Enhancement of the Fibula Free Flap by Alveolar Distraction for Dental Implant Restoration: Report of a Case

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 087-094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Levin ◽  
Lee Carrasco ◽  
Amin Kazemi ◽  
Ara Chalian
Author(s):  
Dan Tran ◽  
Janina Deeb ◽  
Pandora Wojnarwsky ◽  
George Deeb

This report describes the use of a temporary dental implant to secure a radiographic fiducial marker and patient tracking tag to an edentulous mandible for dynamically guided implant placement into a fibula microvascular free flap. A small diameter dental implant was placed into the anterior mandible to secure a radiographic fiducial marker followed by a patient tag. The patient tag allowed for tracking of the patient’s mandible during placement of endosseous dental implants. Four endosseous dental implants were successfully placed into the edentulous fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction. Dynamic navigation using a small diameter implant to secure radiographic fiducial markers and patient tags provides a novel technique to place implants into an edentulous microvascular free flap with minimal incision and reflection of soft tissue.


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramin Carbiner ◽  
Waseem Jerjes ◽  
Kaveh Shakib ◽  
Peter V Giannoudis ◽  
Colin Hopper

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Philippine Callies ◽  
Timothée Gellée ◽  
Mickael Samama

Introduction: Alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) is one of vertical bone augmentation technique used to restore the vertical bone discrepancy between the transplanted graft and the residual alveolar bone after mandibular reconstruction. The aim of this article is to present the clinical outcomes of ADO applied to reconstructed mandible for three patients. Observation: Three patients underwent alveolar distraction osteogenesis procedure on mandibula reconstructed by fibula free flap (n = 2) or iliac crest free flap (n = 1). The mean bone height increase was 11 mm. 16 implants have been placed in all patients, with a success rate of 100% and a mean follow-up of 25 months. Two complications occurred without compromising the final outcome of the procedure: one fracture of the basal bone and one bony interference, both during activation phase. Commentaries: ADO can be performed on reconstructed mandible with free flap to restore alveolar height. An acceptable implant-to-crown ratio allows an optimal supported implant prosthesis. The particular antecedent of our patients can lead to uncommon complications such as basal bone fracture, but doesn't seem to compromise implant placement with good success rate. Conclusions: ADO performed on reconstructed mandible allows appropriate dental implant rehabilitation, achieving good esthetics and occlusal outcomes.


Microsurgery ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 358-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Joris Hage ◽  
Henri A. H. Winters ◽  
Jesse Van Lieshout
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document