scholarly journals Goserelin for Ovarian Protection during Breast-Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy

2015 ◽  
Vol 372 (10) ◽  
pp. 923-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halle C.F. Moore ◽  
Joseph M. Unger ◽  
Kelly-Anne Phillips ◽  
Frances Boyle ◽  
Erika Hitre ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ander Urruticoechea ◽  
Monica Arnedos ◽  
Geraldine Walsh ◽  
Mitch Dowsett ◽  
Ian E. Smith

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1094-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. F. Leonard ◽  
Douglas Adamson ◽  
Gianfilippo Bertelli ◽  
Michelle McLinden ◽  
Nan Haiying ◽  
...  

1094 Background: The OPTION trial in premenopausal women tested the ovarian protection effect of goserelin (G) given randomly before and during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods: Using standard chemotherapy, women were randomised in 2 strata, under 40 yrs and over 40 yrs at diagnosis. 227 patients were recruited by end December 2009. 173 met the criteria for 1 year follow-up for this analysis; 140 patients of these had provided adequate data on menstrual bleeding; 87 patients were aged under 40 and 53 patients were aged over 40 at the time of chemotherapy. Cessation of menstruation during chemotherapy was defined as at least two consecutive cycles with no menstrual bleeding since the previous cycle and no return of menstrual bleeding prior to the final cycle of chemotherapy. Of those patients who had ceased periods during chemotherapy, those with no further menstrual bleeding at 12 months follow up were deemed to be menopausal. Patients were randomised to receive G or no G at start of chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was recovery of menses at 12 months from start of chemotherapy. AMH was measured in 117 women pre-treatment, and at 1 year after starting chemotherapy. Results: There were no differences in pretreatment AMH between control and goserelin-treated groups, thus further analyses were performed on all women grouped together. AMH was lower following chemotherapy (0.40±0.65 vs 1.38±1.82ng/ml; mean±SD; P<0.001)). Pre-treatment AMH was a significant predictor of post-treatment amenorrhoea (P=0.001). By multivariate logistic regression analysis with age and AMH, age remained significant (P=0.003) whereas AMH did not (P=0.07). Grouping pre-treatment and post-chemo AMH into quartiles showed that AMH became undetectable in 94% of women with lowest pre-treatment AMH vs 46.2% of women with the highest pretreatment AMH. We have previously demonstrated in a small cohort that pretreatment AMH can predict long-term (5 year) ovarian activity in women with breast cancer. Conclusions: The present data confirm the value of pretreatment AMH in assessing the likelihood of ongoing ovarian activity after chemotherapy for early breast cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 392-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halle C. F. Moore ◽  
Joseph M. Unger ◽  
Kelly-Anne Phillips ◽  
Frances Boyle ◽  
Erika Hitre ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4278-4285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhong ◽  
Yan Lin ◽  
Xinqi Cheng ◽  
Xin Huang ◽  
Yidong Zhou ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 590-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Leonard ◽  
D. Adamson ◽  
R. Anderson ◽  
R. Ballinger ◽  
G. Bertelli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document