APPLICATIONS OF MODERN AND ANCIENT GEOLOGICAL ANALOGUES IN CHARACTERISATION OF FLUVIAL AND FLUVIAL-LACUSTRINE DELTAIC RESERVOIRS IN THE COOPER BASIN

2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 393 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.C. Lang ◽  
J. Kassan ◽  
J.M. Benson ◽  
C.A. Grasso ◽  
L.C. Avenell

Reservoir characterisation in fluvial and fluvial- lacustrine delta successions is enhanced by the use of appropriate modern and ancient analogues to understand subsurface reservoir architecture and to help build appropriately scaled reservoir models. Two case studies of reservoir characterisation in the Cooper Basin are used to illustrate the value of analogues. Firstly the Late Permian Toolachee Formation crevasse splay reservoirs of the Cooper Basin, southwest Queensland are outlined, and analogues from the Ob River in Western Siberia illustrate the relative scale of crevasse splay deposits within avulsion belts in a cool-temperate peat-forming environment. The South Blackwater coal mine in the Permian Bowen Basin is used as an analogue to quantify the 3D geometry and reservoir architecture of crevasse splays and to highlight subsurface reservoir heterogeneity.Secondly, the Early Permian Epsilon Formation shallow water lacustrine delta reservoirs are outlined, and analogues from the extant geometry of the distributary channels and relict mouth bar deposits from the fluvial dominated Neales Delta in Lake Eyre are used to interpret flow rate decline trends and probable reservoir architecture. The subsurface Tertiary lacustrine deltaic complex of the Sirikit Field from the Phitsanulok Basin, central Thailand, is selected as an ancient analogue for the multistorey reservoirs developed within amalgamated mouth bar complexes intersected in the lower Epsilon Formation.

2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 115 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Nakanishi ◽  
S.C. Lang

Exploration and development in the Cooper-Eromanga Basin have been predominantly focussed on structural traps. However, the future for exploration and field development lies in exploration for stratigraphic traps. Using advanced visualisation techniques on open file 3D seismic survey data from the Moorari and Woolkina fields in the Patchawarra Trough, Cooper Basin, we have sought to characterise the variety of possible stratigraphic traps in the Permian Patchawarra, Epsilon and Toolachee Formations and also the basal Jurassic Poolowanna Formation. The key to the analysis lies in a genetic-stratigraphic framework using sequence stratigraphy concepts as applied to non-marine basins.Five different types of possible stratigraphic traps are illustrated from the Moorari 3D survey: Isolated fluvial channels in a transgressive systems tract of the lower Patchawarra Formation.Fluvial sand bodies in low accommodation intervals in a lowstand systems tract of the upper Patchawarra Formation.Highstand lacustrine delta of the Epsilon Formation below the regional sequence boundary at the base of the Toolachee Formation.Isolated fluvial channels in the transgressive systems tract of the Toolachee Formation.Crevasse splay channels and crevasse splay delta complex of the transgressive systems tract of the Poolowanna Formation.For each trap type, three dimensional distributions of the possible reservoir and seal rocks are presented and the ranking of stratigraphic trap opportunities is discussed.


1987 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 203-219
Author(s):  
Henrik Olsen

Investigations of sedimentary sequences in a marginal part of Homelen Basin (M. Devonian, W Norway) have resulted in the interpretation of gradually established fluvial and fluviodeltaic subsystems adjacent to a major river system. A succession of 8 coarsening upward (CU) sequences (4.5---19 m thick) wad studied. Three sequence types are recognized: sequence type A, B and C. The lower part of all sequence types is composed of silty lacustrine flood basin deposits. The upper part of all sequence types is composed of sandy low sinuosity fluvial channel deposits. The middle part of the three sequence types is composed of sandy sheet splay deposits (sequence type A), crevasse splay deposits (sequence type B) and deltaic mouth bar deposits (sequence type C). The genesis og the different types of CU sequences is explained by repeated lateral establishments of fluvial and fluvio-deltaic subsystems adjacent to a major humid fan-like river system. The establishment of the subsystems occurred in four phases: I) Initial fine-grained overbank flows into flood badin lakes. II) Sheet splay flows and/or crevasse splay flows. III) Establishment of distributary channels and associated deltaic mouth bars. IV) Progradation of channel/mouth bar couplets and filling up of the flood basin lakes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 662-682
Author(s):  
Henrik Vosgerau ◽  
Pierpaolo Guarnieri ◽  
Rikke Weibel ◽  
Michael Larsen ◽  
Brian Bell ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The Rosebank hydrocarbon discovery in 2004 proved that intra-lava sandstones form attractive reservoirs in the Faroe–Shetland Basin and the new volcanic play triggered the need for suitable analogues to describe and assess sedimentology, reservoir architecture, compartmentalization, and connectivity of intra-lava siliciclastic units. The onshore Kangerlussuaq Basin in East Greenland offers the opportunity to study Paleogene intra-lava siliciclastic sandstones and their interaction with lavas, on the scale of the Rosebank Field. The focus of this study is a siliciclastic-dominated intra-lava unit, 4–10 m thick, exposed in almost vertical cliff sections over distances of several kilometers. The unit reflects a short return to siliciclastic deposition following initiation of volcanic activity and extrusion of the first lava flows in the area. Deposition took place as shoreface and delta progradation in a marine-influenced, shallow embayment. Lateral variations in sedimentary facies distribution and geometry are prominent and were largely governed by an interplay of base-level variations and autocyclic processes, the surface roughness and type of substratum on which deposition took place, and differential block movements before and during deposition. Presence of local topographic barriers are of key importance and influenced the lava–sediment interaction and the resulting 3D-geometry of lava flows and sediment bodies. In addition, compartmentalization of the intra-lava sandstone unit is observed and is controlled by the offset across normal faults, intersecting dikes, and to a lesser extent by invasive and eroding lavas. A depositional model is suggested that incorporates the detailed sedimentological and 3D photogrammetric observations and presents a possible explanation for the contrasting architecture of the intra-lava unit observed in three areas located a few kilometers apart. The model embraces the complex interplay between siliciclastic and volcanic settings and reveals important aspects to consider when recoverable volumes of hydrocarbons are estimated in intra-volcanic subsurface reservoirs in volcanic rifted margins with poor seismic imaging of the relatively thin intra-lava reservoirs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document