scholarly journals Double-balloon enteroscopy for ERCP in patients with Billroth II anatomy: results of a large series of papillary large-balloon dilation for biliary stone removal

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (03) ◽  
pp. E216-E222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Liang Cheng ◽  
Nai-Jen Liu ◽  
Jui-Hsiang Tang ◽  
Ming-Chin Yu ◽  
Yi-Ning Tsui ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1234-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Chang Chu ◽  
Shin-Jung Su ◽  
Chi-Chieh Yang ◽  
Yung-Hsiang Yeh ◽  
Chien-Hua Chen ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 499-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Huibregtse

Biliary sphincter balloon dilation for biliary stone removal was introduced in 1983. In the early 1990s, several groups studied this technique further. The success rate of stone removal is comparable with that of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with fewer than three stones that are less then 1 cm in diameter. Fewer complications after balloon dilation than after endoscopic sphincterotomy have been noted in most studies. One study, however, showed a higher incidence of pancreatitis and, in particular, severe pancreatitis. Therefore, there is still some reluctance among endoscopists to promote balloon dilation as a routine first choice treatment. The technique, however, is accepted as the treatment of choice in patients with a bleeding tendency and those in whom the local anatomy is associated with an increased risk of complications with endoscopic sphincterotomy, such as patients with periampullary diverticula or Billroth II gastrectomy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. E131-E138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomazo Franzini ◽  
Renata Moura ◽  
Priscilla Bonifácio ◽  
Gustavo Luz ◽  
Thiago de Souza ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic removal of biliary stones has high success rates, ranging between 85 % to 95 %. Nevertheless, some stones may be challenging and different endoscopic methods have evolved. Papillary large balloon dilation after sphincterotomy is a widely used technique with success rates ranging from 68 to 90 % for stones larger than 15 mm. Cholangioscopy allows performing lithotripsy under direct biliary visualization, either by laser or electrohydraulic waves, which have similar success rate (80 % – 90 %). However, there is no study comparing these 2 techniques. Patients and methods From April 2014 to June 2016, 100 patients were enrolled and randomized in 2 groups, using a non-inferiority hypothesis: cholangioscopy + electrohydraulic lithotripsy (group 1) and endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (group 2). The main outcome was complete stone removal. Adverse events were documented. Mechanical lithotripsy was not performed. Failure cases had a second session with crossover of the methods. Results The mean age was 56 years. 74 (75.5 %) patients were female. The initial overall complete stone removal rate was 74.5 % (77.1 % in group 1 and 72 % in group 2, P > 0.05). After second session the overall success rate achieved 90.1 %. Procedure time was significantly lower in group 2, – 25.2 min (CI95 % – 12.48 to – 37.91). There were no significant differences regarding technical success rate, radiologic exposure and adverse events. Conclusion Single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy and papillary large balloon dilation are effective and safe approaches for removing complex biliary stones.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheol Woong Choi ◽  
Jung Sik Choi ◽  
Dae Hwan Kang ◽  
Bong Gap Kim ◽  
Hyung Wook Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hiroshi Yamauchi ◽  
Tomohisa Iwai ◽  
Kosuke Okuwaki ◽  
Eiji Miyata ◽  
Yusuke Kawaguchi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document