Reinforced Masonry Building Seismic Response Models for ASCE/SEI-41

2018 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 04017175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ezzeldin ◽  
Wael El-Dakhakhni ◽  
Lydell Wiebe
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Masonry Building ◽  
Response Models ◽  
Reinforced Masonry

Seismic Response of Full‐Scale Five‐Story Reinforced‐Masonry Building

1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 925-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Seible ◽  
M. J. N. Priestley ◽  
G. R. Kingsley ◽  
A. G. Kürkchübasche
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Masonry Building ◽  
Reinforced Masonry

The Whittier Narrows, California Earthquake of October 1, 1987—Masonry Building Performance Survey

1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. C. Hart ◽  
J. Kariotis ◽  
J. L. Noland
Keyword(s):  
Earthquake Response ◽  
Building Performance ◽  
Masonry Building ◽  
Masonry Buildings ◽  
Reinforced Masonry ◽  
Survey Results

The observed earthquake response of unreinforced and reinforced masonry buildings during the October 1 and 4, 1987 Whittier Narrows Earthquakes was documented in a comprehensive building survey. This paper describes the extent of the survey, the type of data collected and a preliminary summary of some survey results.

Numerical Investigations on the Seismic Response of Masonry Building Aggregates

2010 ◽  
Vol 133-134 ◽  
pp. 715-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Senaldi ◽  
Guido Magenes ◽  
Andrea Penna
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Nonlinear Dynamic ◽  
Masonry Building ◽  
Structural Units ◽  
Numerical Investigations ◽  
Dynamic Analyses ◽  
Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses ◽  
Building Aggregates

The work focuses on the analysis of the seismic response of masonry building aggregates for a better understanding of the vulnerability of single structural units and of their behaviour within the aggregates. Idealized representative models are developed based on the typical characteristics of the row conglomeration typology. The seismic response of the models is evaluated and discussed by means of nonlinear dynamic analyses.

Strengthening of Historic Masonry Structures with Composite Materials

2017 ◽  
pp. 613-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Corradi ◽  
Adelaja Israel Osofero ◽  
Antonio Borri ◽  
Giulio Castori
Keyword(s):  
Composite Materials ◽  
Stone Masonry ◽  
Masonry Walls ◽  
Masonry Building ◽  
Masonry Buildings ◽  
Historic Masonry ◽  
Reinforced Masonry ◽  
Total Lack ◽  
Recent Earthquakes ◽  
Masonry Vaults

Existing un-reinforced masonry buildings made of vaults, columns and brick and multi-leaf stone masonry walls, many of which have historical and cultural importance, constitute a significant portion of construction heritage in Europe and rest of the world. Recent earthquakes in southern Europe have shown the vulnerability of un-reinforced masonry constructions due to masonry almost total lack of tensile resistance. Composite materials offer promising retrofitting possibilities for masonry buildings and present several well-known advantages over existing conventional techniques. The aim of this work is to analyze the effectiveness of seismic-upgrading methods both on un-damaged (preventive reinforcement) and damaged (repair) masonry building. After a brief description of mechanical and physical properties of composite materials, three different applications have been addressed: in-plane reinforcement of masonry walls, extrados and intrados reinforcement of masonry vaults/arches and masonry column confinement with composite materials.

Elaborate Failure Model and Seismic Response Analysis for Multi-Story Masonry Building with R. C. Frames on Ground Floor

2013 ◽  
Vol 753-755 ◽  
pp. 504-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duo Zhi Wang ◽  
Jun Wu Dai ◽  
Chen Xiao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Horizontal Displacement ◽  
Shear Wall ◽  
Seismic Damage ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Masonry Building ◽  
Failure Model ◽  
Seismic Response Analysis ◽  
Ground Floor ◽  
Floor Structure

Framed-Ground Floor Structure for short which has serious seismic damage and high collapsed rate, is the unreasonable structure system. The experiences is 1. The shear wall can be increased to improve stiffness of weak layer. And designer should try to arrange the walls equably. 2. In order to avoid stiffness mutation, stiffness ratio between ground frame and transition layer can be adjusted. 3. Collapse resistant design of Framed-Ground Floor Structures should be emphasized. Then seismic response analysis is conducted by ANSYS. And the seismic response is little, and strength damage or stable damage do not occur for the little acceleration peak. Along with the increasing acceleration peak, The bigger horizontal displacement leads to damage of Framed-Ground Floor Structures. Moreover, the damage is in advance as the increasing acceleration peak.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document