Pantomime versus actual tool use: alterations of movement kinematics with the mode of execution and with brain damage

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Johannsen ◽  
Y Li ◽  
J Randerath ◽  
G Goldenberg ◽  
J Hermsdörfer
2012 ◽  
Vol 218 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Hermsdörfer ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Jennifer Randerath ◽  
Georg Goldenberg ◽  
Leif Johannsen

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 167-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Salazar-López ◽  
B.J. Schwaiger ◽  
J. Hermsdörfer

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 154-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Jarry ◽  
François Osiurak ◽  
Jérémy Besnard ◽  
Josselin Baumard ◽  
Mathieu Lesourd ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Hermsdorfer ◽  
J. Randerath ◽  
G. Goldenberg ◽  
W. Stadler ◽  
A. Dieler
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josselin Baumard ◽  
François Osiurak ◽  
Mathieu Lesourd ◽  
Didier Le Gall

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Martel ◽  
Livio Finos ◽  
Eric Koun ◽  
Alessandro Farnè ◽  
Alice Catherine Roy

AbstractHumans evolution is distinctly characterized by their exquisite mastery of tools, allowing them to shape their environment in more elaborate ways compared to other species. This ability is present ever since infancy and most theories indicate that children become proficient with tool use very early. In adults, tool use has been shown to plastically modify metric aspects of the arm representation, as indexed by changes in movement kinematics. To date, whether and when the plastic capability of updating the body representation develops during childhood remains unknown. This question is particularly important since body representation plasticity could be impacted by the fact that the human body takes years to achieve a stable metric configuration. Here we assessed the kinematics of 90 young participants (8–21 years old) required to reach for an object before and after tool use, as a function of their pubertal development. Results revealed that tool incorporation, as indexed by the adult typical kinematic pattern, develops very slowly and displays a u-shaped developmental trajectory. From early to mid puberty, the changes in kinematics following tool use seem to reflect a shortened arm representation, opposite to what was previously reported in adults. This pattern starts reversing after mid puberty, which is characterized by the lack of any kinematics change following tool use. The typical adult-like pattern emerges only at late puberty, when body size is stable. These findings reveal the complex dynamics of tool incorporation across development, possibly indexing the transition from a vision-based to a proprioception-based body representation plasticity.


Motor Control ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena V. Biryukova ◽  
Blandine Bril ◽  
Alexander A. Frolov ◽  
Mikhail A. Koulikov

What are the differences between the movements of an expert exhibiting superior performance compared with those of a novice or even an experienced person? Adopting a functional approach to tool use, this study presents results from experimental field research on stone knapping from Indian craftsmen of different levels of skill. The results showed that the differences in the levels of motor skill appeared in movement variability rather than in particular kinematic content. The higher is the level of motor skill, the more kinematic solutions are used, the more stable are the functional and the more variable the nonfunctional joint loadings. This study strongly suggests that to really understand learning processes and motor expertise, naturalistic challenging activities that require years of practice need to be elicited.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document