The Dominance of Static Depth Cues over Motion Parallax in the Perception of Surface Orientation

Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 32-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Cornilleau-Pérès ◽  
E Marin ◽  
J Droulez
Keyword(s):  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Surface Orientation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Relative Depth ◽  
Rigidity Constraint ◽  
Visual Scenes ◽  
Winner Take All

Under polar projection (the natural projection for visual scenes) motion parallax is a powerful cue specifying relative depth. For small-field stimuli, it is ambiguous in the sense that a concave surface can be perceived as convex and deforming. By contrast, concavity/convexity of wide-field surfaces is unambiguously perceived. This led us to hypothesise a critical role of the 3-D rigidity constraint for large visual scenes in motion (Dijkstra et al, 1995 Vision Research35 453 – 462). To examine this hypothesis, we exposed subjects to planes inclined in space, and asked them to report the tilt (direction of inclination). Depth was specified either by motion parallax (MP, the surface oscillated around a frontoparallel axis) or by static perspective cues (SP, orthogonal square grids drawn on the plane). At ECVP95, we had reported a predominance of SP over MP when the tilts specified by these two cues ( tMP and tSP respectively) differed (1995 Perception24 Supplement, 137). Since these results were obtained for fast movements (oscillation frequency for MP: 3.6 Hz), we extended our investigation to a slower frequency (0.5 Hz) which is more likely to be involved during natural head-movements. We found that: (i) errors in tilt reports were larger for MP than for SP, and decreased with increasing field-size; (ii) in the case of conflict ( tMP= tSP±90°), the reported tilt was either tMP or tSP, rather than an average of these two values; (iii) in this case, tilt was most often reported according to SP, rather than to MP cues; this effect occurred even when the accuracies for the two individual cues were similar. Therefore, in a conflict situation between MP and SP, surface orientation is reported according to a winner-take-all rule, which is largely in favour of static grid-cues. Hence, even for wide-field movements, the image contrast distribution can lead the visual system to prefer an unrigid, rather than rigid, solution to the 3-D shape-from-motion problem.

scholarly journals Stabilizing responses to sideslip disturbances in Drosophila melanogaster are modulated by the density of moving elements on the ground

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Ruiz ◽  
Jamie C. Theobald
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Flight Control ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Flight Stabilization ◽  
Regional Basis ◽  
Motion Detection System ◽  
Self Motion

Stabilizing responses to sideslip disturbances are a critical part of the flight control system in flies. While strongly mediated by mechanoreception, much of the final response results from the wide-field motion detection system associated with vision. In order to be effective, these responses must match the disturbance they are aimed to correct. To do this, flies must estimate the velocity of the disturbance, although it is not known how they accomplish this task when presented with natural images or dot fields. The recent finding, that motion parallax in dot fields can modulate stabilizing responses only if perceived below the fly, raises the question of whether other image statistics are also processed differently between eye regions. One such parameter is the density of elements moving in translational optic flow. Depending on the habitat, there might be strong differences in the density of elements providing information about self-motion above and below the fly, which in turn could act as selective pressures tuning the visual system to process this parameter on a regional basis. By presenting laterally moving dot fields of different densities we found that, in Drosophila melanogaster , the amplitude of the stabilizing response is significantly affected by the number of elements in the field of view. Flies countersteer strongly within a relatively low and narrow range of element densities. But this effect is exclusive to the ventral region of the eye, and dorsal stimuli elicit an unaltered and stereotypical response regardless of the density of elements in the flow. This highlights local specialization of the eye and suggests the lower region may play a more critical role in translational flight stabilization.

scholarly journals Projection Screen with Wide-FOV and Motion Parallax Display for Teleoperation of Construction Machinery

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 604-609
Author(s):  
Daisuke Kondo ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Field Of View ◽  
Depth Information ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Viewing Angle ◽  
Cooperative Research ◽  
Construction Machinery ◽  
Cooperative Research Center ◽  
Projection Screen ◽  
Wide Field Of View

The teleoperation of construction machinery has been introduced to mines and disaster sites. However, the work efficiency of teleoperations is lower than that of onboard operations owing to limitations in the viewing angle and insufficient depth information. To solve these problems and realize effective teleoperations, the Komatsu MIRAI Construction Equipment Cooperative Research Center is developing the next-generation teleoperation cockpit. In this study, we develop a display for teleoperations with a wide field-of-view, a portable projection screen, and a system that reproduces motion parallax, which is suitable for depth perception in the operating range of construction machinery.

scholarly journals Apparent distortion of the frontoparallel plane from wide-field motion parallax

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-324
Author(s):  
V. Cornilleau-Peres ◽  
L.C. Tai ◽  
L. -F. Cheong
Keyword(s):  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Frontoparallel Plane

Apparent Depth with Retinal Image Motion of Expansion and Contraction Yoked to Head Movement

Perception ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 937-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanao Yajima ◽  
Hiroyasu Ujike ◽  
Keiji Uchikawa
Keyword(s):  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Ccd Camera ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Image Motion ◽  
Apparent Depth ◽  
Motion Cues ◽  
Relative Expansion ◽  
Retinal Image Motion ◽  
Self Motion

The two main questions addressed in this study were (a) what effect does yoking the relative expansion and contraction (EC) of retinal images to forward and backward head movements have on the resultant magnitude and stability of perceived depth, and (b) how does this relative EC image motion interact with the depth cues of motion parallax? Relative EC image motion was produced by moving a small CCD camera toward and away from the stimulus, two random-dot surfaces separated in depth, in synchrony with the observers' forward and backward head movements. Observers viewed the stimuli monocularly, on a helmet-mounted display, while moving their heads at various velocities, including zero velocity. The results showed that (a) the magnitude of perceived depth was smaller with smaller head velocities (<10 cm s−1), including the zero-head-velocity condition, than with a larger velocity (10 cm s−1), and (b) perceived depth, when motion parallax and the EC image motion cues were simultaneously presented, is equal to the greater of the two possible perceived depths produced from either of these two cues alone. The results suggested the role of nonvisual information of self-motion on perceiving depth.

scholarly journals Self-motion trajectories can facilitate orientation-based figure-ground segregation

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 912-926
Author(s):  
Arkadeb Dutta ◽  
Tidhar Lev-Ari ◽  
Ouriel Barzilay ◽  
Rotem Mairon ◽  
Alon Wolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Neural Response ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Essential Property ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Tyto Alba ◽  
Dominant Orientation ◽  
Barn Owls ◽  
Detection Of Objects

Segregation of objects from the background is a basic and essential property of the visual system. We studied the neural detection of objects defined by orientation difference from background in barn owls ( Tyto alba). We presented wide-field displays of densely packed stripes with a dominant orientation. Visual objects were created by orienting a circular patch differently from the background. In head-fixed conditions, neurons in both tecto- and thalamofugal visual pathways (optic tectum and visual Wulst) were weakly responsive to these objects in their receptive fields. However, notably, in freely viewing conditions, barn owls occasionally perform peculiar side-to-side head motions (peering) when scanning the environment. In the second part of the study we thus recorded the neural response from head-fixed owls while the visual displays replicated the peering conditions; i.e., the displays (objects and backgrounds) were shifted along trajectories that induced a retinal motion identical to sampled peering motions during viewing of a static object. These conditions induced dramatic neural responses to the objects, in the very same neurons that where unresponsive to the objects in static displays. By reverting to circular motions of the display, we show that the pattern of the neural response is mostly shaped by the orientation of the background relative to motion and not the orientation of the object. Thus our findings provide evidence that peering and/or other self-motions can facilitate orientation-based figure-ground segregation through interaction with inhibition from the surround. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Animals frequently move their sensory organs and thereby create motion cues that can enhance object segregation from background. We address a special example of such active sensing, in barn owls. When scanning the environment, barn owls occasionally perform small-amplitude side-to-side head movements called peering. We show that the visual outcome of such peering movements elicit neural detection of objects that are rotated from the dominant orientation of the background scene and which are otherwise mostly undetected. These results suggest a novel role for self-motions in sensing objects that break the regular orientation of elements in the scene.

Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception

Perception ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Rogers ◽  
Maureen Graham
Keyword(s):  
Depth Perception ◽  
Close Agreement ◽  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Matching Task ◽  
Relative Depth ◽  
Relative Movement ◽  
Random Dot Stereograms ◽  
Random Dot Patterns ◽  
Dimensional Surface

The perspective transformations of the retinal image, produced by either the movement of an observer or the movement of objects in the visual world, were found to produce a reliable, consistent, and unambiguous impression of relative depth in the absence of all other cues to depth and distance. The stimulus displays consisted of computer-generated random-dot patterns that could be transformed by each movement of the observer or the display oscilloscope to simulate the relative movement information produced by a three-dimensional surface. Using a stereoscopic matching task, the second experiment showed that the perceived depth from parallax transformations is in close agreement with the degree of relative image displacement, as well as producing a compelling impression of three-dimensionality not unlike that found with random-dot stereograms.

scholarly journals Psychophysical evidence for auditory motion parallax

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (16) ◽  
pp. 4264-4269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daria Genzel ◽  
Michael Schutte ◽  
W. Owen Brimijoin ◽  
Paul R. MacNeilage ◽  
Lutz Wiegrebe
Keyword(s):  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Relative Depth ◽  
Auditory Motion ◽  
Motion Platform ◽  
Sound Sources ◽  
Binaural Cues ◽  
Binaural Processing ◽  
Perceptual Strategy ◽  
Observer Motion ◽  
Self Motion

Distance is important: From an ecological perspective, knowledge about the distance to either prey or predator is vital. However, the distance of an unknown sound source is particularly difficult to assess, especially in anechoic environments. In vision, changes in perspective resulting from observer motion produce a reliable, consistent, and unambiguous impression of depth known as motion parallax. Here we demonstrate with formal psychophysics that humans can exploit auditory motion parallax, i.e., the change in the dynamic binaural cues elicited by self-motion, to assess the relative depths of two sound sources. Our data show that sensitivity to relative depth is best when subjects move actively; performance deteriorates when subjects are moved by a motion platform or when the sound sources themselves move. This is true even though the dynamic binaural cues elicited by these three types of motion are identical. Our data demonstrate a perceptual strategy to segregate intermittent sound sources in depth and highlight the tight interaction between self-motion and binaural processing that allows assessment of the spatial layout of complex acoustic scenes.

scholarly journals Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax

2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (17) ◽  
pp. 2636-2644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark F. Bradshaw ◽  
Paul B. Hibbard ◽  
Andrew D. Parton ◽  
David Rose ◽  
Keith Langley
Keyword(s):  
Binocular Disparity ◽  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Modulation Frequency ◽  
Surface Orientation

scholarly journals Ldb1 and Rnf12-dependent regulation of Lhx2 controls the relative balance between neurogenesis and gliogenesis in retina

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy de Melo ◽  
Anand Venkataraman ◽  
Brian S. Clark ◽  
Cristina Zibetti ◽  
Seth Blackshaw
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Muller Glia ◽  
Müller Glia ◽  
Retinal Neurons ◽  
Bhlh Factors

AbstractPrecise control of the relative ratio of retinal neurons and glia generated during development is essential for visual function. We show that Lhx2, which encodes a LIM-homeodomain transcription factor essential for specification and differentiation of retinal Müller glia, also plays a critical role in the development of retinal neurons. Overexpression of Lhx2, and its transcriptional coactivator Ldb1, triggers cell cycle exit and inhibits both Notch signaling and retinal gliogenesis. Lhx2/Ldb1 overexpression also induced the formation of wide-field amacrine cells (wfACs). In contrast Rnf12, which encodes a negative regulator of LDB1, is necessary for the initiation of retinal gliogenesis. We also show that LHX2 protein binds upstream of multiple neurogenic bHLH factors including Ascl1 and Neurog2, which are necessary for suppression of gliogenesis and wfAC formation respectively, and activates their expression. Finally, we demonstrate that the relative level of the LHX2-LDB1 complex in the retina decreases in tandem with the onset of gliogenesis. These findings show that control of Lhx2 function by Ldb1 and Rnf12 acts as a molecular mechanism underpinning the coordinated differentiation of neurons and Müller glia in postnatal retina.Significance StatementThe molecular mechanisms that control the ratio neurons and glia that are generated by neuronal progenitors remain unclear. Here we show that Lhx2, a transcription factor essential for retinal gliogenesis, also controls development of retinal neurons. The Lhx2 coactivator Ldb1 promotes Lhx2-dependent neurogenesis, while the Lhx2 corepressor Rnf12 is necessary and sufficient for retinal gliogenesis. Furthermore, Lhx2 directly regulates expression of bHLH factors that promote neural development, which are necessary for Lhx2-dependent neurogenesis. Finally, we show that levels of the LHX2-LDB1 complex, which activates transcription, drop as gliogenesis begins. Dynamic regulation of Lhx2 activity by Ldb1 and Rnf12 thus controls the relative levels of retinal neurogenesis and gliogenesis, and may have similar functions elsewhere in the developing nervous system.

scholarly journals Depth percept from motion parallax by backward/forward head movements

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1180-1180
Author(s):  
M. Ishii ◽  
M. Fujii
Keyword(s):  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Depth Percept
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document