This paper aims to analyze the thermal performance of four different heat
transfer fluids in a hot oil system located in a paraffin hydrotreatment and
fractionation plant of a petroleum refinery. The software Petro-SIM?
(KBC-Yokogawa) was employed to elaborate steady-state simulations intended
to compare the heat transfer fluid currently used (eutectic of biphenyl and
diphenyl oxide) and three fluids proposed as substitutes: paraffin oil
(namely n-C13+) produced in the very industrial unit, a nanofluid of
eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl oxide and copper at a 6 % volume fraction,
and a CuO/polydimethylsiloxane nanofluid at a 6 % volume fraction. The
results showed that n-C13+ was the only heat transfer fluid that could
replace the eutectic diphenyl oxide/ biphenyl in the system under analysis
since it absorbed the heat duty of 13.79 Gcal/ h, which exceeded the thermal
energy of 10.57 Gcal/ h absorbed by the heat transfer fluid currently used
at the same operating parameters. The Cu/ eutectic of biphenyl and diphenyl
oxide and CuO/polydimethylsiloxane nanofluids presented lower heat duty
than the energy needed for the operation of the hot oil system, which was
8.31 Gcal/h and 8.51 Gcal/h, respectively.