Coastal Flood Damage Estimator: An Alternative to FEMA’s HAZUS Platform

2016 ◽  
Vol 142 (6) ◽  
pp. 04016016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Karamouz ◽  
Mohammad Fereshtehpour ◽  
Forough Ahmadvand ◽  
Zahra Zahmatkesh
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo U. Parodi ◽  
Alessio Giardino ◽  
Ap van Dongeren ◽  
Stuart G. Pearson ◽  
Jeremy D. Bricker ◽  
...  

Abstract. Considering the likely increase of coastal flooding in Small Island Developing States (SIDS), coastal managers at the local and global level have been developing initiatives aimed at implementing Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) measures and adapting to climate change. Developing science-based adaptation policies requires accurate coastal flood risk (CFR) assessments, which are often subject to the scarcity of sufficiently accurate input data for insular states. We analysed the impact of uncertain inputs on coastal flood damage estimates, considering: (i) significant wave height, (ii) storm surge level and (iii) sea level rise (SLR) contributions to extreme sea levels, as well as the error-driven uncertainty in (iv) bathymetric and (v) topographic datasets, (vi) damage models and (vii) socioeconomic changes. The methodology was tested through a sensitivity analysis using an ensemble of hydrodynamic models (XBeach and SFINCS) coupled with an impact model (Delft-FIAT) for a case study at the islands of São Tomé and Príncipe. Model results indicate that for the current time horizon, depth damage functions (DDF) and digital elevation model (DEM) dominate the overall damage estimation uncertainty. We find that, when introducing climate and socioeconomic uncertainties to the analysis, SLR projections become the most relevant input for the year 2100 (followed by DEM and DDF). In general, the scarcity of reliable input data leads to considerable predictive error in CFR assessments in SIDS. The findings of this research can help to prioritise the allocation of limited resources towards the acquisitions of the most relevant input data for reliable impact estimation.


Author(s):  
Mohammad Baradaranshoraka ◽  
Jean-Paul Pinelli ◽  
Kurt Gurley ◽  
Mingwei Zhao ◽  
Xinlai Peng ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Rohmer ◽  
Daniel Lincke ◽  
Jochen Hinckel ◽  
Goneri Le Cozannet ◽  
Erwin Lambert

<p>Global scale assessment of coastal flood damage and adaptation costs under 21st century sea-level rise are associated with a wide range of uncertainties including those in future projections of socioeconomic development (SSP scenarios), of greenhouse gas emissions (RCP scenarios), and of sea-level rise (SLR). These uncertainties also include structural uncertainties related to the modeling of extreme sea levels, vulnerability functions, and the translation of flooding-induced damage to costs. This raises the following questions: what is the relative importance of each source of uncertainty in the final global-scale results? Which sources of uncertainty need to be considered? What uncertainties are of negligible influence? Hence, getting better insights in the role played by these uncertainties allows to ease their communication and to structure the message on future coastal impacts and induced losses. Using the integrated DIVA Model (see e.g. Hinkel et al., 2014, PNAS), we extensively explore the impact of these uncertainties in a global manner, i.e. by considering a large number (~3,000) of scenario combinations and by analyzing the associated results using a regression-based machine learning technique (i.e. regression decision trees). On this basis, we show the decreasing roles, over time, of the uncertainties in the extremes’ modeling together with the increasing roles of SSP and of RCP after 2030 and 2080 for the damage and adaptation costs respectively. This means that mitigation of climate change helps to reduce uncertainty of adaptation costs, and choosing a particular SSP reduces the uncertainty on the expected damages. In addition, the tree structure of the machine learning technique allows an in-depth analysis of the interactions of the different uncertain factors. These results are discussed depending on the SLR data selected for the analysis, i.e. before and after the recently released IPCC SROCC report on September 2019.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (9) ◽  
pp. 3292-3297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen Hinkel ◽  
Daniel Lincke ◽  
Athanasios T. Vafeidis ◽  
Mahé Perrette ◽  
Robert James Nicholls ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sebastian ◽  
D. J. Bader ◽  
C. M. Nederhoff ◽  
T. W. B. Leijnse ◽  
J. D. Bricker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document