Genauigkeit von Single-Breath-Hold vs. Non-Breath-Hold Compressed-Sensing Kardio-MRT Datensätzen für die LV-Volumetrie

Author(s):  
S Sudarski ◽  
H Haubenreisser ◽  
C Dösch ◽  
S Haneder ◽  
T Henzler ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Javier Royuela-del-Val ◽  
Muhammad Usman ◽  
Lucilio Cordero-Grande ◽  
Marcos Martin-Fernandez ◽  
Federico Simmross-Wattenberg ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 882-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Vincenti ◽  
Pierre Monney ◽  
Jérôme Chaptinel ◽  
Tobias Rutz ◽  
Simone Coppo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 1110-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Qing ◽  
Talissa A. Altes ◽  
Nicholas J. Tustison ◽  
Xue Feng ◽  
Xiao Chen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1930
Author(s):  
Benjamin Longère ◽  
Julien Pagniez ◽  
Augustin Coisne ◽  
Hedi Farah ◽  
Michaela Schmidt ◽  
...  

Background and objective: To evaluate the reliability of compressed-sensing (CS) real-time single-breath-hold cine imaging for quantification of right ventricular (RV) function and volumes in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients in comparison with the standard multi-breath-hold technique. Methods: Sixty-one consecutive CHD patients (mean age = 22.2 ± 9.0 (SD) years) were prospectively evaluated during either the initial work-up or after repair. For each patient, two series of cine images were acquired: first, the reference segmented multi-breath-hold steady-state free-precession sequence (SSFPref), including a short-axis stack, one four-chamber slice, and one long-axis slice; then, an additional real-time compressed-sensing single-breath-hold sequence (CSrt) providing the same slices. Two radiologists independently assessed the image quality and RV volumes for both techniques, which were compared using the Wilcoxon test and paired Student’s t test, Bland–Altman, and linear regression analyses. The visualization of wall-motion disorders and tricuspid-regurgitation-related signal voids were also analyzed. Results: The mean acquisition time for CSrt was 22.4 ± 6.2 (SD) s (95% CI: 20.8–23.9 s) versus 442.2 ± 89.9 (SD) s (95% CI: 419.2–465.2 s) for SSFPref (p < 0.001). The image quality of CSrt was diagnostic in all examinations and was mostly rated as good (n = 49/61; 80.3%). There was a high correlation between SSFPref and CSrt images regarding RV ejection fraction (49.8 ± 7.8 (SD)% (95% CI: 47.8–51.8%) versus 48.7 ± 8.6 (SD)% (95% CI: 46.5–50.9%), respectively; r = 0.94) and RV end-diastolic volume (192.9 ± 60.1 (SD) mL (95% CI: 177.5–208.3 mL) versus 194.9 ± 62.1 (SD) mL (95% CI: 179.0–210.8 mL), respectively; r = 0.98). In CSrt images, tricuspid-regurgitation and wall-motion disorder visualization was good (area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.87) and excellent (AUC = 1), respectively. Conclusions: Compressed-sensing real-time cine imaging enables, in one breath hold, an accurate assessment of RV function and volumes in CHD patients in comparison with standard SSFPref, allowing a substantial improvement in time efficiency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document