Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in the treatment of Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: effects on platelet function assessed by platelet function tests and mean platelet volume

Background Knowledge on the pharmacodynamic effects of antiplatelet drugs including clopidogrel and ticagrelor on Asian patients is scarce. We aim to evaluate the effects of the two drugs on platelet reactivity in the treatment of Chinese patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), using two platelet function tests (PFT). Meanwhile, the relationship between mean platelet volume (MPV), a routine index of platelet size, and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is also investigated. Methods Patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were scheduled for the assessment of platelet reactivity at 2–3 days after PCI. Two PFTs, light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)-FCM assay, were applied in the evaluation of platelet reactivity. The MPV was measured simultaneously with EDTA plasma using a Sysmex XN 2000 automated hematology analyzer. Results The final study population included the aspirin + clopidogrel group (n = 46) and the aspirin + ticagrelor group (n = 66). In the aspirin + ticagrelor group, the maximal light transmittance (LT) changes in response to 5 μM ADP assessed by LTA was obviously lower than that in the aspirin + clopidogrel group (P < 0.001). The platelet reactivity index (PRI) level in the VASP test was also markedly lower in the group given aspirin and ticagrelor (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in HPR between the two groups. MPV showed a potent ability to predict the presence of HPR at VASP assay (AUC = 0.788, 95% CI: 0.701–0.875, P < 0.001) in receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Conclusions Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor has dramatically greater antiplatelet effect, with a superiority in suppressing platelet function and a lower HPR rate. In addition, there existed a significant independent association between MPV and high prevalence of HPR in the VASP assay.

Differential Impact of Cytochrome 2C19 Allelic Variants on Three Different Platelet Function Tests in Clopidogrel-Treated Patients

On-treatment platelet reactivity in clopidogrel-treated patients can be measured with several platelet function tests (PFTs). However, the agreement between different PFTs is only slight to moderate. Polymorphisms of the CYP2C19 gene have an impact on the metabolization of clopidogrel and, thereby, have an impact on on-treatment platelet reactivity. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the differential effects of the CYP2C19 genotype on three different PFTs. Methods: From a prospective cohort study, we included patients treated with clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One month after PCI, we simultaneously performed three different PFTs; light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow P2Y12, and Multiplate. In whole EDTA blood, genotyping of the CYP2C19 polymorphisms was performed. Results: We included 308 patients treated with clopidogrel in combination with aspirin (69.5%) and/or anticoagulants (33.8%) and, based on CYP2C19 genotyping, classified them as either extensive (36.4%), rapid (34.7%), intermediate (26.0%), or poor metabolizers (2.9%). On-treatment platelet reactivity as measured by LTA and VerifyNow is significantly affected by CYP2C19 metabolizer status (p < 0.01); as metabolizer status changes from rapid, via extensive and intermediate, to poor, the mean platelet reactivity increases accordingly (p < 0.01). On the contrary, for Multiplate, no such ordering of metabolizer groups was found (p = 0.10). Conclusions: For VerifyNow and LTA, the on-treatment platelet reactivity in clopidogrel-treated patients correlates well with the underlying CYP2C19 polymorphism. For Multiplate, no major effect of genetic background could be shown, and effects of other (patient-related) variables prevail. Thus, besides differences in test principles and the influence of patient-related factors, the disagreement between PFTs is partly explained by differential effects of the CYP2C19 genotype.

Multi-parameter phenotyping of platelet reactivity for stratification of human cohorts

Accurate and comprehensive assessment of platelet function across cohorts of donors may be key to understanding the risk of thrombotic events associated with cardiovascular disease, and hence help personalise the application of antiplatelet drugs. However, platelet function tests can be difficult to perform and analyse, unreliable or uninformative and poorly standardised across studies. The Platelet Phenomic Analysis (PPAnalysis) assay and associated open-source software platform was developed in response to these challenges. PPAnalysis utilises pre-prepared freeze-dried microtitre plates to provide a detailed characterisation of platelet function. The automated analysis of the high-dimensional data enables the identification of sub-populations of donors with distinct platelet function phenotypes. Using this approach we identified that the Sensitivity of a donor's platelets to an agonist and their Capacity to generate a functional response are distinct independent metrics of platelet reactivity. Hierarchical clustering of these metrics identified six subgroups with distinct platelet phenotypes within healthy cohorts, indicating that platelet reactivity does not fit into the traditional simple categories of 'high' and 'low' responders. These platelet phenotypes were found to exist in two independent cohorts of healthy donors and were stable on recall. PPAnalysis is a powerful tool for stratification of cohorts on the basis of platelet reactivity which will enable investigation of the causes and consequences of differences in platelet function and drive progress towards precision medicine.

Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in the treatment of Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: effects on platelet function assessed by platelet function tests and mean platelet volume

Background: Knowledge on the pharmacodynamic effects of antiplatelet drugs including clopidogrel and ticagrelor on Asian patients is scarce. We aim to evaluate the effects of the two drugs on platelet reactivity in the treatment of Chinese patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), using two platelet function tests (PFT). Meanwhile, the relationship between mean platelet volume (MPV), a routine index of platelet size, and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is also investigated.Methods: Patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were scheduled for the assessment of platelet reactivity at 2–3 days after PCI. Two PFTs, light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)-FCM assay, were applied in the evaluation of platelet reactivity. The MPV was measured simultaneously with EDTA plasma using a Sysmex XN 2000 automated hematology analyzer.Results: The final study population included the aspirin + clopidogrel group (n = 46) and the aspirin + ticagrelor group (n = 66). In the aspirin + ticagrelor group, the maximal light transmittance (LT) changes in response to 5 µM ADP assessed by LTA was obviously lower than that in the aspirin + clopidogrel group (P < 0.001). The platelet reactivity index (PRI) level in the VASP test was also markedly lower in the group given aspirin and ticagrelor (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in HPR between the two groups. MPV showed a potent ability to predict the presence of HPR at VASP assay (AUC = 0.788, 95% CI: 0.701–0.875, P < 0.001) in receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis.Conclusions: Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor has dramatically greater antiplatelet effect, with a superiority in suppressing platelet function and a lower HPR rate. In addition, there existed a significant independent association between MPV and high prevalence of HPR in the VASP assay.

Fully automated light transmission aggregometry on a disc for platelet function tests

Platelet function tests, a group of assays that measure the ability of platelets to aggregate and promote clotting in a sample of blood, are performed in various medical fields to...

Is “one size fits all” anti-aggregation really effective? Variability in the response to P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in obese patients

Background Different “ex vivo” studies have shown both a greater platelet activation and higher rates of resistance to clopidogrel in obese patients. Although there is less evidence, less prasugrel activity has also been observed in these patients. Our aim was to study the variability of the response to clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasugrel in obese patients, defined as a body mass index ≥30. Methods Prospective, multicenter, observational, pharmacodynamic study, conducted in a Spanish population of patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and double anti-aggregation with acetylsalicylic acid and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. Platelet function tests were performed the morning after the ICP and 30 days after it, including: 1) VerifyNow P2Y12 assay; 2) multiple electrode aggreometry (Multiplate); and 3) VASP analysis. Results Of the total patients included (988), 300 were obese (30.3%). The obese group was younger (62.8±12 years vs 64.9±12), had a higher incidence of arterial hypertension (76.3% vs. 56.7%), diabetes mellitus (35% vs. 27.5%); and lower incidence of chronic kidney disease (7.7% vs. 17%). There were no differences in the acute phase (day 1 after PCI) in the pharmacodynamic response to any of the P2Y12 inhibitors used. After 30 days, greater platelet aggregation (decreased response) was documented in obese patients treated with prasugrel according to VASP tests (PRI in non-obese 23.9±13% vs. 30.4±14.7% in obese, p 0.035) and MEA (area under the aggregation units curve in non-obese 251.7±104.1 vs 320±166.7 in obese, p 0.007) and a numerical trend with VerifyNow. A trend in the same direction was also observed in patients treated with clopidogrel that did not reach statistical significance with all the platelet function tests used. No differences were observed in the ticagrelor group. Conclusion Obese patients with an ACS treated with PCI have a worse response to thienopyridines than non-obese patients in the maintenance phase of antiaggregant treatment, while the response to ticagrelor is not affected by obesity. Completing the clinical follow-up proposed by the registry is necessary to know if these differences have an implication in cardiovascular events. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS)

Pharmacodynamic comparison of optimal platelet reactivity by multiple platelet function tests in Korean acute coronary syndrome patients with half-dose ticagrelor or prasugrel treatment

Background East Asians treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors, prasugrel or ticagrelor exhibit more potent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. Whether half-dose de-escalation strategy would improve optimal platelet reactivity at maintenance in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains uncertain. Method In de-escalation strategy single center study, eligible Korean ACS patients (n=96) were assigned to receive standard-dose ticagrelor (n=33), prasugrel (n=28), followed by half-dose reduction at 1 month for maintenance, and clopidogrel (n=35) as control. Platelet reactivity was measured by VerifyNow, light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA). The investigators aim to compare optimal platelet reactivity status (OPR, defined as 85–208 P2Y12 reaction unit [PRU] for VerifyNow (VN), 16%–47% for LTA and 19–46 U for MEA) among 3 different platelet function tests at 3 months post PCI. Results At 3 months, ticagrelor achieved significantly lower PRU (17 [6–51] vs. 95 [61–151] vs. 172 [111–204]) than prasugrel and clopidogrel, resulting OPR rate 10% vs. 57.7% vs. 60.0%, respectively. Similar results were observed at LTA method (2% [0–12] in ticagrelor vs. 18% [13–22] in prasugrel vs. 18% [11–30] in clopidogrel), with OPR rate 11.8% vs. 69.2% vs. 50.0%, respectively. However, platelet reactivity was similar by MEA method (16 [13–20] in ticagrelor vs. 17 [13–22] in prasugrel vs. 19 [14–28] in clopidogrel), with OPR rate 33.3% vs. 40.0% vs. 42.0%, respectively (all p&gt;0.005). Among the three tests, resulting higher correlation between VN and LTA (r=0.745), MEA and LTA vs. MEA and VN showed lower correlations (r=0.412 and r=0.303). (Fig.) Conclusion In Korean ACS patients with half-dose de-escalation strategy after 1 month, OPR rate in ticagrelor is still rare during 3-month treatment by VN and LTA methods, however, prasugrel appears comparable to clopidogrel. VN/LTA might overestimate platelet function than MEA or MEA underestimate OPR rate than VN/LTA. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): National Research Foundation of Korea