Role of Simulation-Based Training in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Colorectal Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (03) ◽  
pp. 136-143
Author(s):  
Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo ◽  
Rodrigo Oliva Perez ◽  
Sidney Klajner

AbstractProperly performing minimally invasive colorectal procedures requires specific skills. With a focus on patient safety, the training of surgeons on patients is only accepted under exceptionally controlled, expensive, and challenging conditions. Moreover, many new techniques in colorectal surgery have been developed. Therefore, undertaking minimally invasive colorectal surgery in modern times requires specific psychomotor skills that trainee surgeons must gather in less time. In addition, there are not enough proctors with sufficient expertise for such an expressive number of new different techniques likes transanal and robotic procedures.Studies that have demonstrated an improvement in minimally invasive surgery skills to the actual operating room in general surgery and a stepwise approach to surgical simulation with a combination of various training methods appears to be useful in colorectal surgery training programs. However, the scientific evidence on the transfer of skills specifically for colorectal surgery is extremely scarce and very variable. Thus, the evaluation of the results remains quite difficult. In this review, we present the best available evidence on the types of training based on simulation, their characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, and finally the results available on their adoption. Nevertheless, scientific evidence about the benefit of simulation training in minimally invasive colorectal surgery is limited and there is a need to build more robust evidence.

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (03) ◽  
pp. 186-193
Author(s):  
Assad Zahid ◽  
Danilo Miskovic

AbstractTeaching an established surgeon in a novel technique by a colleague who has acquired a level of expertise is often referred to as “proctoring” or “precepting.” Surgical preceptorships can be defined as supervised teaching programs, whereby individual or groups of surgeons (proctors) experienced in a certain technique support a colleague who wants to adopt this technique (sometimes referred to as “delegates” or “preceptees”). Preceptorship programs really focus on a specific technique, technology, or skill which is required to broaden, complement, or transform an established surgeon's practice.Within colorectal surgery, in the past 30 years, there is been an evolution of interventional options including open, laparoscopic, robotic, and endoscopic procedures. With each new emerging technology and technique, safe and effective uptake by established surgeons is best been attained by a period of proctorship by an experienced colleague. Formalizing this has been facilitated largely through industry support. There, however, remains a considerable chasm when it comes to standardization, quality control, and jurisprudence.This article aims to describe the requirements for a contemporary proctorship program, to examine instruments of quality control, and how to improve effectiveness.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa M. Jimenez-Rodriguez ◽  
Felipe Quezada-Diaz ◽  
Madeline Tchack ◽  
Emmanouil Pappou ◽  
Iris H. Wei ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 2286-2294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Mujukian ◽  
Adam Truong ◽  
Hai Tran ◽  
Rita Shane ◽  
Phillip Fleshner ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 3262-3269
Author(s):  
M. Inama ◽  
G. Spolverato ◽  
H. Impellizzeri ◽  
M. Bacchion ◽  
M. Creciun ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Marano ◽  
Maria Carmela Giuffrida ◽  
Giorgio Giraudo ◽  
Luca Pellegrino ◽  
Felice Borghi

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 221-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Whealon ◽  
Alessio Vinci ◽  
Alessio Pigazzi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document