results for each patient in comparison with reference range (A) and the fifth percentile of the entire patient cohort (B). Normal test results are colored grey, abnormal test results are colored with a continuous color gradient using the deviation from the mean divided by the standard deviation as a measure of degree of abnormality. Grey horizontal bars illustrate the number of abnormal test results for each patient. Figure 1. Test results for each patient in comparison with reference range (A) and the fifth percentile of the entire patient cohort (B). Normal test results are colored grey, abnormal test results are colored with a continuous color gradient using the deviation from the mean divided by the standard deviation as a measure of degree of abnormality. Grey horizontal bars illustrate the number of abnormal test results for each patient. Disclosures Lindahl: Diapensia: Equity Ownership.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Jae Jeon ◽  
Muhammad Mohsin Qureshi ◽  
Seung Yeob Lee ◽  
Jaya Dilip Badadhe ◽  
Heejoo Cho ◽  
...  

Abstract Platelet aggregation and adhesion are critically involved in both normal hemostasis and thrombosis during vascular injury. Before any surgery, it is important to identify the number of platelets and their functionality to reduce the risk of bleeding; therefore, platelet function testing is a requirement. We introduce a novel evaluation method of assessing platelet function with laser speckle contrast imaging. The speckle decorrelation time (SDT) of the blood flowing through a microfluidic channel chip provides a quantitative measure of platelet aggregation. We compared SDTs of whole blood and platelet-poor blood, i.e., whole blood stripped of its buffy coat region, and found a marked reduction in decorrelation time for platelet-poor blood. The measured SDT of platelet-poor blood was 1.04 ± 0.21 ms, while that of whole blood was 2.64 ± 0.83 ms. To further characterize the sensitivity of our speckle decorrelation time-based platelet function testing (SDT-PFT), we added various agonists involved in platelet aggregation, including adenosine diphosphate (ADP), epinephrine (EPI), and arachidonic acid (AA). In this study, the results show that whole blood with ADP resulted in the largest SDT, followed by whole blood with AA, whole blood with EPI, whole blood without agonist, and platelet-poor blood with or without agonist. These findings show that SDT-PFT has the potential for rapid screening of bleeding disorders and monitoring of anti-platelet therapies with only a small volume of blood.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3508-3508
Author(s):  
Neha Rastogi-Chawla ◽  
William Fricke ◽  
Ruth W Kouides ◽  
Peter A. Kouides

Abstract Abstract 3508 Poster Board III-445 Introduction Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are antagonists of the serotonin transporter and lead to a lower concentration of serotonin in platelets. Recently there have been a number of observational studies and case reports highlighting the association of SSRI use with various hemorrhagic complications ranging from gastrointestinal hemorrhage to hemorrhagic stroke and bleeding during orthopedic surgery. On the other hand, there is not enough data on the clinical correlation between the effect of SSRIs on platelet function testing and relation to bleeding symptoms in terms of the bleeding score. Patients and Methods A retrospective, cohort study was done to assess the relationship of bleeding symptoms and laboratory assays of platelet function in patients referred for muco-cutaneous bleeding after von Willebrand disease was ruled out. The cohort was analyzed for the effect of SSRI use on platelet function and bleeding symptoms. Ninety eight patients were studied and their bleeding symptoms were assessed by the European Union Von Willebrand disease bleeding scoring system (EUVWD). Hemostatic tests including whole blood platelet aggregation (Chrono-Log™) and closure time (PFA-100™, Dade/Behring) were assessed. Results 23/98 patients reported SSRI as an active medication. Baseline characteristics were similar with respect to age, sex, race, hematocrit and platelet count among SSRI users and non-users. The majority (96%) were females. The median bleeding score was not statistically different in SSRI users vs. non-users (4 vs. 5). The bleeding symptoms were similar in the two groups with the exception of epistaxis which was more frequent in SSRI non-users. Whole blood platelet aggregation was decreased in 17.4% patients in SSRI users and 4.2% in non-users (p=0.035). Likewise, 52% patients in SSRI users and 29% in non-user had decreased release to any agonist (p=0.04). SSRI users had a higher prevalance of decreased aggregation with low dose collagen, arachidionic acid and ADP. ATP release in response to arachidionic acid and ADP was also lower in SSRI users. PFA-100 closure time with collagen-epinephrine (n=96) was prolonged in SSRI users vs. non users (144.5 vs. 126 sec, p=0.009) while closure time with collagen-ADP (n=22) was 105.5 vs. 108.5 in SSRI users vs. non users (p= 0.94). Conclusions SSRI use is associated with abnormalities in platelet function and this finding probably does warrant testing such patients with a suspected thrombocytopathy off SSRI. Their use, nonetheless, is not associated with a clinically significant difference in bleeding symptoms as assessed by the bleeding score. SSRI users with bleeding symptoms and associated abnormalities in platelet function should be investigated further for the cause of clinically significant bleeding. Bleeding score was assessed using EU-VWD scoring system. The aggregation and release studies were done with whole blood using Chronolog device in 98 patients. Results are represented as percentage abnormal. Closure times were done by PFA-100 (Dade-Behring) and results are expressed in seconds. † CEPI-collagen and epinephrine, CADP-collagen and ADP. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (02) ◽  
pp. 239-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Favaloro ◽  
Roslyn Bonar

Platelet function testing is an essential component of comprehensive hemostasis evaluation within the framework of bleeding and/or bruising investigations, and it may also be performed to evaluate antiplatelet medication effects. Globally, the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 (Siemens Healthcare, Marburg, Germany) is the most used primary hemostasis-screening instrument and has also been recently remodeled/upgraded to the PFA-200. The PFA-100 is sensitive to a wide range of associated disorders, including platelet function defects and von Willebrand disease (VWD), as well as to various antiplatelet medications. The PFA-100 is also useful in therapy monitoring, especially in VWD. External quality assessment (EQA) (or proficiency testing) and internal quality control (IQC) are critical to ensuring quality of test practice, inclusive of all hemostasis tests. However, both EQA and IQC for platelet function testing, including the PFA-100, is logistically challenging, given theoretical requirements for production, storage, and shipment of large volumes of “stabilized” normal and pathological blood/platelets covering both normal function plus a wide variety of potential defects. We accordingly describe the development and testing of novel feasible approaches to both EQA and IQC of PFA-100/PFA-200 instruments, whereby a range of formulated “platelet function antagonist” materials are utilized. For EQA purposes, these are distributed to participants, and citrated normal whole blood collected on site is then added locally, thereby creating test material that can be locally evaluated. Several exercises have been conducted by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program (RCPAQAP) over the past 6 years. A total of 26 challenges, with most designed to mimic moderate to severe primary hemostasis defects, have been tested in 26 to 50 laboratories depending on the year of dispatch. Numerical results for PFA-100/PFA-200 closure times (CTs) and interpretive comments supplied by participants are analyzed by the RCPAQAP. During this period, reported CTs for each challenge were within limits of expectation and good reproducibility was evidenced by repeated challenges. Coefficients of variation (CVs) generated for challenges using the two major PFA-100/PFA-200 cartridge types (collagen/adenosine diphosphate and collagen/epinephrine) are always similar to those obtained using native whole blood, and in general range from 15 to 25%. Interpretations are also in general consistent with expectations and test data provided by laboratories. The EQA created material has also been assessed within the context of possible IQC material. In conclusion, EQA and IQC processes for the PFA-100/PFA-200 have been developed that include highly reproducible test challenge processes, not only supporting the concept that EQA/IQC is possible for platelet function testing but also providing a valuable mechanism for monitoring and improving laboratory performance in this area.


Platelets ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Friedrich Christoph Kaiser ◽  
Horst Neubauer ◽  
Cora Christina Franken ◽  
Jan-Christoph Krüger ◽  
Andreas Mügge ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (12) ◽  
pp. 781-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Calatzis ◽  
Sandra Penz ◽  
Hajna Losonczy ◽  
Wolfgang Siess ◽  
Orsolya Tóth

SummarySeveral methods are used to analyse platelet function in whole blood. A new device to measure whole blood platelet aggregation has been developed, called multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA). Our aim was to evaluate MEA in comparison with the single platelet counting (SPC) method for the measurement of platelet aggregation and platelet inhibition by aspirin or apyrase in diluted whole blood. Platelet aggregation induced by different concentrations of ADP, collagen and TRAP-6 and platelet inhibition by apyrase or aspirin were determined in citrateor hirudin-anticoagulated blood by MEA and SPC. MEA indicated that spontaneous platelet aggregation was lower, and stimulated platelet aggregation was higher in hirudin- than citrate-anticoagulated blood. In hirudin-anticoagulated, but not citrate-anticoagulated blood, spontaneous platelet aggregation measured by MEA was inhibited by apyrase. For MEA compared with SPC the dose response-curves of agonist-induced platelet aggregation in citrate- and hirudin-blood showed similar EC50 values for TRAP, and higher EC50 values for ADP (non-significant) and collagen (p<0.05). MEA and the SPC method gave similar results concerning platelet-inhibition by apyrase and aspirin. MEA was more sensitive than SPC to the inhibitory effect of aspirin in collagen-induced aggregation. In conclusion, MEA is an easy, reproducible and sensitive method for measuring spontaneous and stimulated platelet aggregation, and evaluating antiplatelet drugs in diluted whole blood. The use of hirudin as an anticoagulant is preferable to the use of citrate. MEA is a promising technique for experimental and clinical applications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document