Modeling the Removal of Arsenic by Iron Oxide Coated Sand

2010 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Rozell
2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.S. Thirunavukkarasu ◽  
T. Viraraghavan ◽  
K.S. Subramanian

Abstract Arsenic, a common toxic element is mainly transported in the environment by water. Arsenic in drinking water is of major concern to many of the water utilities in the world. Numerous studies have examined the removal of arsenic from drinking water through treatment processes such as coagulation-precipitation, reverse osmosis and ion exchange. The focus of research has now shifted to solve the problems using suitable adsorbents to achieve low level As in drinking water for communities with high raw water arsenic concentration. The determination of arsenic species is also essential for a better understanding and prediction of the toxic and carcinogenic nature of the species present in natural water systems. It is generally known that As(III) is more toxic than As(V) and inorganic arsenicals are more toxic than organic derivatives. The objective of this study was to study the arsenic adsorption behaviour on iron oxide-coated sand (IOCS) and ferrihydrite (FH). Batch studies were conducted using these adsorbents with natural water containing 325 μg/L arsenic, and the removal of approximately 90% was obtained. The adsorption capacity of the IOCS and FH used in this study for arsenic was estimated as 18.3 and 285 μg/g, respectively. The experimental data fitted well with the well-known isotherms, namely, Freundlich, Langmuir and BET, indicating a favourable adsorption by these adsorbents. Speciation studies were also conducted with natural water containing arsenic. Particulate and soluble arsenic in water were determined, and As(III) in the sample was determined by passing the sample containing arsenic through anion exchange resin (Dowex 1X8-100; acetate form) packed in the column. Speciation studies with natural water showed that the particulate and soluble arsenic contributed 11.4 and 88.6% of the total arsenic present in the natural water, respectively. In the case of soluble arsenic, As(III) and As(V) were 47.3 and 52.7%, respectively.


2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Chandra Vaishya ◽  
Sudhir Kumar Gupta
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 579 ◽  
pp. 776-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dengjun Wang ◽  
Chongyang Shen ◽  
Yan Jin ◽  
Chunming Su ◽  
Lingyang Chu ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashmi R. Devi ◽  
Iohborlang M. Umlong ◽  
Bodhaditya Das ◽  
Kusum Borah ◽  
Ashim J. Thakur ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document