scholarly journals Biochemical and Cellular Analysis Reveals Ligand Binding Specificities, a Molecular Basis for Ligand Recognition, and Membrane Association-dependent Activities of Cripto-1 and Cryptic

2017 ◽  
Vol 292 (10) ◽  
pp. 4138-4151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senem Aykul ◽  
Anthony Parenti ◽  
Kit Yee Chu ◽  
Jake Reske ◽  
Monique Floer ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apurba Bhattarai ◽  
Shristi Pawnikar ◽  
Yinglong Miao

AbstractAngiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) plays a key role in renin-angiotensin system regulation and amino acid homeostasis. Human ACE2 acts as the receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. ACE2 is also widely expressed in epithelial cells of lungs, heart, kidney and pancreas. It is considered an important drug target for treating SARS-CoV-2, as well as pulmonary diseases, heart failure, hypertension, renal diseases and diabetes. Despite the critical importance, the mechanism of ligand binding to the human ACE2 receptor remains unknown. Here, we address this challenge through all-atom simulations using a novel ligand Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (LiGaMD) method. Microsecond LiGaMD simulations have successfully captured both binding and unbinding of the MLN-4760 inhibitor in the ACE2 receptor. In the ligand unbound state, the ACE2 receptor samples distinct Open, Partially Open and Closed conformations. Ligand binding biases the receptor conformational ensemble towards the Closed state. The LiGaMD simulations thus suggest a conformational selection mechanism for ligand recognition by the ACE2 receptor. Our simulation findings are expected to facilitate rational drug design of ACE2 against coronaviruses and other related human diseases.


2011 ◽  
Vol 173 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela B.B. Trivella ◽  
Mirela I. Sairre ◽  
Debora Foguel ◽  
Luis Mauricio T.R. Lima ◽  
Igor Polikarpov

MedChemComm ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 578-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesham Haffez ◽  
David R. Chisholm ◽  
Roy Valentine ◽  
Ehmke Pohl ◽  
Christopher Redfern ◽  
...  

Molecular docking and ligand binding assays shed new light on the conformational flexibility of natural retinoids compared with less flexible synthetic ligands during binding to RARs and the resulting impact upon on the design of synthetic analogues.


2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (04) ◽  
pp. 756-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Yamanouchi ◽  
Tatsushiro Tamura ◽  
Shigeru Fujita ◽  
Takaaki Hato

SummaryTo define the structural basis of ligand recognition by αIIb β3, we conducted site-directed mutagenesis of residues located on the top surface of the β3 I-domain that is homologous to the I-domain of several α subunits and contains a putative ligand binding site. Here we identify D158 and N215 in β3 as novel residues critical for ligand binding. Alanine substitution of D158 or N215 abolished binding of a ligand-mimetic antibody and fibrinogen to αIIb β3 induced by different types of integrin activation. CHO cells expressing recombinant αIIb β3 bearing D158A or N215A mutation did not adhere to fibrinogen. These mutations had the same effect on ligand binding to another β3 integrin, αV β3. Compared to the αI-domain structure, the βB-βC loop containing D158 in the β3 I-domain is quite different in length and sequence. These results suggest that the structure for ligand recognition is different in the βI- and αI-domains.


Bioanalysis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vellalore N Kakkanaiah ◽  
Katie Matys ◽  
Patrick Bennett

Flow cytometer is a powerful cellular analysis tool consists of three main components; fluidics, optics and electronics. Flow cytometry methods have been used in all stages of drug development as like ligand binding assays (LBA). Both LBA and flow cytometry methods require specific interaction between the critical reagents and the analytes. Antibodies and their conjugates, viable dyes and permeabilizing buffer are the main critical reagents in flow cytometry methods. Similarly, antibodies, engineered proteins and their conjugates are the main critical reagents in LBA. The main difference between the two methods is the lack of true reference standards for flow cytometry cellular analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document