Performance Evaluation of a Reinforced Masonry Model and an Unreinforced Masonry Model Using a Shake Table Testing Facility

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 04017121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shermi Chellappa ◽  
R. N. Dubey
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarmad Shakeel ◽  
Bianca Bucciero ◽  
Alessia Campiche ◽  
Tatiana Pali ◽  
Luigi Fiorino ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Giaretton ◽  
Dmytro Dizhur ◽  
Jason Ingham

Past seismic events, such as the 1994 Northridge earthquake, the 2001 Nis-qually earthquake, and the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes, have repeatedly served as reminders of the hazards posed by unreinforced masonry parapets. Observed failure modes have included several cases where adopted retrofit techniques were inadequate to effectively secure parapets during earthquake-induced shaking. In response, this paper investigates, by means of shake table testing, the dynamic behavior of nine clay-brick masonry parapets with commonly used bracing systems and alternative securing techniques, such as post-tensioning and combined braces and vertical strong-backs. Seismic capacity was improved 6 to 8 times compared to the as-built postcracked condition. The addition of vertical strong-backs further improved the performance of braced parapets, with capacity increased 12 times compared to as-built parapets. Parapet construction and retrofit procedures are presented, followed by a discussion of the developed failure modes as well as the response of the retrofitted parapets.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Bucciero ◽  
Sarmad Shakeel ◽  
Tatiana Pali ◽  
Luigi Fiorino ◽  
Raffaele Landolfo

Author(s):  
Marco Miglietta ◽  
Nicolò Damiani ◽  
Gabriele Guerrini ◽  
Francesco Graziotti

AbstractTwo full-scale building specimens were tested on the shake-table at the EUCENTRE Foundation laboratories in Pavia (Italy), to assess the effectiveness of an innovative timber retrofit solution, within a comprehensive research campaign on the seismic vulnerability of existing Dutch unreinforced masonry structures. The buildings represented the end-unit of a two-storey terraced house typical of the North-Eastern Netherlands, a region affected by induced seismicity over the last few decades. This building typology is particularly vulnerable to earthquake excitation due to lack of seismic details and irregular distribution of large openings in masonry walls. Both specimens were built with the same geometry. Their structural system consisted of cavity walls, with interior load-bearing calcium-silicate leaf and exterior clay veneer, and included a first-floor reinforced concrete slab, a second-floor timber framing, and a roof timber structure supported by masonry gables. A timber retrofit was designed and installed inside the second specimen, providing an innovative sustainable, light-weight, reversible, and cost-effective technique, which could be extensively applied to actual buildings. Timber frames were connected to the interior surface of the masonry walls and completed by oriented strands boards nailed to them. The second-floor timber diaphragm was stiffened and strengthened by a layer of oriented-strand boards, nailed to the existing joists and to additional blocking elements through the existing planks. These interventions resulted also in improved wall-to-diaphragm connections with the inner leaf at both floors, while steel ties were added between the cavity-wall leaves. The application of the retrofit system favored a global response of the building with increased lateral capacities of the masonry walls. This paper describes in detail the bare and retrofitted specimens, compares the experimental results obtained through similar incremental dynamic shake-table test protocols up to near-collapse conditions, and identifies damage states and damage limits associated with displacements and deformations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 129-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali A. Rad ◽  
Gregory A. MacRae ◽  
Nikoo K. Hazaveh ◽  
Quincy Ma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document