Ultrasound evaluation of superficial soft-tissue masses in paediatric patients – are we able to distinguish malignant tumours from benign masses?

Author(s):  
M Piskunowicz ◽  
W Kosiak ◽  
D Swieton ◽  
T Stachowicz-Stencel
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. 135-155
Author(s):  
Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez ◽  
Costantino Errani ◽  
Radhesh Lalam ◽  
Violeta Vasilevska Nikodinovska ◽  
Stefano Fanti ◽  
...  

AbstractThe vast majority of soft tissue masses are benign. Benign lesions such as superficial lipomas and ganglia are by far the most common soft tissue masses and can be readily identified and excluded on ultrasound (US). US is an ideal triaging tool for superficial soft tissue masses. Compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), High-resolution US is inexpensive, readily available, well tolerated, and safe. It also allows the radiologist to interact with the patient as a clinician. In this review, we describe and illustrate the lesions with typical (diagnostic) US features. When the appearances of the lesion are not typical as expected for a benign lesion, lesions are deep or large, or malignancy is suspected clinically, MRI and biopsy are needed. The management of suspicious soft tissue tumors has to be carefully planned by a multidisciplinary team involving specialized surgeons and pathologists at a tumor center.


2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. S106
Author(s):  
Nurul Adliah Gazali ◽  
Denise Si Min Lau ◽  
Rafidah Abu Bakar ◽  
Chandra Mohan P

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1110) ◽  
pp. 20191037
Author(s):  
Michael Khoo ◽  
Ian Pressney ◽  
Craig Gerrand ◽  
Asif Saifuddin

Objective: To determine whether the location of a small, indeterminate soft tissue mass within the subcutaneous compartment is related to its histological grade. Methods: All Sarcoma Service referrals over a 12 month period of small (<3 cm) superficial soft tissue masses, indeterminate by MRI evaluation which subsequently underwent primary excision biopsy were included. Lesions were categorised by their anatomical location in the subcutaneous compartment. Histopathological diagnoses were categorized according to 12 WHO 2013. χ2 statistical analysis was performed to determine the relationship between lesion depth and histological grade. Results: The study included 43 patients, mean age 42 years (range 15–71 years). Within the subcutaneous compartment, 16 lesions were categorized as superficial, 9 lesions central and 18 lesions deep, of which 9 were non-neoplastic, 29 benign, 1 intermediate-grade and 4 malignant. Location in the deep aspect of the subcutaneous compartment was associated with a higher risk of intermediate or malignant histology (p = 0.02). Conclusion: The location of a small, indeterminate soft tissue mass within the subcutaneous compartment may be an indicator of histological aggressiveness. Lesions in the deep subcutaneous compartment are more likely to be intermediate-grade/malignant lesions. Therefore, if considering excision biopsy as definitive treatment, a wider margin may be appropriate. Advances in knowledge: Small, indeterminate soft tissue masses can be aggressive and the anatomical depth within the subcutaneous tissue may be a potential indicator of histological aggressiveness.


Radiographics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1289-1304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia F. Blacksin ◽  
Doo-Hoe Ha ◽  
Meera Hameed ◽  
Seena Aisner

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
J.Abdul Gafoor ◽  
B. Suresh ◽  
M. Padmalatha ◽  
P. Kavitha ◽  
Bandaru Mahesh Yadav

Evaluation of soft tissue tumours has undergone a dramatic change with the advent of ultrasonography(USG),magnetic resonance(MR)imaging and computed tomography (CT). Patients are referred for imaging to evaluate a soft tissue lesions in the trunk or extremities.These lesions range from non-neoplastic conditions to benign and malignant tumours. The primary goal for the imaging referral is to confirm the presence of a mass and to assess its extent. And also the study is an attempt to define the role of different imaging modalities in the evaluation of patients with soft tissue tumours in correlation with histopathology.


Radiographics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 509-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca D. Beaman ◽  
Mark J. Kransdorf ◽  
Tricia R. Andrews ◽  
Mark D. Murphey ◽  
Lynn K. Arcara ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Smith ◽  
John Salanitri ◽  
David Lisle

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 030006052098136
Author(s):  
Joyce J.L.H McRae ◽  
Asra Hashmi ◽  
Andrei Radulescu ◽  
Cody S. Carter ◽  
Faraz A. Khan

Lipoblastomas and liposarcomas are rare causes of soft tissue masses in paediatric patients. In this retrospective clinical case series we identified 11 patients from our paediatric database (10 with a lipoblastoma and one with a liposarcoma) who had attended our hospital between 1998 and 2019. The median age of patients with lipoblastoma was 29 months. All lipoblastoma cases were managed with surgical excision and histological examination. The 18-year old patient with liposarcoma presented with a metastatic and unresectable tumour that was unresponsive to chemotherapy and radiation. Our experience demonstrates the importance of differentiating the type of soft tissue mass in children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document