Introduction: Major crush injury of elbow joint following trauma with extensive injury to skin & soft tissue, bone, tendon, nerves and vessels
remains a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Purpose of this study is to nd out whether the size of the defect, type of ap used and the location
of the soft tissue defect inuence the outcome of soft tissue reconstruction.
Material and methods: A prospective study was performed in all patients with soft tissue defects around the elbow in need of ap cover at Ganga
Medical Centre Coimbatore, Tamilnadu India from April 2014 to December 2015.Patients demographics, defect size, location, type of ap used,
complications and long – term outcomes analysed. Patients Mayo elbow performance score and Likert scale score were recorded for analysis of
functional and aesthetic outcome respectively. The Kruskal wallis test was used for statistical comparison.
Results: Forty three aps were performed primarily for coverage in forty patients. Three patients required two primary aps for reconstruction.
The aps used in our study included 14 local fasciocutaneous aps (32.5%); 20 pedicled aps both locoregional and distant (46.5%) and 9
2 2 Anterolateral thigh free aps (20.9%) The average defect size was 151 cm . For local fasciocutaneous ap the average defect size was 44.7cm ,
2 2 2 2 2 (range, 4-120 cm ), distant pedicled ap was181 cm (range 24- 600 cm ) and for the ALT free ap was 252.2 cm (range 80-450 cm ).
Conclusion: The defect size is the main determinant of the type of ap used and their outcomes.