Cardiogenic progenitor cells derived from skeletal muscle - A promising autologous cell source for cardiac cell therapy

2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
YH Choi ◽  
K Neef ◽  
P Treskes ◽  
S Kumar ◽  
OJ Liakopoulos ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
pp. 216-224.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Serena Wong ◽  
Jessica Laflèche ◽  
Suzanne Crowe ◽  
Thierry G. Mesana ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (01) ◽  
pp. 042-052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Nazari-Shafti ◽  
Jörg Kempfert ◽  
Volkmar Falk ◽  
Wilhelm Röll ◽  
Christof Stamm

AbstractPreclinical data suggested that somatic stem or progenitor cells derived induce and/or support endogenous repair mechanisms of the myocardium. Such cell populations were clearly shown to promote neovascularization in postischemic tissue, and some evidence also indicated transdifferentiation into cardiomyocytes. In the clinical setting, however, many attempts to regenerate damaged myocardium with a variety of autologous and allogeneic somatic progenitors have failed to generate the expected therapeutic efficacy. Currently, efforts are being made to select specific cellular subpopulations, modify somatic cells to augment their regenerative capacity, improve delivery methods, and develop markers selection of potentially responding patients. Cardiac surgical groups have pioneered and continue to advance the field of cellular therapies. While the initial excitement has subsided, the field has evolved into one of the pillars of surgical research and benefits from novel methods such as cellular reprogramming, genetic modification, and pluripotent stem cell technology. This review highlights developments and controversies in somatic cardiac cell therapy and provides a comprehensive overview of completed and ongoing clinical trials.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Aonuma ◽  
Naofumi Takehara ◽  
Keisuke Maruyama ◽  
Maki Kabara ◽  
Motoki Matsuki ◽  
...  

Introduction: Overcoming the poor survival of cell grafts is an indispensable mission in cell therapy. Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease/redox factor-1 (APE1) is known as a multifunctional enzyme to encourage cell survival, whereas the role of APE1 in cardiac cell therapy is still unknown. Hypothesis: APE1 overexpression in cardiac progenitor cells (CPC) ameliorates the effect of cardiac cell therapy. Methods: CPCs from 8-10 week-old C57BL/6 mice hearts were transfected with APE1-DsRed gene (APE1-CPC) or DsRed gene (Control [Ct]-CPC). The apoptosis induced by oxidative stress was assessed in APE1-/Ct-CPCs, and in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCM) within the co-culture system of APE1-/Ct-CPCs. Western blot analysis indicated the cellular signal to protect CPC via APE1 enzyme. To evaluate the effect of APE1 overexpression in cell therapy, we transplanted APE1-CPCs and Ct-CPCs into the mice myocardial infarction (MI) model and assessed the pathophysiological role of APE1 with functional and histological analysis. Results: Under the oxidative stress condition, APE1 overexpression inhibited the apoptosis of CPCs and accelerated TAK1 activation (Ct-CPC : APE1-CPC = 1.5±0.4 : 3.3±1.6 fold, p<0.05), and consequently NfKB phosphorylation in CPCs. In the co-culture system, the apoptosis of NRCMs was inhibited with APE1-CPCs compared to that with Ct-CPCs. In vivo, in the mice MI model, the number of total CPC grafts and cardiac α-actinin-positive graft CPCs were significantly larger in APE1-CPC injected mice (APE1 mice) compared to Ct-CPC injected mice (Ct mice) at 7 days after implantation. Eventually, the left ventricular ejection fraction of APE1 mice was significantly improved compared to Ct mice (Ct mice : APE1 mice = +3.1±6.7 : +11.3±4.0%, p<0.05) and was accompanied with the attenuation of fibrosis at 28 days after implantation. Conclusions: APE1 gene inhibited the apoptosis of CPCs and host cells against oxidative stress via the activation of TAK1-NFkB pathway, which is a novel insight into the stress response of APE1 enzyme. Furthermore, APE1-CPC grafts that effectively survived in the ischemic heart restored cardiac dysfunction and attenuated myocardial infarct size, and may be an innovative strategy to reinforce cardiac cell therapy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Nasseri ◽  
M Kukucka ◽  
SJ Kim ◽  
YH Choi ◽  
KS Kang ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Roy ◽  
M Kukucka ◽  
D Messroghli ◽  
A Brodarac ◽  
M Becher ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 116 (8) ◽  
pp. 1291-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Assmus ◽  
Stefanie Dimmeler ◽  
Andreas M. Zeiher

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duc Thang Vu ◽  
Theo Kofidis

Myocardial infarction is the leading cause of death in developed countries. Cardiac cell therapy has been introduced to clinical trials for more than ten years but its results are still controversial. Tissue engineering has addressed some limitations of cell therapy and appears to be a promising solution for cardiac regeneration. In this review, we would like to summarize the current understanding about the therapeutic effect of cell therapy and tissue engineering under purview of functional and structural aspects, highlighting actual roles of each therapy towards clinical application.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document