Spacer-based gap balancing is useful in total knee arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up of a retrospective study

Abstract Background Which technique, gap balancing or measured resection, can obtain better femoral component alignment and soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. This study aimed to determine whether the gap balancing technique using a modified spacer block in TKA can result in better postoperative clinical outcomes than the measured resection technique. Methods A total of 124 patients who underwent consecutive primary TKA between May 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The gap balancing technique assisted by a modified spacer block was used in 61 patients, and the measured resection technique was used in 63 patients. The surgical, imaging and knee function outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results The thickness of the posterior medial condyle bone resection using the modified spacer block tool in gap balancing was significantly larger than that of the MR technique (P = 0.001). Compared with the measured resection group, the gap balancing group had a greater external rotation resection angle of the femur (4.06 ± 1.10° vs. 3.19 ± 0.59°, P < 0.001°). Despite these differences, the mean ROM, KSS scores, and WOMAC scores at the 6-week, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups were not significantly different. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups in mechanical axis measurements (P = 0.275), the number of HKA outliers (P = 0.795) or the joint line displacement (P = 0.270). Conclusion The functional outcomes of the gap balancing technique based on the modified spacer are similar to those of measured resection at 3 years. Compared with the MR technique, the GB technique resulted in a greater external rotation resection angle and thicker posterior medial condylar cuts in TKA with knee varus.

Download Full-text

Gap-Balancing versus Measured Resection Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison Study

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0037-1608820 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 31 (01) ◽

pp. 013-016 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Jessica Churchill ◽

Anton Khlopas ◽

Assem Sultan ◽

Steven Harwin ◽

Michael Mont

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Component Alignment ◽

Gap Balancing ◽

Pain Scores ◽

Measured Resection ◽

Total Knee ◽

The Mean ◽

Ks Function

AbstractProper femoral component alignment in the axial plane during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on accurate bone cuts and soft tissue balancing. Two methods that are used to achieve this are “measured resection” and “gap balancing.” However, a controversy exists as to which method is more accurate and leads to better outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate: (1) implant survivorship, (2) patient outcomes, (3) complications, and (4) radiographic analysis comparing patients who underwent TKA with either gap-balancing or measured resection techniques. A total of 214 consecutive patients (221 knees) underwent primary TKA by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2012. Component alignment was achieved by using measured resection in 116 knees and gap balancing was used in 105 knees. The patients had a mean age of 66 years (range, 44–86 years) and a mean body mass index of 32 kg/m2 (range, 22–52 kg/m2). Patient range-of-motion (ROM) and Knee Society (KS) function and pain scores, and radiographic assessment, were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at ∼6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and then annually. The mean follow-up time was 3 years. A Kaplan–Meier's analysis was performed to calculate the survivorship. The aseptic survivorship was 98% in both the measured resection and gap-balancing groups. The mean ROM was not significantly different between the measured resection and gap-balancing groups (123 vs. 123 degrees, p = 0.990). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the KS function scores (86 vs. 85 points, p = 0.829) or the KS pain scores (93 vs. 92 points, p = 0.425). Otherwise, the radiographic evaluation at latest follow-up did not demonstrate any evidence of progressive radiolucencies or loosening, of any prosthesis. The results of this study found that at a mean follow-up of 3 years, both the measured resection and gap-balancing techniques achieved excellent survivorship and postoperative outcomes. This demonstrates that both methods can be used to achieve accurate femoral component alignment with similar short-term outcomes.

Download Full-text

Should We Resect Hoffa's Fat Pad during Total Knee Replacement?

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0037-1598039 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 30 (09) ◽

pp. 894-897 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Alun Yewlett ◽

Ryan Trickett ◽

Mark Forster ◽

Adel Ghandour ◽

Hannah Sellars

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Fat Pad ◽

Hoffa’S Fat Pad ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee ◽

The Mean ◽

The Difference ◽

The One

AbstractResection of Hoffa's fat pad during total knee arthroplasty is sometimes performed to improve access and view. Opponents of this technique argue that sacrificing the fat pad potentially compromises blood supply to the patellar tendon and it can subsequently shorten. Our objective was to identify any difference in the Insall-Salvati ratio of knees undergoing total knee arthroplasty between a cohort that had Hoffa's fat pad preserved and the one that had Hoffa's fat pad completely excised. The total knee arthroplasties by two surgeons at our institution were reviewed over a 3-year period. Surgeon A routinely preserves the fat pad and surgeon B routinely excises the fat pad. Radiographs preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at a minimum of 1-year follow up were analyzed for the Insall-Salvati ratio. A total of 161 knees were reviewed, 65 in the preserved group and 96 in the excised group with a mean age of 67 and 70 years, respectively. The mean preoperative Insall-Salvati ratio for the preserved group was 1.12 (±0.145) and excised group 1.16 (±0.168) (p = 0.094). The mean immediate postoperative Insall-Salvati ratio for the preserved group was 1.10 (±0.154) and for excised group 1.18 (±0.194). The difference in Insall-Salvati ratio from preoperative to the immediate postoperative period in the preserved group compared with the excised group demonstrated a significant difference (p = 0.010). However, the change of Insall-Salvati ratio at 1 year did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.059). There does not appear to be any difference in the Insall-Salvati ratios of both groups at 1 year's follow up; therefore, this study radiologically at least supports the use of either technique.

Download Full-text

The Effect of Intra- vs. Extramedullary Tibial Guides on the Alignment of Lower Extremity and Functional Outcomes following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial

10.21203/rs.3.rs-505262/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Mohammadreza Razzaghof ◽

SM Javad Mortazavi ◽

Alireza Moharrami ◽

Pouya Tabatabaei Irani ◽

Abbas Noori

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Definitive Treatment ◽

Normal Ranges ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee ◽

The Mean

Abstract Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been known as a definitive treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis. Both intra- (IM) and extramedullary (EM) tibial guides have been used to restore the desired extremity alignment. However, controversy exists regarding the superiority of either technique. We aimed to compare their functional outcomes and accuracy in providing neutral alignment after TKA. Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial, we studied 98 patients undergoing primary TKA in two groups of IM and EM. We measured the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), varus angle (VA), and joint-line convergence angle with normal ranges of 90°±3°, 0-2°, and 0±3°, respectively, on a three-joint alignment view after three months. We also assessed functional outcomes at the last follow-up. Finally, we compared these outcomes between groups. Results: Eighty-four patients (IM=42, EM=42) were included in the final analysis (16 males, 68 females; mean age: 63.9±8.6 years; mean follow-up: 27±2.9 months). The mean postoperative alignment angles showed no significant difference, although MPTA outliers were significantly more frequent in the EM group (26.2% vs. 9.5% in IM, P=0.04). None of the functional outcomes showed a significant difference between groups. However, the mean ROM increase was significantly higher in VAs within ±3° of normal than those outside it (30.8 vs. 27.4, respectively; P=0.039). Conclusions: We conclude that both techniques were not different in terms of the mean alignment angles and functional outcomes. However, fewer MPTA outliers can be seen with IM. A postoperative mechanical axis within ±3° of neutral can result in a more ROM increase after one year. Trial registration: IRCT, IRCT20160809029286N5. Registered 21 April 2020, https://www.irct.ir/trial/46976

Download Full-text

Patelloplasty in total knee arthroplasty with circumpatellar denervation versus without denervation – a randomized prospective study

Arthroplasty ◽

10.1186/s42836-020-00044-6 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

Author(s):

S. R. K. Deekshith ◽

K. J. Reddy ◽

R. Raviteja

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Knee Pain ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Anterior Knee Pain ◽

Kujala Score ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee ◽

The Mean ◽

Anterior Knee

Abstract Introduction Anterior knee pain is one of the major problems in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and is often etiologically associated with a patellofemoral parts etiology. There is no consensus as to etiology or treatment. Denervation of the patella by electrocautery and patelloplasty along with removal of osteophytes have been used for treatment of anterior knee pain in TKA. The purpose of our study was to compare, in terms of the anterior knee pain and clinical outcomes of patelloplasty in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patellar denervation by electrocautery and non-patellar-denervation treatment in a 2 year follow-up. Materials and methods This study was conducted in a total of 108 patients, who underwent TKA at our institution between June 2015 and December 2016. Patients age 55 to 80 years, who are suffering from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis of knee were included in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into patelloplasty with denervation group and non-denervation group. The denervation of the patella was done in electrocautery group using a monopolar coagulation diathermy set to 50 W. (Valleylab Inc., Boulder, CO). Postoperatively, patients were assessed at regular intervals of 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 months. To assess patient outcomes, we used questionnaires to determine the Knee Society score (KSS - knee and function scores), a specific patellofemoral pain questionnaire (Kujala score) range of motion (ROM) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess anterior knee pain. Results The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD. Of the 108 patients, 9 patients were lost to follow-up. Among the remaining 99 patients, 50 were included in denervation group and 49 in non-denervation group. In our study, there was no statistically significant difference in Mean KUJALA score preoperatively (p > 0.05). Postoperatively, the mean KUJALA score was significantly higher in denervation group at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 months of follow-up when compared to TKR with no denervation (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in Mean VAS score preoperatively (p > 0.05). However, 6, 12 and 24 months after the operation, the mean VAS score was significantly lower in denervation group. There was no statistically significant difference in Mean KSS score preoperatively and postoperatively (p > 0.05). The mean ROM was significantly higher in denervation group than in the group of TKR with no denervation (p < 0.05). Conclusion In our study, less postoperative anterior knee pain, increased range of motion, significantly lower VAS scores were seen in the denervation group compared with non-denervation group. Circumferential denervation of patella during primary TKA along with patellar resurfacing is a safe procedure that improves patient satisfaction, decreases anterior knee pain and improves range of flexion in the postoperative period and at postoperative follow-ups.

Download Full-text

FRI0418 SELECTIVE PATELLAR RESURFACING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIC KNEE: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.4074 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 807.3-807

Author(s):

I. Moriyama

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Clinical Outcome ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Patellofemoral Joint ◽

Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽

Patellar Resurfacing ◽

Criterion A ◽

Total Knee ◽

The Mean

Background:No widely accepted view or criteria currently exist concerning whether or not patellar replacement (resurfacing) should accompany total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee.1)2)3)Objectives:We recently devised our own criteria for application of patellar replacement and performed selective patellar replacement in accordance with this set of criteria. The clinical outcome was analyzed.Methods:The study involved 1150 knees on which total knee arthroplasty was performed between 2005 and 2019 because of osteoarthritis of the knee. The mean age at operation was 73, and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 91 months. Our criteria for application of patellar replacement are given below. Criterion A pertains to evaluation of preoperative clinical symptoms related to the patellofemoral joint: (a) interview regarding presence/absence of pain around the patella, (b) cracking or pain heard or felt when standing up from a low chair, (c) pain when going upstairs/downstairs. Because it is difficult for individual patients to identify the origin of pain (patellofemoral joint or femorotibial joint), the examiner advised each patient about the location of the patellofemoral joint when checking for these symptoms. Criterion B pertains to intense narrowing or disappearance of the patellofemoral joint space on preoperative X-ray of the knee. Criterion C pertains to the intraoperatively assessed extent of patellar cartilage degeneration corresponding to class 4 of the Outerbridge classification. Patellar replacement was applied to cases satisfying at least one of these sets of criteria (A-a,-b,-c, B and C). Postoperatively, pain of the patellofemoral joint was evaluated again at the time of the last observation, using Criterion A-a,-b,-c.Results:Patellar replacement was applied to 110 knees in accordance with the criteria mentioned above. There were 82 knees satisfying at least one of the Criterion sets A-a,-b,-c, 39 knees satisfying Criterion B and 70 knees satisfying Criterion C. (Some knees satisfied 2 or 3 of Criteria A, B and C).When the pain originating from patellofemoral joint (Criterion A) was clinically assessed at the time of last observation, pain was not seen in any knee of the replacement group and the non-replacement group.Conclusion:Whether or not patellar replacement is needed should be determined on the basis of the symptoms or findings related to the patellofemoral joint, and we see no necessity of patellar replacement in cases free of such symptoms/findings. When surgery was performed in accordance with the criteria on patellar replacement as devised by us, the clinical outcome of the operated patellofemoral joint was favorable, although the follow-up period was not long. Although further follow-up is needed, the results obtained indicate that selective patellar replacement yields favorable outcome if applied to cases judged indicated with appropriate criteria.References:[1]The Effect of Surgeon Preference for Selective Patellar Resurfacing on Revision Risk in Total Knee Replacement: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of 136,116 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.Vertullo CJ, Graves SE, Cuthbert AR, Lewis PL J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 17;101(14):1261-1270[2]Resurfaced versus Non-Resurfaced Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Allen W1, Eichinger J, Friedman R. Indian J Orthop. 2018 Jul-Aug;52(4):393-398.[3]Is Selectively Not Resurfacing the Patella an Acceptable Practice in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?Maradit-Kremers H, Haque OJ, Kremers WK, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1143-1147.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Safe in Jehovah's Witness Patients—A 12-Year Perspective

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0038-1676372 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 33 (01) ◽

pp. 034-041 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Theodore S. Wolfson ◽

David Novikov ◽

Kevin K. Chen ◽

Kelvin Y. Kim ◽

Afshin A. Anoushiravani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Postoperative Complications ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Blood Management ◽

Folate Supplementation ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee

AbstractDespite the evolution of blood management protocols, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) occasionally requires allogeneic blood transfusion. This poses a particular challenge for Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) who believe that the Bible strictly prohibits the use of blood products. The aim of this study was to compare JW and a matched-control cohort of non-JW candidates undergoing TKA to assess the safety using modern blood management protocols. Fifty-five JW patients (63 knees) who underwent TKA at our institution between 2005 and 2017 were matched to 63 non-JW patients (63 knees). Patient demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative complications including in-hospital complications, revisions, and 90-day readmissions were collected and compared between the groups. Additionally, subgroup analysis was performed comparing JW patients who were administered tranexamic acid (TXA) between the two groups. Baseline demographics did not vary significantly between the study cohorts. The mean follow-up was 3.1 years in both the JW and non-JW cohorts. Postoperative complications, including in-hospital complications (7.9 vs. 4.8%; p = 0.47), revision TKA (1.6 vs. 1.6%; p = 1.00), and 90-day readmission (1.6 vs. 4.8%; p = 0.31) were not significantly different between the JW and non-JW groups. Subgroup analysis demonstrated JW patients who received TXA had a significantly lower decline in postoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) (8.6 vs. 14.0%; p < 0.01). At a follow-up of up to 12 years, JW patients who underwent TKA have outcomes equivalent to non-JW patients without the need for transfusion. Our findings support that surgeons are more likely to optimize JW patients preoperatively with iron and folate supplementation. Despite these variations in preoperative optimization efforts, no significant difference with regard to Hgb or hematocrit levels was demonstrated. Level of evidence is III, retrospective observational study.

Download Full-text

Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy ◽

10.1007/s00167-010-1124-2 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 18 (10) ◽

pp. 1304-1310 ◽

Cited By ~ 44

Author(s):

Domenico Tigani ◽

G. Sabbioni ◽

R. Ben Ayad ◽

M. Filanti ◽

N. Rani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Computer Assisted ◽

Gap Balancing ◽

Measured Resection ◽

Total Knee

Download Full-text

Prospective randomized trial of standard versus highly crosslinked tibial polyethylene in primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

The Bone & Joint Journal ◽

10.1302/0301-620x.101b7.bjj-2018-1126.r2 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 101-B (7_Supple_C) ◽

pp. 33-39 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

P. F. Lachiewicz ◽

J. A. O’Dell

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Randomized Study ◽

Posterior Stabilized ◽

Function Score ◽

Score Change ◽

Osteolytic Lesions ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee

Aims There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of alternative polyethylene bearings in modular, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare standard polyethylene (SP) and highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLP) tibial liners in posterior-stabilized TKA, with osteolysis as the primary outcome and clinical results and the rate of re-operation as the secondary outcomes. Patients and Methods This is a single-surgeon, prospective randomized study involving one design of modular posterior-stabilized TKA. An analysis of 122 TKAs with an SP compression moulded liner and 123 with an XLP liner was performed, with a mean follow-up of six years (2 to 11). Patients were evaluated clinically using the Knee Society score, Lower Extremity Activity Score (LEAS), and the presence of an effusion, and standard radiographs were assessed for radiolucent lines and osteolytic lesions. Results Osteolysis was present in four TKAs (3.3%) in the SP group, and no knees in the XLP group (p = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the Knee Society total score, change in total score, knee function score, change in function score, LEAS, and change in LEAS in the two groups. There was a significant difference in the presence of an effusion (10/122 with SP liners, 1/123 with XLP liners; p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the rate of re-operation between the two groups (p = 0.36). There were no complications related to the XLP liner. Conclusion At this length of follow-up, there were no advantages and no complications related to the use of this XLP tibial liner. The presence of effusion and small osteolytic lesions was more frequent with SP than XLP liners, but of unknown clinical significance. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):33–39

Download Full-text