Anatomic Imaging of Abdominal Perforator Flaps without Ionizing Radiation: Seeing Is Believing with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Angiography

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (01) ◽  
pp. 037-044 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Greenspun ◽  
Julie Vasile ◽  
Joshua Levine ◽  
Heather Erhard ◽  
Rebecca Studinger ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-112
Author(s):  
Sun-June Park ◽  
Kyeong-Tae Lee ◽  
Byung-Joon Jeon ◽  
Kyong-Je Woo

Pedicled perforator flaps (PPFs) have been widely used to treat pressure sores in the gluteal region. Selection of a reliable perforator is crucial for successful surgical treatment of pressure sores using PPFs. In this study, we evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in planning PPF reconstruction of pressure sores in the gluteal region. A retrospective chart review was performed in patients who had undergone these PPF reconstructions and who had received preoperative MRI. Preoperatively, the extent of infection and necrotic tissue was evaluated using MRI, and a reliable perforator was identified, considering the perforator location in relation to the defect, perforator size, and perforator courses. Intraoperatively, the targeted perforator was marked on the skin at the locations measured on the MRI images, and the marked location was confirmed using intraoperative handheld Doppler. Superior gluteal artery, inferior gluteal artery, or parasacral perforators were used for the PPFs. Surgical outcomes were evaluated. A total of 12 PPFs were performed in 12 patients. Superior gluteal artery perforator flaps were performed in 7 patients, inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps were performed in 3 patients, and parasacral perforator flaps were performed in 2 patients. We could identify a reliable perforator on MRI, and it was found at the predicted locations in all cases. There was only one case of partial flap necrosis. There was no recurrence of the pressure sores during the mean follow-up period of 6.7 months (range = 3-15 months). In selected patients with gluteal pressure sores, MRI is a suitable means for not only providing information about disease extent and comorbidities but also for evaluating perforators for PPF reconstructions.


1986 ◽  
Vol 95 (3_part_1) ◽  
pp. 303-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney P. Lusk ◽  
Phillip C. Lee

Congenital midline nasal masses are rare lesions with potential intracranial extensions. Thus, thoughtful preoperative evaluation Is essential in planning the appropriate surgical approach, to prevent such complications as cerebral spinal fluid leaks and meningitis. Preoperative computerized tomographic (CT) scans are useful in visualizing bony defects, but are not well suited for soft tissue imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Is the latest advance in cross-sectional imaging technology. It offers superior soft tissue contrast, is noninvasive, and does not use ionizing radiation. It is particularly useful in imaging encephaloceles. Three cases of congenital midline masses are presented as illustrations. Two dermoid cysts demonstrate the usefulness of MRI in ruling out intracranial extension. A large encephalocele dramatically demonstrates the superiority of MRI in imaging the brain herniating into the nose. Since MRI is noninvasive and does not use ionizing radiation, it should be considered before CT scanning, to rule out intracranial extension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document