Photoinhibitory printing on leaves, visualised by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging and confocal microscopy, is due to diminished fluorescence from grana

1999 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Osmond ◽  
Owen Schwartz ◽  
Brian Gunning

By analogy with the starch printing technique, it was hypothesised that photoinhibition could be used to print images on leaves that would be invisible to the eye, but easily revealed by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. We first illustrate the process of chlorophyll fluorescence printing on leaves of the shade plant, Cissus rhombifolia, using photographs of artefacts from starch printing experiments in the laboratory of Molisch. We then use portraits of current leaders in chlorophyll fluorescence research to demonstrate the stability of these images in living tissues. Text printing from microfilm of Ewart’s pioneering studies in photoinhibition shows the resolution of the method with the fixed-focus, portable, imaging system used here. The stability of images, as well as quenching analysis of images and of leaves, suggests that localised photoinactivation, rather than sustained photoprotection, is responsible for the detail displayed by fluorescence printing. Electron micrograph positives of stained thylakoids can be printed to create an illusion of what is imagined to be the source of chlorophyll fluorescence at the membrane level. Individual chloroplasts in adjacent cells under the grid pattern of granal stacks printed on leaves were also examined using a confocal microscope. Compared with chloroplasts in the shaded parts of the grid, those in the photoinactivated parts of the grid show greatly reduced chlorophyll autofluorescence. Moreover, these chloroplasts have lost the localised bright fluorescence from grana. Comparisons of fluorescence yields show that relative chlorophyll autofluorescence from grana observed in the confocal microscope parallels that determined in leaves. Our experiments provide direct visual evidence that fluorescence from grana is lost following photoinactivation of photosystem II in vivo.


2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Hyuk Oh ◽  
Dong Woo Kang ◽  
Tae Hoon Kim ◽  
Yong-Hwan Moon ◽  
Byoung Yong Moon ◽  
...  




2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhubaneswar Pradhan ◽  
Koushik Chakraborty ◽  
Nibedita Prusty ◽  
Deepa ◽  
Arup Kumar Mukherjee ◽  
...  

Chlorophyll a fluorescence (ChlF) parameters measured with fluorescence imaging techniques were used to investigate the combined effect of salt and partial submergence stress to understand photosynthetic performance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). ChlF parameters such as maximal fluorescence (Fm), variable fluorescence (Fv=Fm –F0), the maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) and the quantum yield of nonregulated energy dissipation of PSII (Y(NO)) were able to distinguish genotypes precisely based on their sensitivity to stress. Upon analysis, we found the images of F0 were indistinguishable among the genotypes, irrespective of their tolerance to salt and partial submergence stress. On the contrary, the images of Fm and Fv/Fm showed marked differences between the tolerant and susceptible genotypes in terms of tissue greenness and the appearance of dark spots as stress symptoms. The images of effective PSII quantum yield, the coefficient of nonphotochemical quenching (qN) and the coefficient of photochemical quenching (qP) captured under different PAR were able to distinguish the tolerant and susceptible genotypes, and were also quite effective for differentiating the tolerant and moderately tolerant ones. Similarly, the values of electron transport rate, qN, qP and Y(NO) were also able to distinguish the genotypes based on their sensitivity to stress. Overall, this investigation indicates the suitability of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging technique for precise phenotyping of rice based on their sensitivity to the combined effect of salt and partial submergence.



2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sándor Lenk ◽  
Claus Buschmann ◽  
Erhard E. Pfündel

Exposed and non-exposed halves of field-grown berries of the white grapevine Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot Blanc at various stages of ripeness were analysed using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. The stage of ripeness was classified by the total sugar concentration which ranged between 120 and 300 g L–1 for the different berries but was similar in the exposed and the non-exposed half of individual berries. Fluorescence was excited in the UV-A and the blue spectral region and detected at red as well as far-red wavelengths. At both emission ranges, UV-excited fluorescence was weak and required correction for the contribution of small false signals. After correction, in vivo UV screening by berry skins was derived from the ratio of UV-A to blue-excited fluorescence intensities, and a relationship between in vivo UV screening and flavonol quantity was established: the quantity of flavonols was determined by spectral analysis of extracted phenolics. Significantly high flavonol concentrations, and effective in vivo UV screening, were detected in most exposed half-berries at sugar concentrations higher than 200 g L–1 but not in non-exposed samples. This suggests that radiation-exposure conditions determine flavonol synthesis. Based on the absence of flavonol accumulation in exposed half-berries with sugar concentrations smaller than 200 g L–1, however, it is suggested that berries need to arrive at an advanced stage of ripeness before responding to radiation-exposure by synthesising large amounts of UV-protecting flavonols. Chlorophyll degradation, which was followed by blue-excited intensities of far-red fluorescence, progressed in parallel with increasing sugar content suggesting that chlorophyll degradation is associated with berry ripening. In addition, exposure to sunlight appeared to slightly stimulate chlorophyll decay.







2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (35) ◽  
pp. 9762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heng Wang ◽  
Xiangjie Qian ◽  
Lan Zhang ◽  
Sailong Xu ◽  
Haifeng Li ◽  
...  


2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. D. Li ◽  
X. Hu ◽  
J. K. Liu ◽  
G. M. Jiang ◽  
O. Li ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document