scholarly journals Comparative Mutational Analysis of the Double-stranded RNA Binding Domains ofXenopus laevisRNA-binding Protein A

1996 ◽  
Vol 271 (45) ◽  
pp. 28112-28119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara C. Krovat ◽  
Michael F. Jantsch
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seisuke Yamashita ◽  
Takashi Nagata ◽  
Masahito Kawazoe ◽  
Chie Takemoto ◽  
Takanori Kigawa ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 3419-3424 ◽  
Author(s):  
C G Burd ◽  
E L Matunis ◽  
G Dreyfuss

The poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) is the major mRNA-binding protein in eukaryotes, and it is essential for viability of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The amino acid sequence of the protein indicates that it consists of four ribonucleoprotein consensus sequence-containing RNA-binding domains (RBDs I, II, III, and IV) and a proline-rich auxiliary domain at the carboxyl terminus. We produced different parts of the S. cerevisiae PABP and studied their binding to poly(A) and other ribohomopolymers in vitro. We found that none of the individual RBDs of the protein bind poly(A) specifically or efficiently. Contiguous two-domain combinations were required for efficient RNA binding, and each pairwise combination (I/II, II/III, and III/IV) had a distinct RNA-binding activity. Specific poly(A)-binding activity was found only in the two amino-terminal RBDs (I/II) which, interestingly, are dispensable for viability of yeast cells, whereas the activity that is sufficient to rescue lethality of a PABP-deleted strain is in the carboxyl-terminal RBDs (III/IV). We conclude that the PABP is a multifunctional RNA-binding protein that has at least two distinct and separable activities: RBDs I/II, which most likely function in binding the PABP to mRNA through the poly(A) tail, and RBDs III/IV, which may function through binding either to a different part of the same mRNA molecule or to other RNA(s).


RNA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Dzananovic ◽  
T. R. Patel ◽  
S. Deo ◽  
K. McEleney ◽  
J. Stetefeld ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 914-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feijie Wu ◽  
Lin Yu ◽  
Wenguang Cao ◽  
Yanfei Mao ◽  
Zhongyuan Liu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 1699-1706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Nagata ◽  
Kengo Tsuda ◽  
Naohiro Kobayashi ◽  
Mikako Shirouzu ◽  
Takanori Kigawa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pravin Kumar Ankush Jagtap ◽  
Marisa Müller ◽  
Pawel Masiewicz ◽  
Sören von Bülow ◽  
Nele Merret Hollmann ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMaleless (MLE) is an evolutionary conserved member of the DExH family of helicases in Drosophila. Besides its function in RNA editing and presumably siRNA processing, MLE is best known for its role in remodelling non-coding roX RNA in the context of X chromosome dosage compensation in male flies. MLE and its human orthologue, DHX9 contain two tandem double-stranded RNA binding domains (dsRBDs) located at the N-terminal region. The two dsRBDs are essential for localization of MLE at the X-territory and it is presumed that this involves binding roX secondary structures. However, for dsRBD1 roX RNA binding has so far not been described. Here, we determined the solution NMR structure of dsRBD1 and dsRBD2 of MLE in tandem and investigated its role in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) binding. Our NMR data show that both dsRBDs act as independent structural modules in solution and are canonical, non-sequence-specific dsRBDs featuring non-canonical KKxAK RNA binding motifs. NMR titrations combined with filter binding experiments document the contribution of dsRBD1 to dsRNA binding in vitro. Curiously, dsRBD1 mutants in which dsRNA binding in vitro is strongly compromised do not affect roX2 RNA binding and MLE localization in cells. These data suggest alternative functions for dsRBD1 in vivo.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document