scholarly journals Case management at Warringal Private Hospital: Challenges of development, implementation and evaluation

1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Yarmo ◽  
Melissa McDonald

Case management has the potential to improve the quality of care for patients,streamline efficiencies within organisations, and ultimately lower health careexpenditure. This article explores why Warringal Private Hospital embraced theconcept and how the chosen model of case management was developed. It describesthe implementation and evaluation of the model and how it was received, accepted,and applied by the various stakeholders. The cardiac and orthopaedic units will becited as case studies in order to emphasise some of the challenges encountered in thisprocess as well as the successful outcomes. It should be noted, however, that each unitwithin the hospital is unique and, although the principles of case management havebeen applied throughout the hospital, the development, implementation andevaluation has been specific to each unit.

Diabetes Care ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 59-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Korn

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 408-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Phillips ◽  
M. Han ◽  
S. M. Petterson ◽  
L. A. Makaroff ◽  
W. R. Liaw

2014 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 424-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan P. Miller ◽  
Agbessi Amouzou ◽  
Mengistu Tafesse ◽  
Elizabeth Hazel ◽  
Hailemariam Legesse ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humphrey Wanzira ◽  
Daniel Tumwine ◽  
Patrick Bukoma ◽  
Allan Musiime ◽  
Juliet Biculu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Approximately 50 percent of the population in Uganda seeks health care from private facilities but there is limited data on the quality of care for malaria in these facilities. This study aimed to document the quality of malaria case management in private health facilities in nine districts in the Mid-Western region of Uganda, an area of moderate malaria transmission.Methods This was a cross sectional study in which purposive sampling was used to select fifteen private-for-profit facilities from each district. An interviewer-administered questionnaire that contained both quantitative and open-ended questions was used. Information was collected on availability of treatment aides, knowledge on malaria, malaria case management, laboratory practices, malaria drugs stock and data management. We determined the proportion of health workers that adequately provided malaria case management according to national standards.Results Of the 135 health facilities staff interviewed, 61.48% (52.91 - 69.40) had access to malaria treatment protocols while 48.89% (40.19 - 57.63) received malaria training. The majority of facilities, 98.52% (94.75 - 99.82) had malaria diagnostic services and the most commonly available anti-malarial drug was artemether-lumefantrine, 85.19% (78 - 91), followed by Quinine, 74.81% (67 - 82) and intravenous artesunate, 72.59% (64 – 80). Only 14.07% (8.69 – 21.10) responded adequately to the acceptable cascade of malaria case management practice. Specifically, 33.33% (25.46 - 41.96) responded correctly to management of a patient with a fever, 40.00% (31.67 - 48.79) responded correctly to the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria, whereas 85.19% (78.05 - 90.71) responded correctly to severe malaria treatment. Only 28.83% submitted monthly reports, where malaria data was recorded, to the national database.Conclusion This study revealed sub-optimal malaria case management practices at private health facilities with approximately 14% of health care workers demonstrating correct malaria case management cascade practices. This was due to limited access to malaria case management protocols and guidelines, lack of adequate staff training and supportive supervision, stock-outs of essential anti-malarial commodities and inadequate malaria related community level sensitization. The national malaria control programme could consider this information to inform specific areas of focus for strengthening malaria case management in the private health facilities.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humphrey Wanzira ◽  
Daniel Tumwine ◽  
Patrick Bukoma ◽  
Allan Musiime ◽  
Juliet Biculu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Approximately 50 percent of the population in Uganda seeks health care from private facilities but there is limited data on the quality of care for malaria in these facilities. This study aimed to document the quality of malaria case management in private health facilities innine districts in the Mid-Western region of Uganda, an area of moderate malaria transmission. Methods: This was a cross sectional study in which purposive sampling was used to select fifteen private-for-profit facilities from each district. An interviewer-administered questionnaire that contained both quantitative and open-ended questions was used. Information was collected on availability of treatment aides, knowledge on malaria, malaria case management, laboratory practices, malaria drugs stock and data management. We determined the proportion of health workers that adequately provided malaria case management according to national standards. Results: Of the 135 health facilities staff interviewed, 61.48% (52.91 - 69.40) had access to malaria treatment protocols while 48.89% (40.19 - 57.63) received malaria training. The majority of facilities, 98.52% (94.75 - 99.82) had malaria diagnostic services and the most commonly available anti-malarial drug was artemether-lumefantrine, 85.19% (78 - 91), followed by Quinine, 74.81% (67 - 82) and intravenous artesunate, 72.59% (64 – 80). Only 14.07% (8.69 – 21.10) responded adequately to the acceptable cascade of malaria case management practice. Specifically, 33.33% (25.46 - 41.96) responded correctly to management of a patient with a fever, 40.00% (31.67 - 48.79) responded correctly to the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria, whereas 85.19% (78.05 - 90.71) responded correctly to severe malaria treatment. Only 28.83% submitted monthly reports, where malaria data was recorded, to the national database. Conclusion: This study revealed sub-optimal malaria case management practices at private health facilities with approximately 14% of health care workers demonstrating correct malaria case management cascade practices. To strengthen the quality of malaria case management, it is recommended that the NMCD distributes up to date guidelines and tools, coupled with training; continuous mentorship and integrated supportive supervision; provision of adequate stock of essential anti-malarials and RDTs; reinforcing communication and behavior change approach and increasing support for data management at private health facilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document