scholarly journals Nuclear condensates of the Polycomb protein chromobox 2 (CBX2) assemble through phase separation

2018 ◽  
Vol 294 (5) ◽  
pp. 1451-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roubina Tatavosian ◽  
Samantha Kent ◽  
Kyle Brown ◽  
Tingting Yao ◽  
Huy Nguyen Duc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Polycomb Protein ◽  
Condensate Formation

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins repress master regulators of development and differentiation through organization of chromatin structure. Mutation and dysregulation of PcG genes cause developmental defects and cancer. PcG proteins form condensates in the cell nucleus, and these condensates are the physical sites of PcG-targeted gene silencing via formation of facultative heterochromatin. However, the physiochemical principles underlying the formation of PcG condensates remain unknown, and their determination could shed light on how these condensates compact chromatin. Using fluorescence live-cell imaging, we observed that the Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) protein chromobox 2 (CBX2), a member of the CBX protein family, undergoes phase separation to form condensates and that the CBX2 condensates exhibit liquid-like properties. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we demonstrated that the conserved residues of CBX2 within the intrinsically disordered region (IDR), which is the region for compaction of chromatin in vitro, promote the condensate formation both in vitro and in vivo. We showed that the CBX2 condensates concentrate DNA and nucleosomes. Using genetic engineering, we report that trimethylation of Lys-27 at histone H3 (H3K27me3), a marker of heterochromatin formation produced by PRC2, had minimal effects on the CBX2 condensate formation. We further demonstrated that the CBX2 condensate formation does not require CBX2–PRC1 subunits; however, the condensate formation of CBX2–PRC1 subunits depends on CBX2, suggesting a mechanism underlying the assembly of CBX2–PRC1 condensates. In summary, our results reveal that PcG condensates assemble through liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) and suggest that phase-separated condensates can organize PcG-bound chromatin.

scholarly journals Polycomb Cbx2 Condensates Assemble through Phase Separation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roubina Tatavosian ◽  
Samantha Kent ◽  
Kyle Brown ◽  
Tingting Yao ◽  
Huy Nguyen Duc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Development And Differentiation ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

AbstractPolycomb group (PcG) proteins are master regulators of development and differentiation. Mutation and dysregulation of PcG genes cause developmental defects and cancer. PcG proteins form condensates in the nucleus of cells and these condensates are the physical sites of PcG-targeted gene silencing. However, the physiochemical principles underlying the PcG condensate formation remain unknown. Here we show that Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) protein Cbx2, one member of the Cbx family proteins, contains a long stretch of intrinsically disordered region (IDR). Cbx2 undergoes phase separation to form condensates. Cbx2 condensates exhibit liquid-like properties and can concentrate DNA and nucleosomes. We demonstrate that the conserved residues within the IDR promote the condensate formation in vitro and in vivo. We further indicate that H3K27me3 has minimal effects on the Cbx2 condensate formation while depletion of core PRC1 subunits facilitates the condensate formation. Thus, our results reveal that PcG condensates assemble through liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and suggest that PcG-bound chromatin is in part organized through phase-separated condensates.

scholarly journals Intrinsically disordered sequences in the Polycomb protein Polyhomeotic regulate condensate formation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibani Kapur ◽  
Elodie Boulier ◽  
Nicole Francis
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Sequence Composition ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Polycomb Protein ◽  
Size Number ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Polycomb Bodies

Abstract The Polycomb group (PcG) complex PRC1 localizes in the nucleus in the form of condensed structures called Polycomb bodies. The PRC1 subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) contains a polymerizing sterile alpha motif (SAM) that is implicated in both PcG body formation and chromatin organization in Drosophila and mammalian cells. A truncated version of Ph containing the SAM (mini-Ph), forms phase separated condensates with DNA or chromatin in vitro, suggesting PcG bodies may form by phase separation. In cells, Ph forms multiple condensates, while mini-Ph forms a single large nuclear condensate. We therefore hypothesize that sequences outside of mini-Ph are required for proper condensate formation. We identified three distinct Intrinsically Disordered Regions (IDRs) in Ph based on sequence composition and complexity. We tested the role of each IDR in Ph condensates using live imaging of transfected Drosophila S2 cells. We find that each IDR uniquely affects Ph SAM-dependent condensate size, number, and morphology.

scholarly journals Intrinsically disordered sequences in the Polycomb protein Polyhomeotic regulate condensate formation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibani Kapur ◽  
Élodie L Boulier ◽  
Nicole J Francis
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Sequence Composition ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Polycomb Protein ◽  
Size Number ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Polycomb Bodies

The Polycomb group (PcG) complex PRC1 localizes in the nucleus in the form of condensed structures called Polycomb bodies. The PRC1 subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) contains a polymerizing sterile alpha motif (SAM) that is implicated in both PcG body formation and chromatin organization in Drosophila and mammalian cells. A truncated version of Ph containing the SAM (mini-Ph), forms phase separated condensates with DNA or chromatin in vitro, suggesting PcG bodies may form by phase separation. In cells, Ph forms multiple condensates, while mini-Ph forms a single large nuclear condensate. We therefore hypothesize that sequences outside of mini-Ph are required for proper condensate formation. We identified three distinct Intrinsically Disordered Regions (IDRs) in Ph based on sequence composition and complexity. We tested the role of each IDR in Ph condensates using live imaging of transfected Drosophila S2 cells. We find that each IDR uniquely affects Ph SAM-dependent condensate size, number, and morphology.

scholarly journals Identifying sequence perturbations to an intrinsically disordered protein that determine its phase-separation behavior

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (21) ◽  
pp. 11421-11431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin S. Schuster ◽  
Gregory L. Dignon ◽  
Wai Shing Tang ◽  
Fleurie M. Kelley ◽  
Aishwarya Kanchi Ranganath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Lipid Membrane ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Sequence Features ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Arginine Residues

Phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) commonly underlies the formation of membraneless organelles, which compartmentalize molecules intracellularly in the absence of a lipid membrane. Identifying the protein sequence features responsible for IDP phase separation is critical for understanding physiological roles and pathological consequences of biomolecular condensation, as well as for harnessing phase separation for applications in bioinspired materials design. To expand our knowledge of sequence determinants of IDP phase separation, we characterized variants of the intrinsically disordered RGG domain from LAF-1, a model protein involved in phase separation and a key component of P granules. Based on a predictive coarse-grained IDP model, we identified a region of the RGG domain that has high contact probability and is highly conserved between species; deletion of this region significantly disrupts phase separation in vitro and in vivo. We determined the effects of charge patterning on phase behavior through sequence shuffling. We designed sequences with significantly increased phase separation propensity by shuffling the wild-type sequence, which contains well-mixed charged residues, to increase charge segregation. This result indicates the natural sequence is under negative selection to moderate this mode of interaction. We measured the contributions of tyrosine and arginine residues to phase separation experimentally through mutagenesis studies and computationally through direct interrogation of different modes of interaction using all-atom simulations. Finally, we show that despite these sequence perturbations, the RGG-derived condensates remain liquid-like. Together, these studies advance our fundamental understanding of key biophysical principles and sequence features important to phase separation.

scholarly journals Concentration and dosage sensitivity of proteins driving liquid-liquid phase separation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazanin Farahi ◽  
Tamas Lazar ◽  
Shoshana J. Wodak ◽  
Peter Tompa ◽  
Rita Pancsa
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Liquid Phase Separation ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation ◽  
In Cells ◽  
Dosage Sensitivity

AbstractLiquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a molecular process that leads to the formation of membraneless organelles (MLOs), i.e. functionally specialized liquid-like cellular condensates formed by proteins and nucleic acids. Integration of data on LLPS-associated proteins from dedicated databases revealed only modest overlap between them and resulted in a confident set of 89 human LLPS driver proteins. Since LLPS is highly concentration-sensitive, the underlying experiments are often criticized for applying higher-than-physiological protein concentrations. To clarify this issue, we performed a naive comparison of in vitro applied and quantitative proteomics-derived protein concentrations and discuss a number of considerations that rationalize the choice of apparently high in vitro concentrations in most LLPS studies. The validity of in vitro LLPS experiments is further supported by in vivo phase-separation experiments and by the observation that the corresponding genes show a strong propensity for dosage sensitivity. This observation implies that the availability of the respective proteins is tightly regulated in cells to avoid erroneous condensate formation. In all, we propose that although local protein concentrations are practically impossible to determine in cells, proteomics-derived cellular concentrations should rather be considered as lower limits of protein concentrations, than strict upper bounds, to be respected by in vitro experiments.

scholarly journals Expression of a myosin regulatory light chain phosphorylation site mutant complements the cytokinesis and developmental defects of Dictyostelium RMLC null cells.

1994 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 1945-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
B D Ostrow ◽  
P Chen ◽  
R L Chisholm
Keyword(s):  
Atpase Activity ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Contractile Activity ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Regulatory Light Chain ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Developmental Defects

In a number of systems phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain (RMLC) of myosin regulates the activity of myosin. In smooth muscle and vertebrate nonmuscle systems RMLC phosphorylation is required for contractile activity. In Dictyostelium discoideum phosphorylation of the RMLC regulates both ATPase activity and motor function. We have determined the site of phosphorylation on the Dictyostelium RMLC and used site-directed mutagenesis to replace the phosphorylated serine with an alanine. The mutant light chain was then expressed in RMLC null Dictyostelium cells (mLCR-) from an actin promoter on an integrating vector. The mutant RMLC was expressed at high levels and associated with the myosin heavy chain. RMLC bearing a ser13ala substitution was not phosphorylated in vitro by purified myosin light chain kinase, nor could phosphate be detected on the mutant RMLC in vivo. The mutant myosin had reduced actin-activated ATPase activity, comparable to fully dephosphorylated myosin. Unexpectedly, expression of the mutant RMLC rescued the primary phenotypic defects of the mlcR- cells to the same extent as did expression of wild-type RMLC. These results suggest that while phosphorylation of the Dictyostelium RMLC appears to be tightly regulated in vivo, it is not essential for myosin-dependent cellular functions.

scholarly journals The disordered P granule protein LAF-1 drives phase separation into droplets with tunable viscosity and dynamics

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (23) ◽  
pp. 7189-7194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shana Elbaum-Garfinkle ◽  
Younghoon Kim ◽  
Krzysztof Szczepaniak ◽  
Carlos Chih-Hsiung Chen ◽  
Christian R. Eckmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Driving Forces ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
P Granules ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered

P granules and other RNA/protein bodies are membrane-less organelles that may assemble by intracellular phase separation, similar to the condensation of water vapor into droplets. However, the molecular driving forces and the nature of the condensed phases remain poorly understood. Here, we show that the Caenorhabditis elegans protein LAF-1, a DDX3 RNA helicase found in P granules, phase separates into P granule-like droplets in vitro. We adapt a microrheology technique to precisely measure the viscoelasticity of micrometer-sized LAF-1 droplets, revealing purely viscous properties highly tunable by salt and RNA concentration. RNA decreases viscosity and increases molecular dynamics within the droplet. Single molecule FRET assays suggest that this RNA fluidization results from highly dynamic RNA–protein interactions that emerge close to the droplet phase boundary. We demonstrate than an N-terminal, arginine/glycine rich, intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) domain of LAF-1 is necessary and sufficient for both phase separation and RNA–protein interactions. In vivo, RNAi knockdown of LAF-1 results in the dissolution of P granules in the early embryo, with an apparent submicromolar phase boundary comparable to that measured in vitro. Together, these findings demonstrate that LAF-1 is important for promoting P granule assembly and provide insight into the mechanism by which IDP-driven molecular interactions give rise to liquid phase organelles with tunable properties.

scholarly journals Integration of Data from Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation Databases Highlights Concentration and Dosage Sensitivity of LLPS Drivers

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 3017
Author(s):  
Nazanin Farahi ◽  
Tamas Lazar ◽  
Shoshana J. Wodak ◽  
Peter Tompa ◽  
Rita Pancsa
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Systematic Difference ◽  
Liquid Phase Separation ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a molecular process that leads to the formation of membraneless organelles, representing functionally specialized liquid-like cellular condensates formed by proteins and nucleic acids. Integrating the data on LLPS-associated proteins from dedicated databases revealed only modest agreement between them and yielded a high-confidence dataset of 89 human LLPS drivers. Analysis of the supporting evidence for our dataset uncovered a systematic and potentially concerning difference between protein concentrations used in a good fraction of the in vitro LLPS experiments, a key parameter that governs the phase behavior, and the proteomics-derived cellular abundance levels of the corresponding proteins. Closer scrutiny of the underlying experimental data enabled us to offer a sound rationale for this systematic difference, which draws on our current understanding of the cellular organization of the proteome and the LLPS process. In support of this rationale, we find that genes coding for our human LLPS drivers tend to be dosage-sensitive, suggesting that their cellular availability is tightly regulated to preserve their functional role in direct or indirect relation to condensate formation. Our analysis offers guideposts for increasing agreement between in vitro and in vivo studies, probing the roles of proteins in LLPS.

scholarly journals Phase separation by the Sterile Alpha Motif of Polyhomeotic compartmentalizes Polycomb Group proteins and enhances their activity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Seif ◽  
Jin Joo Kang ◽  
Charles Sasseville ◽  
Olga Senkovitch ◽  
Alexander Kaltashov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Multiple Scales ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Sterile Alpha Motif ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase Activity ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Effects Of Ph

AbstractPolycomb Group (PcG) proteins organize chromatin at multiple scales to regulate gene expression. A conserved Sterile Alpha Motif (SAM) in the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) is important for chromatin compaction and large-scale chromatin organization. Like many SAMs, Ph SAM forms helical head to tail polymers, and SAM-SAM interactions between chromatin-bound Ph/PRC1 are believed to compact chromatin and mediate long-range interactions. To understand mechanistically how this occurs, we analyzed the effects of Ph SAM on chromatin in vitro. We find that incubation of chromatin or DNA with a truncated Ph protein containing the SAM results in formation of concentrated, phase-separated condensates. Condensate formation depends on Ph SAM, and is enhanced by but not strictly dependent on, its polymerization activity. Ph SAM-dependent condensates can recruit PRC1 from extracts and enhance PRC1 ubiquitin ligase activity towards histone H2A. Overexpression of Ph with an intact SAM increases ubiquitylated H2A in cells. Thus, phase separation is an activity of the SAM, which, in the context of Ph, can mediate large-scale compaction of chromatin into biochemical compartments that facilitate histone modification.

scholarly journals Polarisome scaffolder Spa2-mediated macromolecular condensation of Aip5 for actin polymerization

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Xie ◽  
Jialin Sun ◽  
Xiao Han ◽  
Alma Turšić-Wunder ◽  
Joel D. W. Toh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Stress Conditions ◽  
Scaffolding Protein ◽  
Actin Assembly ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Actin Cables

Abstract A multiprotein complex polarisome nucleates actin cables for polarized cell growth in budding yeast and filamentous fungi. However, the dynamic regulations of polarisome proteins in polymerizing actin under physiological and stress conditions remains unknown. We identify a previously functionally unknown polarisome member, actin-interacting-protein 5 (Aip5), which promotes actin assembly synergistically with formin Bni1. Aip5-C terminus is responsible for its activities by interacting with G-actin and Bni1. Through N-terminal intrinsically disordered region, Aip5 forms high-order oligomers and generate cytoplasmic condensates under the stresses conditions. The molecular dynamics and reversibility of Aip5 condensates are regulated by scaffolding protein Spa2 via liquid-liquid phase separation both in vitro and in vivo. In the absence of Spa2, Aip5 condensates hamper cell growth and actin cable structures under stress treatment. The present study reveals the mechanisms of actin assembly for polarity establishment and the adaptation in stress conditions to protect actin assembly by protein phase separation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document