Neutron dosimetry in solid water phantom

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Luis Benites-Rengifo ◽  
Hector Rene Vega-Carrillo
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caio Fernando Teixeira Portela ◽  
Thêssa Cristina Alonso ◽  
Arnado Prata Mourão

The precision in the dose values delivered in irradiation processes is essential for the efficiency and quality control of these processes. Radiochromic films can be used to record doses and the calibration of these films must be performed so that they can be used as dosimeters. The planning and control of the radiation released in a process allows to adjust the desired dose in the irradiated object. The photons in the primary beam interact with the matter of the object and the beam energy is attenuated due to these interactions. The attenuation depends on the characteristics of the beam and the composition of the irradiated matter. When a beam of photons propagates on an object, it tends to deposit more energy close to the surface and after reaching the maximum dose value, it decreases the dose values with depth. The films used in this work are of the Gafchromic External Beam Therapy (EBT) type, insensitive to visible light and can be prepared in places where sunlight and artificial light exists. Like many other dosimeters, which follow certain protocols, radiochromic films can provide an absolute dose measurement. Radiochromic films are characterized by their linearity, reproducibility, uniformity, sensitivity, and stability after irradiation. For the realization of the experiments, a part of the film to be irradiated was removed designated as background (BG). BG represents a piece of radiochromic film that will not change and reflects changes in film absorption in relation to environmental conditions such as temperature, visible light and scanning light, for example and that must be handled from it way that the film radiated. In this work, irradiations of a solid water phantom were performed using a source of cesium-137 with the deposition of a maximum absorbed dose value of 2.0 Gy. The phantom was placed 1,0 m far from the source collimator. Radiochromic films were placed inside the phantom to obtain the depth variation dose profile and axial dose profiles measured at 1.0 cm depth in the phantom. The dose variation profile in depth allowed to verify that the maximum dose value happened at a depth between 10 and 13 mm, very close to the surface due to the beam energy range (keV). The axial profiles presented a flatness of about 9.4 cm with a total field of 12 cm in diameter. 


Author(s):  
Tomoe Hagio ◽  
Qin Li ◽  
Bahaa Ghammraoui ◽  
Robert J. Jennings ◽  
Benjamin P. Berman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
J. H. Lee ◽  
L. T. Chang ◽  
A. C. Shiau ◽  
C. W. Chen ◽  
Y. J. Liao ◽  
...  

A standard protocol of dosimetric measurements is used by the organizations responsible for verifying that the doses delivered in radiation-therapy institutions are within authorized limits. This study evaluated a self-designed simple auditing phantom for use in verifying the dose of radiation therapy; the phantom design, dose audit system, and clinical tests are described. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used as postal dosimeters, and mailable phantoms were produced for use in postal audits. Correction factors are important for converting TLD readout values from phantoms into the absorbed dose in water. The phantom scatter correction factor was used to quantify the difference in the scattered dose between a solid water phantom and homemade phantoms; its value ranged from 1.084 to 1.031. The energy-dependence correction factor was used to compare the TLD readout of the unit dose irradiated by audit beam energies with60Co in the solid water phantom; its value was 0.99 to 1.01. The setup-condition factor was used to correct for differences in dose-output calibration conditions. Clinical tests of the device calibrating the dose output revealed that the dose deviation was within 3%. Therefore, our homemade phantoms and dosimetric system can be applied for accurately verifying the doses applied in radiation-therapy institutions.


1991 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sou-Tung Chiu-Tsao ◽  
Lowell L. Anderson

1982 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 436-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Constantinou ◽  
F. H. Attix ◽  
Bhudatt R. Paliwal

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 045017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Trichter ◽  
Christopher G Soares ◽  
Marco Zaider ◽  
J Keith DeWyngaert ◽  
Larry A DeWerd ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
MartinJ Butson ◽  
Tsang Cheung ◽  
PeterK.N Yu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document