Misting of Tomato Plants Improves Leaf Water Status but not Leaf Growth

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Stirzaker ◽  
P. T. Hayman ◽  
B. G. Sutton

Field and laboratory experiments were carried out to determine whether modification of the aerial environment in a hot climate would improve the leaf growth rate and ultimately the yield of well- irrigated processing tomatoes, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. UC82B. In the field, the transpiration rate was modified by frequent applications of a fine mist. Misting reduced the diurnal fall in leaf water potential by up to 0.5 MPa, but had no effect on weekly vegetative growth or fruit yield, compared to a control treatment which was not misted but had accurately managed drip irrigation. To investigate these processes further, we studied the relationship between leaf water status and leaf growth in the laboratory using equipment in which a pot is placed inside a pressure chamber, with the leaves enclosed in a cuvette. Immediately following a misting event, both the hydrostatic pressure of the leaf xylem and the leaf expansion rate increased. The increase in leaf expansion rate was sustained for about 10 min and then fell below the pre-misted rate so that the net effect of a misting event on leaf expansion was small or nil. When an elevated leaf water status was sustained by pressurising the soil for over an hour, there was only a transient increase in leaf growth, and leaf growth stopped after the pressure was removed. Both in the laboratory and field, the overall leaf or vegetative growth was not sensitive to rapid fluctuations in leaf water status. The implication is that, if sufficient attention is paid to managing the root zone of crops, the more expensive and less efficient modification of the shoot environment is unnecessary.


2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 941 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. Passioura ◽  
Rana Munns

We subjected wheat and barley plants to rapid environmental changes, and monitored leaf elongation rates for several hours thereafter. Changes in light, humidity or salinity caused sudden rises (if the leaf water status rose) or falls (if the leaf water status fell) in leaf elongation rate, followed by a recovery phase that lasted 20–60 min. After a step change in light or humidity, the growing leaf eventually resumed its original elongation rate, although the shoot water status, as monitored by leaf thickness, differed markedly. Salinity, on the other hand, produced a persistent change in leaf elongation rate, which settled down to a lower steady rate after the transient response was over. To determine whether the sudden changes in leaf elongation rate were due to changes in leaf water relations, we kept shoots fully hydrated through the environmental changes by automatically pressurising the roots to maintain leaf xylem on the point of bleeding. This annulled the environmental effects on leaf water status, and thereby largely removed the changes in leaf elongation rate. The only exception was at the dark:light transition, when the leaf elongation rate of pressurised plants rose sharply (in contrast to that of unpressurised plants, which fell), then underwent damped oscillations before settling at about its initial value. The sudden excursions of leaf growth in unpressurised plants accompanying the environmental changes were undoubtedly due to changes in leaf water status. The subsequent, generally complete, return of the leaf elongation rate to its initial value within an hour, despite the persistent change in leaf water status, suggests that a control system is operating at a time scale of tens of minutes that eventually overrides, partially or completely, the rapid effects of changes in leaf water status.



2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fulai Liu ◽  
Christian Richardt Jensen ◽  
Mathias Neumann Andersen

Both hydraulic and chemical signals are probably important in regulating leaf growth and stomatal conductance of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) under drought stress. However, until now they have not been investigated concomitantly in this species. To explore this, a pot experiment in a temperature-regulated greenhouse was conducted, in which plants were subjected to progressive drought during early reproductive stages. Biophysical parameters, viz. relative leaf expansion rate, stomatal conductance, leaf turgor, leaf [ABA], xylem pH and xylem [ABA] were followed in control and stressed plants. Drought stress decreased relative leaf expansion rate, stomatal conductance and leaf turgor, whereas it increased leaf [ABA], xylem pH and xylem [ABA]. As soil dried, significant differences between water treatments for relative leaf expansion rate, stomatal conductance, leaf turgor, leaf [ABA], xylem pH and xylem [ABA] were observed at 14, 9, 14, 14, 14 and 9 d after imposition of stress, respectively. The relationships of relative values for relative leaf expansion rate, stomatal conductance, leaf turgor, leaf [ABA] and xylem pH to the fraction of transpirable soil water (FTSW) were well described by linear-plateau functions that allowed calculation of the soil-water thresholds at which processes in stressed plants began to diverge from well-watered controls. The soil-water threshold for stomatal conductance (0.64) was significantly higher than that for relative leaf expansion rate (0.29), xylem pH (0.28), leaf [ABA] (0.27) and leaf turgor (0.25). Relative xylem [ABA] increased, first linearly (when FTSW > 0.5) and then exponentially (when FTSW < 0.5) with decreasing FTSW. Relative stomatal conductance decreased exponentially with increasing relative xylem [ABA] (r2=0.98). Decreased stomatal conductance coincided with an increase in xylem [ABA] and occurred before any significant change of leaf turgor could be detected, indicating that chemical signals (seemingly root-originated ABA) control stomatal behaviour at moderate soil water deficits. Relative relative leaf expansion rate was linearly correlated with relative leaf turgor (r2=0.93), relative xylem pH (r2=0.97) and relative leaf [ABA] (r2=0.98), implying that both hydraulic and chemical signals were probably involved in regulation of leaf expansion at severe soil water deficits.



1907 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 564-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. O. Sadras ◽  
F. J. Villalobos ◽  
E. Fereres


1990 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 149 ◽  
Author(s):  
JB Passioura ◽  
A Gardner

The relative leaf expansion rate (RLER) of plants in drying soil eventually falls behind that of well watered plants. There is increasing evidence that the roots sense the drying of the soil and send signals to the leaves that control their behaviour independently of any effects of the soil's drying on the water status of the leaves. The roots could be sensing the falling availability of phosphorus, the falling water status, or the hardening of the soil. This paper explores these possibilities and concludes that, in the soil used, the roots were sensing both the water status and the strength of the soil but not the availability of phosphorus. Some of the experiments were done with a high evaporative demand on the leaves to see if the RLER would then be sensitive to the leaves' water status; it was not.





2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Taheri-Garavand ◽  
Abdolhossein Rezaei Nejad ◽  
Dimitrios Fanourakis ◽  
Soodabeh Fatahi ◽  
Masoumeh Ahmadi Majd


1979 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. Jones

SummaryThe potential offered for plant breeding programmes by visual scoring techniques for plant water status was investigated in rice and spring wheat. It was found that differing plant morphology could seriously bias visual estimates of leaf water potential, particularly in spring wheat. In spite of this problem, it was found that at least for rice, this type of approach may have potential in future breeding programmes where an estimate of leaf water status is required, such as those for drought tolerance, so long as a high intensity of selection is not necessary.



2015 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 96-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenxing Cao ◽  
Quan Wang ◽  
Chaolei Zheng




Plants ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Bianco ◽  
Giuseppe Avellone


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document