Perioperative Management of Patients Having Noncardiac Surgery Who Are Receiving Anticoagulant or Antiplatelet Therapy: An Evidence-Based but Practical Approach

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (07) ◽  
pp. 652-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Darvish-Kazem ◽  
James Douketis
CHEST Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (6) ◽  
pp. 1848-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Darvish-Kazem ◽  
Mandark Gandhi ◽  
Maura Marcucci ◽  
James D. Douketis

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-462
Author(s):  
Daniela C. Filipescu ◽  
Mihai G. Stefan ◽  
Liana Valeanu ◽  
Wanda M. Popescu

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (38) ◽  
pp. 4518-4524 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Kouvelos ◽  
Miltiadis Matsagkas ◽  
Nikolaos Rousas ◽  
Petroula Nana ◽  
Konstantinos Mpatzalexis ◽  
...  

Background: Approximately 10–15% of patients on DOACs have to interrupt their anticoagulant before an invasive procedure every year. The perioperative management and monitoring of DOACs have proved to be challenging, as differences in patients’ status and in the invasiveness of each procedure develop different situations that need a tailored therapeutic approach to each patient’s needs. Methods: This review aims to summarize current evidence on the perioperative management of DOACs in patients undergoing a vascular surgical procedure focusing with a practical approach on three key clinical questions: (i) can we stop DOAC therapy before the vascular procedure? (ii) is bridging therapy necessary? and (iii) which is the best perioperative strategy for interruption and resumption of the anticoagulant therapy? Results: No specific data exist for the perioperative management of vascular surgery patients on DOACs, as most studies include low number of such patients. Therapeutic strategy on how to handle DOACs perioperatively must be based on their half-life, the bleeding risk of the invasive procedures, and on the thromboembolic risk of the patient. Renal function plays a crucial role in such situations, increasing thromboembolic and bleeding risk. In general, DOACs should be stopped 2 days for high bleed risk, 1 day for low risk and should be resumed 48-72 hrs after high risk, 24 hrs after low-risk procedure. Bridging is almost never needed. Conclusion: Further perioperative research studies on patients undergoing vascular surgery are needed to confirm whether currently accepted therapeutic perioperative strategy is appropriate for these patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e238614
Author(s):  
Ogonna N Nnamani Silva ◽  
Audrey B Nguyen ◽  
William Y Hoffman

For patients whose vasculitis is managed with biologic medications, no reports or evidence-based guidance exists regarding the perioperative management of microvascular flaps. We present a case of a 78-year-old patient with Takayasu’s arteritis (TA) and diabetes mellitus who was taking infliximab and underwent wide local excision of squamous cell carcinoma, craniectomy and reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap. TA, an immune-mediated large cell vasculitis characterised by granuloma formation, tends to affect larger vessels and aortic branches. The typical localisation of this condition raises concerns about potentially compromised pedicle and recipient vessels (ie, superficial temporal arteries), which could hinder postoperative flap success. Discontinuation of infliximab 4 weeks before surgery and resumption 6 weeks after led to favourable results. This case addresses the gap in the literature concerning stopping and restarting biologic drugs in the perioperative setting and documents a successful course of a microvascular procedure in a patient with vasculitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document