scholarly journals John Bell, relativistic causality, and the arrow of time

Physics Today ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
Reinhold A. Bertlmann
Physics Today ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
Nathan Argaman

Author(s):  
Donald C. Williams

This chapter is about the arrow or direction of time against the backdrop of the pure manifold theory. It is accepted that the fact that time has a direction ought to be explained. It is proposed that the arrow of time is grounded in deeper facts about the four-dimensional nature of each object in the manifold and in facts about the overall four-dimensional shape of the universe. Towards the end of the chapter the possibility of time travel is discussed. It is argued that time travel is metaphysically possible and that there is a reasonable and intelligible sense in which a time traveler can and cannot change the past, according to the pure manifold theory.


Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Nathan Argaman

Quantum physics is surprising in many ways. One surprise is the threat to locality implied by Bell’s Theorem. Another surprise is the capacity of quantum computation, which poses a threat to the complexity-theoretic Church-Turing thesis. In both cases, the surprise may be due to taking for granted a strict arrow-of-time assumption whose applicability may be limited to the classical domain. This possibility has been noted repeatedly in the context of Bell’s Theorem. The argument concerning quantum computation is described here. Further development of models which violate this strong arrow-of-time assumption, replacing it by a weaker arrow which is yet to be identified, is called for.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-67
Author(s):  
Ghenadie Mardari

The phenomenon of quantum erasure exposed a remarkable ambiguity in the interpretation of quantum entanglement. On the one hand, the data is compatible with the possibility of arrow-of-time violations. On the other hand, it is also possible that temporal non-locality is an artifact of post-selection. Twenty years later, this problem can be solved with a quantum monogamy experiment, in which four entangled quanta are measured in a delayed-choice arrangement. If Bell violations can be recovered from a “monogamous” quantum system, then the arrow of time is obeyed at the quantum level.


1991 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. L155-L160 ◽  
Author(s):  
D S Goldwirth ◽  
T Piran
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 243-251
Author(s):  
VLADIMIR G. IVANCEVIC ◽  
TIJANA T. IVANCEVIC

The unique Hamiltonian description of neuro- and psycho-dynamics at the macroscopic, classical, inter-neuronal level of brain's neural networks, and microscopic, quantum, intra-neuronal level of brain's microtubules, is presented in the form of an open Liouville equation. This implies the arrow of time in both neuro- and psycho-dynamic processes and proves the existence of the formal neuro-biological space-time self-similarity. This proof implies the existence of a unique neurodynamical law, which acts on different scales of brain's functioning.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
David Garofalo

While the basic laws of physics seem time-reversal invariant, our understanding of the apparent irreversibility of the macroscopic world is well grounded in the notion of entropy. Because astrophysics deals with the largest structures in the Universe, one expects evidence there for the most pronounced entropic arrow of time. However, in recent theoretical astrophysics work it appears possible to identify constructs with time-reversal symmetry, which is puzzling in the large-scale realm especially because it involves the engines of powerful outflows in active galactic nuclei which deal with macroscopic constituents such as accretion disks, magnetic fields, and black holes. Nonetheless, the underlying theoretical structure from which this accreting black hole framework emerges displays a time-symmetric harmonic behavior, a feature reminiscent of basic and simple laws of physics. While we may expect such behavior for classical black holes due to their simplicity, manifestations of such symmetry on the scale of galaxies, instead, surprise. In fact, we identify a parallel between the astrophysical tug-of-war between accretion disks and jets in this model and the time symmetry-breaking of a simple overdamped harmonic oscillator. The validity of these theoretical ideas in combination with this unexpected parallel suggests that black holes are more influential in astrophysics than currently recognized and that black hole astrophysics is a more fundamental discipline.


2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (18) ◽  
pp. 2793-2812 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERASMO RECAMI ◽  
FLAVIO FONTANA ◽  
ROBERTO GARAVAGLIA

Some experiments, performed at Berkeley, Cologne, Florence, Vienna, Orsay and Rennes led to the claim that something seems to travel with a group velocity larger than the speed c of light in vacuum. Various other experimental results seem to point in the same direction: For instance, localized wavelet-type solutions of Maxwell equations have been found, both theoretically and experimentally, that travel with Superluminal speed. Even muonic and electronic neutrinos — it has been proposed — might be "tachyons," since their square mass appears to be negative. With regard to the first-mentioned experiments, it was very recently claimed by Guenter Nimtz that those results with evanescent waves or "tunneling photons" — implying Superluminal signal and impulse transmission — violate Einstein causality. In this note, on the contrary, we want to stress that all such results do not place relativistic causality in jeopardy, even if they refer to actual tachyonic motions: In fact, special relativity can cope even with Superluminal objects and waves. For instance, it is possible (at least in microphysics) to solve also the known causal paradoxes, devised for "faster than light" motion, even if this is not widely recognized. Here we show, in detail and rigorously, how to solve the oldest causal paradox, originally proposed by Tolman, which is the kernel of many further tachyon paradoxes. The key to the solution is a careful application of tachyon mechanics, as it unambiguously follows from special relativity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document