Tolerance, Effectiveness, and Acceptability of Sulfate-Free Electrolyte Lavage Solution for Colon Cleansing Before Colonoscopy

Endoscopy ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (07) ◽  
pp. 555-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-M. Raymond ◽  
R. Beyssac ◽  
E. Capdenat ◽  
C.-H. Pineau ◽  
A. Kerjean ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 909-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim S. Ker

In an attempt to improve patient tolerance for colon cleaning, a reduced-volume regimen with a 2-liter electrolyte lavage solution plus 20 mg of oral bisacodyl was compared with the standard 4-liter lavage for efficacy and safety. Three hundred patients were prospectively randomized into two study groups. One group of 150 patients was given four tablets of 5 mg bisacodyl at 12:00 PM the day before their colonoscopy, followed by 2 liters of electrolyte lavage by mouth at 6:00 PM the evening before their colonoscopy. Another group of 150 patients were given 4 liters of electrolyte lavage at 6:00 PM the evening before their colonoscopy. All patients were on a clear liquid diet the day before their colonoscopy. No enema was given in either groups. The bowel cleanliness was accessed by one colonoscopist. One registered nurse accessed the comfort of patient. In the 2-liter group, only one (0.6%) patient could not finish the laxative. Colon cleanliness was 80 per cent to 100 per cent, with an average of 95.9 per cent. In the 4-liter group, 11 (7.3%) patients could not finish the laxative preparation. Colon cleanliness was 78 per cent to 100 per cent, with an average of 95.3 per cent. The study that found the 2-liter electrolyte lavage solution with four tablets of bisacodyl can achieve equally good results in bowel preparation and favorable acceptance by patients compared with the 4-liter lavage.


2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiko Mine ◽  
Kazuo Morikage ◽  
Seiko Oku ◽  
Takashi Yoshikawa ◽  
Isao Shimizu ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendell K. Clarkston ◽  
Tony N. Tsen ◽  
David F. Dies ◽  
C.Lynn Schratz ◽  
Surender K. Vaswani ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. e43 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P Gerard ◽  
Diane B Foster ◽  
Manfred W Raiser ◽  
John L Holden ◽  
Theodore G Karrison

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Dae Bum Kim ◽  
Kang-Moon Lee ◽  
Sung-Goo Kang ◽  
Sung Hoon Jung

Background. Previous studies have suggested that relatively poor bowel preparation in the proximal colon, compared to that in the distal colon, could decrease the usefulness of colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine whether the “first defecation time” after polyethylene glycol (PEG) administration affects the cleansing quality in the proximal colon. Methods. A total of 425 individuals who were scheduled to undergo a screening colonoscopy were enrolled prospectively at the healthcare center of St. Vincent’s Hospital, Suwon, Korea, between April 2015 and March 2016. Bowel cleansing was performed using 4 L of PEG. Surveys were conducted to obtain information regarding the “first defecation time.” Endoscopists assessed the quality of bowel preparation in each bowel segment. Results. We investigated 425 consecutive eligible cases. The mean “first defecation time” after PEG administration was 54.35 min. The quality of bowel preparation was poorer in the proximal colon than that in the distal colon. The adequate (excellent, good) and inadequate (fair, poor) proximal colon preparation groups comprised 360 (84.7%) and 65 (15.3%) patients, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that female gender (P=0.029), small waist circumference (P=0.027), and the long “first defecation time” (P=0.034) were independently associated with inadequate bowel preparation in the proximal colon. Conclusion. Our data document that the “first defecation time,” female gender, and a small waist circumference affect the quality of preparation in the proximal colon. Inadequate preparation in the proximal colon was more common in females. Patients with these factors undergoing colonoscopy should be monitored carefully.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document