Team Integration and Owner Satisfaction: Comparing Integrated Project Delivery with Construction Management at Risk in Health Care Projects

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 05018014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiyong Choi ◽  
Sungmin Yun ◽  
Fernanda Leite ◽  
Stephen P. Mulva
2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Faris Elghaish ◽  
Sepehr Abrishami ◽  
M. Reza Hosseini ◽  
Soliman Abu-Samra

PurposeThe amalgamation of integrated project delivery (IPD) and building information modelling (BIM) is highly recommended for successful project delivery. However, IPD lacks an accurate cost estimation methodology at the “front-end” of projects, when little project information is available. This study aims to tackle this issue, through presenting analytical aspects, theoretical grounds and practical steps/procedures for integrating target value design (TVD), activity-based costing (ABC) and Monte Carlo simulation into the IPD cost structure, within a BIM-enabled platform.Design/methodology/approachA critical review was conducted to study the status of cost estimation within IPD, as well as exploring methods and tools that can enhance the cost estimation process for IPD. Thereafter, a framework is developed to present the proposed methodology of cost estimation for IPD throughout its entire stages. A case project is used to validate the practicality of the developed solution through comparing the profit-at-risk percentage for each party, using both traditional cost estimation and the proposed solution.FindingsAfter applying the proposed IPD's cost estimation framework, on a real-life case project, the findings demonstrated significant deviations in the profit-at-risk value for various work packages of the project (approximately 100% of the finishing package and 22% of openings package). By providing a precise allocation of overhead costs, the solution can be used in real-life projects to change the entire IPD cost structure and ensure a fair sharing of risk–rewards among the involved parties in IPD projects.Practical implicationsUsing the proposed methodology of cost estimation for IPD can enhance the relationship among IPD's core team members; all revealed financial deficiencies will be considered (i.e. compensation structure, profit pooling), hence enhancing the IPD performance.Originality/valueThis paper presents a comprehensive solution for integrating BIM and IPD in terms of cost estimation, offering three main contributions: (1) an innovate approach to utilise five-dimensional (5D) BIM capabilities with Monte Carlo simulation, hence providing reliable cost estimating during the conceptual TVD stage; (2) mathematical models that are developed through integrating ABC into the detailed 5D BIM to determine the three IPD's cost structure limbs; and (3) a novel mechanism of managing cost saving (rewards) through distinguishing between saved resources from organisation level, to daily task level, to increase trust among parties.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-90
Author(s):  
Roman Tracz ◽  
Marzena Lendo-Siwicka

The process of integrated project delivery in construction shifts towards analyzing and controlling of communications. The transition to the modern construction management methods is closely connected with network organizational structure. The network structure is a new model for intellectual and productive resources exchange, which allows the enterprises to minimize time and expenses. The risks that time and charges will increase grow as the number of participants in the investment process in the construction rises. In the integrated project delivery, the optimality of the decisions is mainly dependent on the effectiveness of the negotiation process, which in turn depends on the organizational structure. The article presents three main types of network organizational structure that can be applied during the integrated delivery of the project: focal, dynamic and multifocal. It provides the method of determining the minimum number of “substitute members” to manage the network in applying the multifocal type of network organizational structure. Provided that the number of participants in a project is less than five, the manager may work on his own or with one alternate. When the number of project participant’s increases, the number of “substitute members” to manage the network grows in accordance with the accepted condition.


2018 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiliang Ma ◽  
Dongdong Zhang ◽  
Jiulin Li

Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Jowett ◽  
Malak Al Hattab ◽  
Mohamad Kassem

Building information modelling (BIM) tools and workflows, new procurements methods, and emerging management practices are being adopted on projects to overcome collaboration barriers and improve project performance within the architecture, engineering, construction, and operation (AECO) sector. Academic literature and industry reports recommend the use of collaborative procurement methods such as design and build (DB) procurement and integrated project delivery (IPD) when adopting BIM workflows. However, to date there are little operationalization and empirical evidence of the value realization potential when using BIM in conjunction to these procurement methods. This chapter draws upon five case studies of BIM-based DB projects to analyze and quantify the potential of value realization using clash detection as a use value. The results reveal potential hurdles inhibiting BIM from reaching its full potential. Accordingly, recommended changes to the current processes are suggested to facilitate BIM in enhancing value on DB projects.


Author(s):  
James Harty ◽  
Richard Laing

Building information modelling (BIM) is not only an authoring tool for architects and engineers, but also for all stakeholders in the building programme procurement process. Analysis tools like code checking of building regulations and environmental simulations that can report on heating loads, daylighting and carbon use will push the adoption of intelligent modelling faster and further than previously thought. The benefits for clients should not be underestimated either and some are already reaping them where project certainty is to the fore. However, the professional language that architects and engineers espouse is a latent force that can run counter to fostering collaboration. An emerging professional, the Architectural Technologist, can bridge that divide and adopt the adjunct role of manager in the integrated project delivery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document