scholarly journals Effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in China

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (49) ◽  
pp. 19742-19747 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Huang ◽  
Y. Zhou ◽  
Y. Han ◽  
J. K. Hammitt ◽  
J. Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Perception ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Nuclear Accident ◽  
Fukushima Nuclear Accident

scholarly journals Risk perception, trust, and factors related to a planned new nuclear power plant in Taiwan after the 2011 Fukushima disaster

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 773-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Chun Ho ◽  
Shu-Fen Kao ◽  
Jung-Der Wang ◽  
Chien-Tien Su ◽  
Chiao-Tzu Patricia Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Perception ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Fukushima Disaster

scholarly journals Bipolarization of Risk Perception about the Health Effects of Radiation in Residents after the Accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0129227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makiko Orita ◽  
Naomi Hayashida ◽  
Yumi Nakayama ◽  
Tetsuko Shinkawa ◽  
Hideko Urata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Perception ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Health Effects ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Effects Of Radiation

Nuclear power debate and public opinion in Belarus: From Chernobyl to Ostrovets

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliaksandr Novikau
Keyword(s):  
Public Opinion ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Risk Communication ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Nuclear Energy ◽  
Traumatic Event ◽  
Nuclear Accident ◽  
Positive View ◽  
The City

The Belarusian government’s decision of the last decade to build a nuclear power plant near the city of Ostrovets, in northern Belarus, has proven to be controversial, resulting in a great deal of debate about nuclear energy in the country. The debate was inevitably shaped by the traumatic event that affected Belarus – the Chernobyl nuclear accident of 1986. The Belarusian authorities have consistently promoted a positive view of nuclear energy to the population in order to overcome the so-called ‘Chernobyl syndrome’ and deliberately shaped nuclear risk communication. As a result, the issue of trust remains crucial in all nuclear debates in Belarus.

scholarly journals Validation of Unit 1 of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant during its Accident

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-38
Author(s):  
Shigenao Maruyama
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Significant Loss ◽  
Great East Japan Earthquake ◽  
Nuclear Accident ◽  
Future Generations ◽  
Nuclear Accidents ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

Ten years have passed since the Great East Japan Earthquake and the subsequent accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (NPP) that occurred on March 11, 2011. The earthquake and tsunami caused significant loss of lives and widespread disaster in Japan. Several reports have been published on the nuclear accident; however, the original data released at the beginning of the accident were written in Japanese, and some of these documents are no longer accessible. Some of the scenarios pertaining to the accident have become standardized theories, and these scenarios may be passed down to future generations with different descriptions, which may not fully describe the actual occurrences. To prevent future nuclear accidents, the accident at Fukushima Daiichi must be properly understood and analyzed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document