Effects of wing shape, aspect ratio and deviation angle on aerodynamic performance of flapping wings in hover

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 111901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aamer Shahzad ◽  
Fang-Bao Tian ◽  
John Young ◽  
Joseph C. S. Lai
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 036001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjiang Fu ◽  
Xiaohui Liu ◽  
Wei Shyy ◽  
Huihe Qiu

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett R. Aiello ◽  
Usama Bin Sikandar ◽  
Hajime Minoguchi ◽  
Katalina C. Kimball ◽  
Chris A. Hamilton ◽  
...  

A wide diversity of wing shapes has evolved, but how is aerodynamic strategy coupled to morphological variation? Here we examine how wing shape has evolved across a phylogenetic split between hawkmoths (Sphingidae) and wild silkmoths (Saturniidae), which have divergent life histories, but agile flight behaviors. Combined with kinematics of exemplar species, we find that these two diverse sister families have evolved two distinct strategies for agile flight. Each group has evolved distinct wing shapes in phylogenetic PCA-space. The notoriously agile hawkmoths have not evolved wing shapes typical of maneuverability, but rather ones that reduce power. Instead their kinematics favor maneuverability, primarily through higher wingbeat frequency. In contrast, silkmoths evolved maneuverable wing shapes and use kinematics that reduce power. Therefore, multiple strategies have evolved to achieve similar aerodynamic performance. We suggest flapping wings provide flexible aerodynamics through kinematics and might release morphological constraints, enabling the diversity of wing shapes across extant flyers.


Author(s):  
Francis Hauris ◽  
Onur Bilgen

This paper investigates the dynamic aeroelastic behavior of strain actuated flapping wings with various geometries and boundary conditions. A fluid-structure interaction model of a plate-like flapping wing is developed. Assuming a chord Reynolds number of 100,000, the wing is harmonically actuated while varying parameters such as aspect ratio and wing root clamped percentage. Characteristic metrics for the dynamic motion, natural frequency, lift and drag are developed. These results are compared with purely structural behavior to understand the aeroelastic effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document