scholarly journals OxymaPure Coupling Reagents: Beyond Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis

Synthesis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (21) ◽  
pp. 3189-3210
Author(s):  
Ayman El-Faham ◽  
Fernando Albericio ◽  
Srinivasa Rao Manne ◽  
Beatriz G. de la Torre

AbstractOxymaPure [ethyl 2-cyano-2-(hydroxyimino)acetate] is an exceptional reagent with which to suppress racemization and enhance coupling efficiency during amide bond formation. The tremendous popularity of OxymaPure has led to the development of several Oxyma-based reagents. OxymaPure and its derived reagents are widely used in solid- and solution-phase peptide chemistry. This review summarizes the recent developments and applications of OxymaPure and Oxyma-based reagents in peptide chemistry, in particular in solution-phase chemistry. Moreover, the side reaction associated with OxymaPure is also discussed.1 Introduction2 Oxyma-Based Coupling Reagents2.1 Aminium/Uronium Salts of OxymaPure2.2 Phosphonium Salts of OxymaPure2.3 Oxyma-Based Phosphates2.4 Sulfonate Esters of OxymaPure2.5 Benzoate Esters of OxymaPure2.6 Carbonates of OxymaPure Derivatives3 OxymaPure Derivatives4 Other Oxime-Based Additives and Coupling Reagents5 Side Reactions Using OxymaPure Derivatives6 Conclusion7 List of Abbreviations

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 5225-5228
Author(s):  
Deepshikha Verma ◽  
Pillai V N R ◽  
Giriraj Tailor

Protecting groups like Fmoc and coupling both steps are essential to monitoring the Fmoc SPPS (Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis) reaction completion. Reliable methods are used to detect the unreacted number of amino groups for monitoring these two essential reaction steps of coupling and cleavage. The ability to detect the complete coupling, incomplete coupling or failure of coupling we use many colour tests in the laboratory and based on this the Fmoc peptide chemistry allows the control of the completion of the Fmoc cleavage. The most important test used is the Kaiser test and highly recommended to monitor the coupling and cleavage steps. If the result of colour tests is positive after coupling, then the second coupling should be performed. Then again use the colour test to detect the level of coupling. If the result is still slightly positive, repeat coupling with the smaller modification of reagents such as used PyBOP instead of HOBT AND HOAT. These colour tests help in revealing the presence of unreacted amino-functional groups. Thus, we need to block these free N-terminal of amino- acids which help in avoiding the making of deletion of sequence.


Author(s):  
Peter D. White ◽  
Weng C. Chan

Construction of a peptide chain on an insoluble solid support has obvious benefits: separation of the intermediate peptides from soluble reagents and solvents can be effected simply by filtration and washing with consequent savings in time and labour over the corresponding operations in solution synthesis; many of the operations are amenable to automation; excess reagents can be employed to help to drive reactions to completion; and physical losses can be minimized as the peptide remains attached to the support throughout the synthesis. This approach does, however, have its attendant limitations. By-products arising from either incomplete reactions, side reactions, or impure reagents will accumulate on the resin during chain assembly and contaminate the final product. The effects on product purity of achieving less than 100% chemical efficiency in every step are illustrated dramatically in Table 1. This has serious implications with regard to product purification as the impurities generated will, by their nature, be very similar to the desired peptide and therefore extremely difficult to remove. Furthermore, the analytical techniques employed for following the progress of reactions in solution are generally not applicable, and recourse must generally be made to simple qualitative colour tests to detect the presence of residual amines on the solid phase. The principles of solid phase synthesis are illustrated in Figure 1. The C-terminal amino acid residue of the target peptide is attached to an insoluble support via its carboxyl group. Any functional groups in amino acid side chains must be masked with permanent protecting groups that are not affected by the reactions conditions employed during peptide chain assembly. The temporary protecting group masking the α-amino group during the initial resin loading is removed. An excess of the second amino acid is introduced, with the carboxy group of this amino acid being activated for amide bond formation through generation of an activated ester or by reaction with a coupling reagent. After coupling, excess reagents are removed by washing and the protecting group removed from the N-terminus of the dipeptide, prior to addition of the third amino acid residue.


2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 229-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konrad Jastrząbek ◽  
Beata Kolesińska ◽  
Giuseppina Sabatino ◽  
Fabio Rizzolo ◽  
Anna M. Papini ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 4464
Author(s):  
Mahama Alhassan ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
John Lopez ◽  
Fernando Albericio ◽  
Beatriz G. de la Torre

The protection of side-chain arginine in solid-phase peptide synthesis requires attention since current protecting groups have several drawbacks. Herein, the NO2 group, which is scarcely used, has been revisited. This work shows that it prevents the formation of δ-lactam, the most severe side-reaction during the incorporation of Arg. Moreover, it is stable in solution for long periods and can be removed in an easy-to-understand manner. Thus, this protecting group can be removed while the protected peptide is still anchored to the resin, with SnCl2 as reducing agent in mild acid conditions using 2-MeTHF as solvent at 55 °C. Furthermore, we demonstrate that sonochemistry can facilitate the removal of NO2 from multiple Arg-containing peptides.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul W. R. Harris ◽  
Renata Kowalczyk ◽  
Sung-Hyun Yang ◽  
Geoffrey M. Williams ◽  
Margaret A. Brimble

Peptides ◽  
1994 ◽  
pp. 124-126
Author(s):  
L.A. Carpino ◽  
A. El-Faham ◽  
G.A. Truran ◽  
S.A. Triolo ◽  
H. Shroff ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gregory A. Grant

In 1987, an article appeared in the International Journal of Peptide and Protein Research commemorating the 25th anniversary of the development of solid phase peptide synthesis (Barany et al., 1987). While that article dealt with many aspects of peptide synthesis, one statement in particular stands out as exemplifying the rationale for this chapter. It states: “No synthetic endeavor can be considered complete until the product has been adequately purified and subjected to a battery of analytical tests to verify its structure.” The characterization or evaluation of a synthetic peptide is the one step in its production and experimental utilization that will validate the experimental data obtained. Unfortunately, it is also the one step that many investigators all too often give too little attention. If the synthetic product, upon which the theory and performance of the experimental investigation is based, is not the intended product, the conclusions will be incorrect. Without proper characterization, the investigator will either have to be lucky, or be wrong. Worse yet, he or she will not know which is the case. Although today the synthesis of a given peptide is often considered routine, the product should never be taken for granted. Peptide synthesis chemistry, although quite sophisticated, is complex and subject to a variety of problems. These problems, which can manifest themselves as unwanted side reactions and decreased reaction efficiency, are subject to a variety of factors such as reagent quality, incompatible chemistries, instrument malfunctions, sequence specific effects, and operator error. Although every effort is made to eliminate their causes and to plan for potential problems in the design and synthesis steps, it is not always successful and the eventual outcome of a synthesis is not always predictable. One must never assume that the final product is the expected one until that has been proven to be the case. To do otherwise may seriously jeopardize the outcome of the research. Used and performed properly, the evaluation stage is where the fruits of the synthesis are scrutinized and the decision is made to use the peptide as intended, submit it to further purification, or resynthesize it and possibly change elements of the design or synthesis protocols.


1995 ◽  
pp. 539-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg B. Fields ◽  
Ruth H. Angeletti ◽  
Lynda F. Bonewald ◽  
William T. Moore ◽  
Alan J. Smith ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document