Gap-Balancing versus Measured Resection Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 013-016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Churchill ◽  
Anton Khlopas ◽  
Assem Sultan ◽  
Steven Harwin ◽  
Michael Mont
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Gap Balancing ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Measured Resection ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ks Function

AbstractProper femoral component alignment in the axial plane during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on accurate bone cuts and soft tissue balancing. Two methods that are used to achieve this are “measured resection” and “gap balancing.” However, a controversy exists as to which method is more accurate and leads to better outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate: (1) implant survivorship, (2) patient outcomes, (3) complications, and (4) radiographic analysis comparing patients who underwent TKA with either gap-balancing or measured resection techniques. A total of 214 consecutive patients (221 knees) underwent primary TKA by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2012. Component alignment was achieved by using measured resection in 116 knees and gap balancing was used in 105 knees. The patients had a mean age of 66 years (range, 44–86 years) and a mean body mass index of 32 kg/m2 (range, 22–52 kg/m2). Patient range-of-motion (ROM) and Knee Society (KS) function and pain scores, and radiographic assessment, were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at ∼6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and then annually. The mean follow-up time was 3 years. A Kaplan–Meier's analysis was performed to calculate the survivorship. The aseptic survivorship was 98% in both the measured resection and gap-balancing groups. The mean ROM was not significantly different between the measured resection and gap-balancing groups (123 vs. 123 degrees, p = 0.990). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the KS function scores (86 vs. 85 points, p = 0.829) or the KS pain scores (93 vs. 92 points, p = 0.425). Otherwise, the radiographic evaluation at latest follow-up did not demonstrate any evidence of progressive radiolucencies or loosening, of any prosthesis. The results of this study found that at a mean follow-up of 3 years, both the measured resection and gap-balancing techniques achieved excellent survivorship and postoperative outcomes. This demonstrates that both methods can be used to achieve accurate femoral component alignment with similar short-term outcomes.

scholarly journals Spacer-based gap balancing is useful in total knee arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up of a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhui Hu ◽  
Da Song ◽  
Yi Liu ◽  
Yong Zhao ◽  
Wenpu Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Medial Condyle ◽  
Gap Balancing ◽  
Measured Resection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Which technique, gap balancing or measured resection, can obtain better femoral component alignment and soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. This study aimed to determine whether the gap balancing technique using a modified spacer block in TKA can result in better postoperative clinical outcomes than the measured resection technique. Methods A total of 124 patients who underwent consecutive primary TKA between May 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The gap balancing technique assisted by a modified spacer block was used in 61 patients, and the measured resection technique was used in 63 patients. The surgical, imaging and knee function outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results The thickness of the posterior medial condyle bone resection using the modified spacer block tool in gap balancing was significantly larger than that of the MR technique (P = 0.001). Compared with the measured resection group, the gap balancing group had a greater external rotation resection angle of the femur (4.06 ± 1.10° vs. 3.19 ± 0.59°, P < 0.001°). Despite these differences, the mean ROM, KSS scores, and WOMAC scores at the 6-week, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups were not significantly different. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups in mechanical axis measurements (P = 0.275), the number of HKA outliers (P = 0.795) or the joint line displacement (P = 0.270). Conclusion The functional outcomes of the gap balancing technique based on the modified spacer are similar to those of measured resection at 3 years. Compared with the MR technique, the GB technique resulted in a greater external rotation resection angle and thicker posterior medial condylar cuts in TKA with knee varus.

Manipulation under anaesthesia after primary total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (6 Supple A) ◽  
pp. 126-130
Author(s):  
Brian P. Chalmers ◽  
Enrique Goytizolo ◽  
Mithun D. Mishu ◽  
Geoffrey H. Westrich
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Neuraxial Anaesthesia ◽  
Manipulation Under Anaesthesia ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Sedation Group

Aims Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) remains an effective intervention to address restricted range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and occurs in 2% to 3% of primary TKAs at our institution. Since there are few data on the outcomes of MUA with different anaesthetic methods, we sought to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing MUA with intravenous (IV) sedation and neuraxial anaesthesia. Methods We identified 548 MUAs after primary TKA (136 IV sedation, 412 neuraxial anaesthesia plus IV sedation) from March 2016 to July 2019. The mean age of this cohort was 62 years (35 to 88) with a mean body mass index of 31 kg/m2 (18 to 49). The mean time from primary TKA to MUA was 10.2 weeks (6.2 to 24.3). Pre-MUA ROM was similar between groups; overall mean pre-MUA extension was 4.2° (p = 0.452) and mean pre-MUA flexion was 77° (p = 0.372). We compared orthopaedic complications, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, length of stay (LOS), and immediate and three-month follow-up knee ROM between these groups. Results Following MUA, patients with IV sedation had higher mean VAS pain scores of 5.2 (SD 1.8) compared to 4.1 (SD = 1.5) in the neuraxial group (p < 0.001). The mean LOS was shorter in patients that received IV sedation (9.5 hours (4 to 31)) compared to neuraxial anaesthesia (11.9 hours (4 to 51)) (p = 0.009), but an unexpected overnight stay was similar in each group (8.6%). Immediate-post MUA ROM was 1° to 121° in the IV sedation group and 0.9° to 123° in the neuraxial group (p = 0.313). Three-month follow-up ROM was 2° to 108° in the IV sedation group and 1.9° to 110° in the neuraxial anaesthesia group (p = 0.325) with a mean loss of 13° (ranging from 5° gain to 60° loss), in both groups by three months. No patients in either group sustained a complication. Conclusion IV sedation alone and neuraxial anaesthesia are both effective anaesthetic methods for MUA after primary TKA. Surgeons and anaesthetists should offer these anaesthetic techniques to match patient-specific needs as the orthopaedic outcomes are similar. Also, patients should be counselled that ROM following MUA may decrease over time. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):126–130.

scholarly journals FRI0418 SELECTIVE PATELLAR RESURFACING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIC KNEE: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 807.3-807
Author(s):  
I. Moriyama
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patellofemoral Joint ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽  
Patellar Resurfacing ◽  
Criterion A ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean

Background:No widely accepted view or criteria currently exist concerning whether or not patellar replacement (resurfacing) should accompany total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee.1)2)3)Objectives:We recently devised our own criteria for application of patellar replacement and performed selective patellar replacement in accordance with this set of criteria. The clinical outcome was analyzed.Methods:The study involved 1150 knees on which total knee arthroplasty was performed between 2005 and 2019 because of osteoarthritis of the knee. The mean age at operation was 73, and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 91 months. Our criteria for application of patellar replacement are given below. Criterion A pertains to evaluation of preoperative clinical symptoms related to the patellofemoral joint: (a) interview regarding presence/absence of pain around the patella, (b) cracking or pain heard or felt when standing up from a low chair, (c) pain when going upstairs/downstairs. Because it is difficult for individual patients to identify the origin of pain (patellofemoral joint or femorotibial joint), the examiner advised each patient about the location of the patellofemoral joint when checking for these symptoms. Criterion B pertains to intense narrowing or disappearance of the patellofemoral joint space on preoperative X-ray of the knee. Criterion C pertains to the intraoperatively assessed extent of patellar cartilage degeneration corresponding to class 4 of the Outerbridge classification. Patellar replacement was applied to cases satisfying at least one of these sets of criteria (A-a,-b,-c, B and C). Postoperatively, pain of the patellofemoral joint was evaluated again at the time of the last observation, using Criterion A-a,-b,-c.Results:Patellar replacement was applied to 110 knees in accordance with the criteria mentioned above. There were 82 knees satisfying at least one of the Criterion sets A-a,-b,-c, 39 knees satisfying Criterion B and 70 knees satisfying Criterion C. (Some knees satisfied 2 or 3 of Criteria A, B and C).When the pain originating from patellofemoral joint (Criterion A) was clinically assessed at the time of last observation, pain was not seen in any knee of the replacement group and the non-replacement group.Conclusion:Whether or not patellar replacement is needed should be determined on the basis of the symptoms or findings related to the patellofemoral joint, and we see no necessity of patellar replacement in cases free of such symptoms/findings. When surgery was performed in accordance with the criteria on patellar replacement as devised by us, the clinical outcome of the operated patellofemoral joint was favorable, although the follow-up period was not long. Although further follow-up is needed, the results obtained indicate that selective patellar replacement yields favorable outcome if applied to cases judged indicated with appropriate criteria.References:[1]The Effect of Surgeon Preference for Selective Patellar Resurfacing on Revision Risk in Total Knee Replacement: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of 136,116 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.Vertullo CJ, Graves SE, Cuthbert AR, Lewis PL J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 17;101(14):1261-1270[2]Resurfaced versus Non-Resurfaced Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Allen W1, Eichinger J, Friedman R. Indian J Orthop. 2018 Jul-Aug;52(4):393-398.[3]Is Selectively Not Resurfacing the Patella an Acceptable Practice in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?Maradit-Kremers H, Haque OJ, Kremers WK, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1143-1147.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 1304-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Tigani ◽  
G. Sabbioni ◽  
R. Ben Ayad ◽  
M. Filanti ◽  
N. Rani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Gap Balancing ◽  
Measured Resection ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Gap Balancing Versus Measured Resection Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 835-844
Author(s):  
Eva De Wachter ◽  
Johan Vanlauwe ◽  
Robert Krause ◽  
Hans Bayer-Helms ◽  
Dirk Ganzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Radiographic Outcome ◽  
Gap Balancing ◽  
Measured Resection ◽  
Total Knee

CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS OF TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT USING PATIENT-SPECIFIC POSITIONING GUIDES WITH AT LEAST 5 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP

2020 ◽  
pp. 2050020
Author(s):  
Xabier Foruria ◽  
Jesús Moreta ◽  
Carlos Jaramillo ◽  
Ane Anton ◽  
Isidoro Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Knee Score ◽  
Conventional Instrumentation ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results ◽  
Coronal Malalignment

Objective: Patient-specific positioning guides have been designed to improve precision in total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to evaluate the medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes with magnetic resonance imaging-based patient-specific positioning guides. Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients from two centers treated with total knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific positioning guides. We enrolled patients operated on between January 2011 and December 2013, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Preoperative and postoperative hip knee angle (HKA) and position of each component in the coronal plane were assessed. Overall malalignment was defined as an outlier of more than [Formula: see text] from the neutral mechanical axis and specific malalignment as when any component showed more than [Formula: see text] of deviation. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee Score. Results: This study included 68 patients with a mean age of 72 years. The mean postoperative alignment (HKA) was [Formula: see text] and 26.5% of patients showed coronal malalignment [Formula: see text]. Regarding femoral components, 19.1% showed specific malalignment [Formula: see text], while 11.7% of tibial components were classified as outliers. The mean HSS Knee Score at final follow up was 89.2. Patients whose implants were mechanically aligned did not obtain better functional outcomes ([Formula: see text]). Conclusion: In our series, the use of patient-specific positioning guides resulted in a range of mechanical malalignment, similar to conventional instrumentation results reported in the literature.

Routine Histopathological Analysis of the Synovium in Patients with Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (01) ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
Ali Utkan ◽  
Emrah Caliskan ◽  
Batuhan Gencer ◽  
Bulent Ozkurt
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Histopathological Analysis ◽  
Knee Score ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Primary Total Knee

AbstractAlthough there are numerous studies about routine histopathological analysis during arthroplasty surgeries, most of them showed that new diagnoses have rarely been obtained as a result. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of routine pathological analyses of synovia resected during primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis and its relevance in the treatment process. Of the 47 included patients who were followed up prospectively, 26 patients had clinical and histopathological concordant diagnoses and 21 patients had discrepant diagnoses. Oxford knee score and visual analogue score were performed for all the patients. Kallgren-Lawrence score was used for radiological analyses. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to examine the differences between the abnormally distributed variables. Mean age was 65.9 ± 4.3 years (range, 50–89 years) and mean follow-up time was 19 ± 7.8 months (range, 6–39 months). Grade IV gonarthrosis was found to be statistically lower in the discrepant group (p = 0.046). The mean preoperative Oxford knee score was 16.8 ± 2.3 (range, 2–23) and the mean postoperative Oxford knee score was 44.6 ± 1.8 (range, 27–48; p = 0.016). Postoperative Oxford knee scores and VAS were significantly increased in both the concordant and discrepant groups (p = 0.026 and p = 0.035, p = 0.019 and p = 0.039, respectively). Resection and histopathologic analyses of the hypertrophied and inflamed synovium encountered during primary arthroplasty procedure should be performed. This examination not only could provide crucial information that may influence the postoperative follow-up guidelines but also could help us to expand our knowledge and awareness of rare diseases that might yield osteoarthritis. The level of evidence for the study is level II.

Comparison of Gap Balancing vs Measured Resection Technique in Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: One Technique per Knee

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 732-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachin R. Tapasvi ◽  
Anshu Shekhar ◽  
Shantanu S. Patil ◽  
Matthew V. Dipane ◽  
Madhav Chowdhry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Gap Balancing ◽  
Measured Resection ◽  
Total Knee
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document